BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
3/18/2016 5:49:00 PM | Browse: 865 | Download: 1365
Publication Name World Journal of Clinical Urology
Manuscript ID 22623
Country United States
Received
2015-09-10 08:28
Peer-Review Started
2015-09-10 15:17
To Make the First Decision
2015-10-27 11:06
Return for Revision
2015-11-07 15:29
Revised
2015-12-09 02:22
Second Decision
2016-02-18 11:56
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief
2016-03-09 12:13
Articles in Press
2016-03-09 12:13
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript
2016-03-09 18:47
Publish the Manuscript Online
2016-03-18 17:49
ISSN 2219-2816 (online)
Open Access This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Article Reprints For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website http://www.wjgnet.com
Category Urology & Nephrology
Manuscript Type Retrospective Study
Article Title Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A comparison of approaches to the posterior renal mass
Manuscript Source Invited Manuscript
All Author List Jessica J Wetterlin, Robert H Blackwell, Sarah Capodice, Stephanie Kliethermes, Marcus L Quek and Gopal N Gupta
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author Jessica J Wetterlin, MD, Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S. First Avenue, Fahey Center, Room 261, Maywood, IL 60153, United States. jwetterlin@lumc.edu
Key Words Retroperitoneal; Transperitoneal; Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy; Posterior renal masses
Core Tip A retrospective review was completed to evaluate perioperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) performed for posterior renal tumors performed via a transperitoneal or retroperitoneal (RP) approach. Ninety-one patients underwent RALPN for a posterior renal tumor. Fifty-four procedures were performed via the RP approach. Total operative time, robotic console time, and median estimated blood loss were significantly lower via the RP approach. Fifty-seven percent of RP procedures were performed off-clamp. The RP approach to RALPN for posterior renal tumors is superior with regard to operative time and blood loss and the ability to perform the procedure off-clamp.
Publish Date 2016-03-18 17:49
Citation Wetterlin JJ, Blackwell RH, Capodice S, Kliethermes S, Quek ML, Gupta GN. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A comparison of approaches to the posterior renal mass. World J Clin Urol 2016; 5(1): 60-65
URL http://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2816/full/v5/i1/60.htm
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v5.i1.60
Full Article (PDF) WJCU-5-60.pdf
Full Article (Word) WJCU-5-60.doc
Manuscript File 22623-Review.doc
Answering Reviewers 22623-Answering reviewers.pdf
Audio Core Tip 22623-Audio core tip.mp3
Biostatistics Review Certificate 22623-Biostatistics statement.pdf
Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure Form 22623-Conflict-of-interest statement.pdf
Copyright License Agreement 22623-Copyright assignment.pdf
Signed Informed Consent Form(s) or Document(s) Informed_Consent_Statement_20150910025227.docx
Institutional Review Board Approval Form or Document 22623-Institutional review board statement.pdf
Non-Native Speakers of English Editing Certificate Editing_Certificate_20150910025316.docx
Peer-review Report 22623-Peer-review(s).pdf
Scientific Misconduct Check 22623-Scientific misconduct check.pdf
Scientific Editor Work List 22623-Scientific editor work list.pdf