BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles in Press
12/17/2025 9:36:30 AM | Browse: 0 | Download: 0
Publication Name World Journal of Cardiology
Manuscript ID 112956
Country United States
Category Medicine, General & Internal
Manuscript Type Meta-Analysis
Article Title Comparative efficacy and safety of chlorthalidone vs hydrochlorothiazide in hypertension management: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Manuscript Source Invited Manuscript
All Author List Usha Kumari, Manaswini Kaka, Fakhar Abbas, Amar Rai, Sanjana Kumari, Hakim Ullah Wazir and Salim Surani
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author Salim Surani, Department of Medicine and Pharmacology, Texas A and M University, 40 Bizzell Street, College Station, TX 77843, United States. srsurani@hotmail.com
Key Words Hypertension; Chlorthalidone; Hydrochlorothiazide; Blood pressure reduction; Cardiovascular outcomes
Core Tip Hypertension is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease, chlorthalidone and hydrochlorothiazide are widely used treatments. This meta-analysis compared their efficacy and safety in adults with primary hypertension, including 11 studies published from 2005 to 2025. Chlorthalidone achieved greater reductions in both systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, as well as superior nocturnal control (P = 0.0002). Cardiovascular safety was similar, with a nonsignificant reduction in myocardial infarction risk for chlorthalidone and no difference in stroke or mortality, but hydrochlorothiazide had a lower risk of hypokalemia. The findings highlight that drug choice should be tailored to individual patient needs, balancing stronger blood pressure reduction from chlorthalidone against the lower hypokalemia risk of hydrochlorothiazide.
Citation Kumari U, Kaka M, Abbas F, Rai A, Kumari S, Wazir HU, Surani S. Comparative efficacy and safety of chlorthalidone vs hydrochlorothiazide in hypertension management: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Cardiol 2025; In press
Received
2025-08-11 01:32
Peer-Review Started
2025-08-11 01:33
First Decision by Editorial Office Director
2025-09-03 03:42
Return for Revision
2025-09-03 03:42
Revised
2025-10-01 01:52
Publication Fee Transferred
Second Decision by Editor
2025-12-17 02:42
Second Decision by Editor-in-Chief
Final Decision by Editorial Office Director
2025-12-17 09:36
Articles in Press
2025-12-17 09:36
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript
ISSN 1949-8462 (online)
Open Access This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright © The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Permissions For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website http://www.wjgnet.com