BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles in Press
7/6/2026 6:39:33 AM | Browse: 6 | Download: 0
Publication Name World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Manuscript ID 120890
DOI 10.4240/wjgs.120890
Country China
Category Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Manuscript Type Retrospective Study
Article Title Erector spinae plane block vs transversus abdominis plane block for visceral and somatic pain after laparoscopic appendectomy
Manuscript Source Unsolicited Manuscript
All Author List Hao Cheng, Can Liu and Ming-Yang Li
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author Ming-Yang Li, Department of Anesthesiology, Yunyang County People’s Hospital, No. 398 Liangshuiping Road, Qinglong Street, Yunyang County, Chongqing 404500, China. smoothlmy@163.com
Key Words Erector spinae plane block; Transversus abdominis plane block; Laparoscopic appendectomy; Visceral pain; Somatic pain; Postoperative analgesia
Core Tip This retrospective study compared the analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy, with a specific focus on differentiating visceral and somatic pain. The results showed that ESPB provided significantly better control of early postoperative visceral pain within the first 12 hours compared with transversus abdominis plane block, while both techniques demonstrated similar effectiveness for somatic pain. Patients receiving ESPB also required less rescue analgesia and reported higher satisfaction with postoperative pain management. These findings suggest that ESPB may be a preferable regional analgesic technique for laparoscopic appendectomy when visceral pain is the predominant postoperative component.
Citation Cheng H, Liu C, Li MY. Erector spinae plane block vs transversus abdominis plane block for visceral and somatic pain after laparoscopic appendectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; In press
PDF 120890-in-press.pdf
Received
2026-04-22 10:12
Peer-Review Started
2026-04-22 10:12
First Decision by Editorial Office Director
2026-05-25 02:55
Return for Revision
2026-05-25 02:55
Revised
2026-06-25 07:41
Publication Fee Transferred
2026-06-29 06:54
Second Decision by Editor
2026-07-06 03:34
Second Decision by Editor-in-Chief
Final Decision by Editorial Office Director
2026-07-06 06:39
Articles in Press
2026-07-06 06:39
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript
ISSN 1948-9366 (online)
Open Access This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright ©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. No commercial re-use. See Permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
Permissions For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website http://www.wjgnet.com