BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles in Press
12/14/2016 4:50:00 PM | Browse: 258 | Download: 213
Publication Name World Journal of Meta-Analysis
Manuscript ID 30116
Country United States
Category Medicine, Research & Experimental
Manuscript Type Meta-Analysis
Article Title Is there a difference between 19G core biopsy needle and 22G core biopsy needle in diagnosing the correct etiology? - A meta-analysis and systematic review
Manuscript Source Unsolicited Manuscript
All Author List Manasa Kandula, Matthew L Bechtold, Kaninika Verma, Bhagat S Aulakh, Deepak Taneja and Srinivas R Puli
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author Manasa Kandula, MD, Division of Internal Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL 61614, United States. manasakandula14@gmail.com
Key Words Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration; solid mass lesions; Endoscopic ultrasound; pancreatic mass; pancreatic cytology; core biopsies; 19G procore needle; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; 22G procore needle
Core Tip Management of pancreatic solid mass lesions relies greatly on accuracy of diagnosis of these lesions. Procore fine needle biopsy needles have been found to have a diagnostic accuracy comparable to, if not better than the standard needles in diagnosing the intestinal and extra-intestinal mass lesions. Amongst the Procore needles, the 19G and 22G Procore needles have both been shown to obtain good quality core tissue samples but both have unique characteristics of their own. This meta-analysis compares the feasibility and accuracy of 19G and 22G Procore needles in determining the diagnosis of solid mass lesions.
Citation Kandula M, Bechtold ML, Verma K, Aulakh BS, Taneja D, Puli SR. Is there a difference between 19G core biopsy needle and 22G core biopsy needle in diagnosing the correct etiology? - A meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Meta-Anal 2017; 5(2): 54-62
Received
2016-09-12 11:23
Peer-Review Started
To Make the First Decision
2016-09-13 14:07
Return for Revision
2016-09-13 20:00
Revised
2016-09-28 04:48
Second Decision
2016-12-07 16:36
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief
2016-12-14 16:50
Articles in Press
2016-12-14 16:50
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript
2017-04-18 11:18
ISSN 2308-3840 (online)
Open Access This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright © The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Permissions For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website http://www.wjgnet.com