BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles in Press
9/19/2017 8:58:24 PM | Browse: 259 | Download: 495
Publication Name World Journal of Gastroenterology
Manuscript ID 35344
Country France
Category Surgery
Manuscript Type Meta-Analysis
Article Title Short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic vs open rectal excision for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Manuscript Source Unsolicited Manuscript
All Author List Aleix Martínez-Pérez, Maria Clotilde Carra, Francesco Brunetti and Nicola de'Angelis
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author Nicola de'Angelis, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Digestive, Hepato-biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Est - UPEC, 51 avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, Créteil 94010, France. nicola.deangelis@aphp.fr
Key Words Laparoscopic rectal resection; Open rectal resection; Laparoscopy; Rectal cancer; Postoperative morbidity; Short-term outcomes; Systematic review; Meta-analysis
Core Tip There is no consensus on which technique, between laparoscopic rectal resection (LRR) and open rectal resection (ORR), is more beneficial for the patient. A systematic review and meta-analysis exclusively based on randomized clinical trials comparing LRR vs ORR has been performed. The pooled analyses focused on the evaluation and comparison of short-term clinical outcomes and showed that postoperative morbidity and mortality are similar between the two surgical approaches. However, LRR is associated with lesser blood loss and smaller incision length, which may represent clinical advantages for the patient.
Citation Martínez-Pérez A, Carra MC, Brunetti F, de’Angelis N. Short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic vs open rectal excision for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(44): 7906-7916
Received
2017-07-11 06:39
Peer-Review Started
2017-07-12 01:06
To Make the First Decision
2017-08-30 02:56
Return for Revision
2017-08-31 06:49
Revised
2017-09-09 11:34
Second Decision
2017-09-15 01:59
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief
2017-09-19 20:58
Articles in Press
2017-09-19 20:58
Publication Fee Transferred
2017-10-12 03:49
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript
2017-11-17 02:15
ISSN 1007-9327 (print) and 2219-2840 (online)
Open Access This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright © The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Permissions For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website http://www.wjgnet.com