BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles in Press
3/22/2020 9:32:47 PM | Browse: 157 | Download: 416
Publication Name World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
Manuscript ID 53038
Country China
Category Surgery
Manuscript Type Retrospective Cohort Study
Article Title Robotic- vs laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for locally advanced rectal cancer based on propensity score matching: Short-term outcomes at a colorectal center in China
Manuscript Source Invited Manuscript
All Author List Shan-Ping Ye, Wei-Quan Zhu, Dong-Ning Liu, Xiong Lei, Qun-Guang Jiang, Hui-Min Hu, Bo Tang, Peng-Hui He, Geng-Mei Gao, He-Chun Tang, Jun Shi and Tai-Yuan Li
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Funding Agency Grant Number
Infrastructure Supporting Project of Jiangxi Scientific Research Institute 20142BBA13039
Corresponding Author Tai-Yuan Li, MD, PhD, Chief Doctor, Director, Director, Professor, Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China. litaiyuanyfy@sina.com
Key Words Rectal neoplasms; Robotics; Laparoscopy; Proctectomy; Treatment outcome;
Core Tip For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, there is no consensus regarding whether robotic-assisted proctectomy and laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy is more beneficial. We conducted this retrospective cohort study to compare the short-term outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic for the rectal surgery. Compared with the laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy group, the robotic-assisted proctectomy group had less intraoperative blood loss, lower volume of pelvic cavity drainage, less time to remove the pelvic drainage tube and urinary catheter, longer distal resection margin and lower rates of conversion. Furthermore, the time to recover bowel function, the harvested lymph nodes, the postoperative length of hospital stay, the rate of unplanned readmission within 30 d postoperatively, and the rates of total complications showed no difference between the two groups.
Citation Ye SP, Zhu WQ, Liu DN, Lei X, Jiang QG, Hu HM, Tang B, He PH, Gao GM, Tang HC, Shi J, Li TY. Robotic- vs laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for locally advanced rectal cancer based on propensity score matching: Short-term outcomes at a colorectal center in China. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(4): 424-434
Received
2019-12-11 07:03
Peer-Review Started
2019-12-11 07:04
To Make the First Decision
Return for Revision
2019-12-26 00:55
Revised
2019-12-28 02:53
Second Decision
2020-03-19 10:11
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief
2020-03-22 21:32
Articles in Press
2020-03-22 21:32
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript
2020-04-14 02:14
ISSN 1948-5204 (online)
Open Access This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Permissions For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website http://www.wjgnet.com