BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles in Press
7/19/2020 10:00:46 PM | Browse: 251 | Download: 546
Publication Name World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
Manuscript ID 53678
Country Japan
Category Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Manuscript Type Retrospective Study
Article Title Endoscopic mucosal resection vs endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors
Manuscript Source Invited Manuscript
All Author List Mitsuru Esaki, Kazuhiro Haraguchi, Kazuya Akahoshi, Naru Tomoeda, Akira Aso, Soichi Itaba, Haruei Ogino, Yusuke Kitagawa, Hiroyuki Fujii, Kazuhiko Nakamura, Masaru Kubokawa, Naohiko Harada, Yosuke Minoda, Sho Suzuki, Eikichi Ihara and Yoshihiro Ogawa
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author Eikichi Ihara, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Doctor, Doctor, Senior Lecturer, Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan. eikichi@intmed3.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp
Key Words Endoscopic mucosal resection; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumor; Short-term; Outcome; Propensity score matching
Core Tip The standard treatment for superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) is controversial. We conducted a multi-center retrospective study, which aimed to compare the treatment outcomes of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with those of endoscopic submucosal dissection for SNADETs by propensity score matching analysis. Twenty-eight patients were matched in each group. EMR achieved shorter procedure time and hospital stay than endoscopic submucosal dissection without any significant differences in curability and safety. Therefore, EMR for SNADETs has an advantage in total medical costs of endoscopic treatment.
Citation Esaki M, Haraguchi K, Akahoshi K, Tomoeda N, Aso A, Itaba S, Ogino H, Kitagawa Y, Fujii H, Nakamura K, Kubokawa M, Harada N, Minoda Y, Suzuki S, Ihara E, Ogawa Y. Endoscopic mucosal resection vs endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(8): 918-930
Received
2020-01-01 01:00
Peer-Review Started
2020-01-01 01:00
To Make the First Decision
Return for Revision
2020-04-18 22:41
Revised
2020-07-03 04:24
Second Decision
2020-07-17 09:27
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief
2020-07-19 22:00
Articles in Press
2020-07-19 22:00
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript
2020-08-07 08:53
ISSN 1948-5204 (online)
Open Access This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Permissions For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website http://www.wjgnet.com