Publication Name	World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Manuscript ID	90990
Country	China

Category	Surgery
Manuscript Type	Retrospective Cohort Study
Article Title	Comparison of prognosis and postoperative morbidities between standard pancreaticoduodenectomy and the TRIANGLE technique for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Manuscript Source	Invited Manuscript
All Author List	He-Xing Hang, Zheng-Hua Cai, Yi-Fei Yang, Xu Fu, Yu-Dong Qiu and Hao Cheng
Funding Agency and Grant Number	Funding Agency Grant Number National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 31971518
Corresponding Author	Yu-Dong Qiu, Doctor, MD, PhD, Chief Physician, Professor, Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, No. 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu Province, China. yudongqiunj@163.com
Key Words	Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; TRIANGLE technique; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Prognosis; Postoperative morbidities
Core Tip	We compared the prognosis and postoperative morbidities between standard pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and the TRIANGLE technique for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The TRIANGLE technique was safe and feasible, with acceptable postoperative complications, and improved the extent of radical resection. However, longer duration of operation, more intraoperative blood loss and higher incidence of postoperative diarrhea indicated that TRIANGLE technique was a more aggressive procedure. Local recurrence, disease-free survival and overall survival did not differ between the two groups. These results suggest that the TRIANGLE technique is not necessary for all resectable PDAC patients.
Citation	Hang HX, Cai ZH, Yang YF, Fu X, Qiu YD, Cheng H. Comparison of prognosis and postoperative morbidities between standard pancreaticoduodenectomy and the TRIANGLE technique for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16(3): 689-699

Received	2023-12-19 13:22
Peer-Review Started	2023-12-19 13:22
To Make the First Decision
Return for Revision	2024-01-04 13:51
Revised	2024-01-17 16:38
Second Decision	2024-02-21 02:45
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief	2024-02-21 06:02
Articles in Press	2024-02-21 06:02
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript	2024-03-13 03:19

ISSN	1948-9366 (online)
Open Access	This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright	©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com