1
|
-
"Dear Editorial Team!
We sincerely thank you for your invaluable contribution to the work on our article. Your professionalism, attention to detail, and careful approach to editing have made the material much better and more informative.
I am particularly grateful for your willingness to provide constructive criticism and valuable recommendations that have helped improve the quality of the publication. Thanks to your diligence and efforts, the article has received a worthy place on the pages of your esteemed magazine.
We wish you further success in your work, inexhaustible energy and new achievements. We hope for further fruitful cooperation and thank you for your time and attention.
With respect and appreciation,
Mikhail Kostik, MD, Ph.D., Professor"
-
Abramova NN, Avrusin IS, Kozlova OP, Firsova LA, Kuleshova AG, Kondratiev GV, Ivanov DO, Aleksandrovich YS, Kostik MM. Predictors of lethal outcome in patients with immunoinflammatory diseases hospitalized in the intensive care unit. World J Crit Care Med 2025; 14(3): 101890 [DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.101890]
|
2
|
-
"Great staff to work with. The process is been refined over the period of time. The site is easier to navigate. Formatting is excellent.
Reviewers feed backs are timely and relevant. Definitely, they have made great progress which is reflected in their quality and the impact factor. Would definitely publish with them again. Thanks to the reviewers, editors and the staff for their commitment and dedication."
-
Kogilathota Jagirdhar GS, Okafor CC, Hussain M, Elmati PR, Ghumman A, Shah M, Surani S. Decline of the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube: A review of shifting practices in gastrointestinal hemorrhage management. World J Crit Care Med 2025; 14(3): 101856 [DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.101856]
|
3
|
-
"Great staff to work with. The process is been refined over the period of time. The site is easier to navigate. Formatting is excellent.
Reviewers feed backs are timely and relevant. Definitely, they have made great progress which is reflected in their quality and the impact factor. Would definitely publish with them again. Thanks to the reviewers, editors and the staff for their commitment and dedication."
-
Elmati PR, Nagaradona T, Raghove V, Jagirdhar GSK, Surani S. Methylene blue in the critical care setting. World J Crit Care Med 2025; 14(3): 105350 [DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.105350]
|
4
|
-
"We are deeply honored that our research has been successfully published in World Journal of Diabetes. The entire process of submission, peer review, and publication was conducted in an efficient and transparent manner. The reviewers provided professional, detailed, and constructive feedback. The editorial team responded promptly, demonstrated patience, and exhibited a high level of professionalism. Overall, World Journal of Diabetes effectively balances academic excellence with a positive author experience, making it a reputable and high-quality publishing platform."
-
Wu SX, Liang XL, Zhu QQ, Wang W, Jiang L, Chen HH, Tian S, Qi M. Altered hippocampal subfield volumes are associated with memory and executive function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(7): 104424 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.104424]
|
5
|
-
"Thank you for your support. Indexing in Scopus is essential for the World Journal of Clinical Cases and Medicine (WJCCM) to enhance its global visibility, attract quality submissions, and improve academic credibility. It will also encourage more researchers to cite published work, thereby strengthening the journal’s impact and recognition in the international scientific community."
-
Saini S, Pahil S, Mohindra R, Sachdeva N, Sharma N, Pannu AK. Diagnostic utility of sepsis screening tools, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein in nosocomial fever of unknown origin. World J Crit Care Med 2025; 14(3): 106496 [DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.106496]
|
6
|
-
"I am very satisfied with the overall editorial and peer review process. The online submission system was user-friendly, and the communication from the editorial office was timely and clear. The peer review was thorough, constructive, and provided valuable insights that significantly improved the quality of the manuscript. The editing quality and final published version, including figures and tables, met high standards. The publication process adhered to ethical and academic norms, and the timelines were reasonable. I appreciate the journal's commitment to academic integrity and professionalism throughout the publishing process. Kudos"
-
Mathew C, Devan J, Jacob J. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration and patient survival in a South Indian intensive care unit. World J Crit Care Med 2025; 14(3): 105611 [DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v14.i3.105611]
|
7
|
-
"I think the review process of WJGO is very objective and rigorous. The peer reviewers are very professional, and the questions raised significantly improve the rigor of this study and the readability of the manuscript. The journal editors are also very responsible and efficient. This is a great submission experience."
-
Zhao YZ, Han JQ, Zhao XR, Wang ZY, He KY, Duan YS, Lu HX. Predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio combined with carcinoembryonic antigen in postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy after gastric cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(7): 107399 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.107399]
|
8
|
-
"The article acceptance and publication process is a challenging and demanding process, and unfortunately, the demands and requests are overwhelming. This process could be streamlined and progress could be made faster. This way, it's important to think twice before submitting a manuscript to a journal. Authors could be provided with additional conveniences, and all requests could be addressed at once."
-
Yuncu M. Broader perspective on the role of peroneus longus tendon in ligament reconstruction. World J Orthop 2025; 16(7): 107957 [DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.107957]
|
9
|
-
"We sincerely thank the assistant editor, science editor, peer reviewers, editorial director, journal editor-in-chief, company editor-in-chief, language editor, and production editor for your exceptional efforts in refining and publishing our manuscript. Your thorough peer review and meticulous editorial guidance significantly enhanced the quality and credibility of our work. We deeply appreciate the journal’s commitment to rigorous scholarship and timely publication. Wishing World Journal of Orthopedics continued success in advancing orthopedic research and serving the scientific community."
-
Wang S, Liu HR, Zou KT, Gao F, Wang SY, Mutasa B, Li J, Hong P. Ulnar lengthening in the treatment of forearm deformity caused by hereditary multiple exostoses in children. World J Orthop 2025; 16(7): 108319 [DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.108319]
|
10
|
-
"We are very satisfied with the publication process of our manuscript in the World Journal of Orthopedics. The peer reviewers provided highly professional and constructive feedback, which significantly improved the quality of our article. The editorial team was exceptionally responsive and efficient, ensuring smooth communication and a rapid review timeline. From submission to publication, the process was well-organized and transparent, demonstrating the journal’s commitment to supporting authors. We sincerely appreciate the editors’ dedication and the reviewers’ expertise, which have greatly contributed to the final outcome. This experience reinforces our confidence in the journal’s credibility and academic standards."
-
Pu FF, Peng XL, Zhou FZ, Zhao XL, Yang L, Cao JQ, Wei L, Feng J, Xia P. Treatment of lumbar tuberculosis with minimally invasive anterior lesion clearance combined with posterior fixation. World J Orthop 2025; 16(7): 106041 [DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.106041]
|
11
|
-
"I am very pleased with the overall publication process. The editorial team was professional and efficient throughout. The peer review was fair, constructive, and helped enhance the quality of my work. Communication was clear and timely, and I appreciated the smooth workflow from submission to publication. Thank you for the positive experience."
-
Yousif Mohamed AM, Salih M, Mohamed M, Abbas AE, Elsiddig M, Osama Omar M, Abdelsalam M, Elhag B, Mohamed N, Eisa Ahmed SH, Ahmed S, Mohamed D, Omar D. Comparative efficacy of cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in unstable intertrochanteric fractures: A meta-analysis. World J Orthop 2025; 16(7): 107950 [DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.107950]
|
12
|
-
"It was a great pleasure to work with the journal’s editing team. The peer review process was very fast. However, the time given for revision is somewhat short. Sometimes it is very difficult to do corrections in revised manuscript for 14 days. The authors use to be very busy performing operations and doing other practical work"
-
Shastov AL, Kolchin SN, Malkova TA. Effectiveness of the induced membrane technique in aseptic and infected long-bone defect management: Are there any differences? World J Orthop 2025; 16(7): 107337 [DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.107337]
|
13
|
-
"The review process of the World Journal of Diabetes is highly efficient. Peer review is initiated just three days after submission, and ultimately five experts agree to participate in the review process. Following the revision stage, a second editorial decision is made promptly. Throughout the subsequent publication process, communication with the journal editor is smooth and effective, resulting in a successful and satisfactory publication experience."
-
Xiang LL, Feng J, Li SY, Zhu YT, Chen YJ, Zhong TY, Zhu YF, Zeng Y. Predictive ability of lipid indices for large-for-gestational-age infants in pregnant females with gestational diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(7): 104306 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.104306]
|
14
|
-
"The overall process of processing an article, right from submission to publication of an article, is very appreciable. The team at the World Journal of Diabetes is very particular about the processing of manuscript at each and every step and is very cooperative. The overall process is very satisfactory. I heartily congratulate the team for their positive efforts and wish them all the best."
-
Nagoba BS, Gavkare AM, Nanaware N, Mumbre SS, Bhavthankar S. Systemic immune indicators: Early predictors of renal damage in children with newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(7): 108209 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.108209]
|
15
|
-
"I am generally satisfied with the editing and publishing process of the article. For a non-native English speaker, it is necessary to polish the language of the article. However, I don't understand if it is necessary to have the article edited and polished twice as required. Throughout the submission process, it is very important to have effective communication with the editorial department, but the communication channels seem not to be very convenient."
-
Yang YS, Li XR, Wang ZM, Zheng L, Li JL, Cui XL, Song YB, Ma JJ, Guo HF, Gao LX, Zhou XH. Effect of rapamycin nanoparticles in an animal model of primary biliary cholangitis. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(6): 104073 [PMID: 40606922 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i6.104073]
|
16
|
-
"The overall experience with the journal was very satisfactory. The submission system was user-friendly, and the editorial team provided timely updates throughout the process. The peer review comments were constructive, fair, and significantly improved the quality of our manuscript. We also appreciated the high-quality editing, layout, and publication efficiency. We look forward to submitting future work to this journal."
-
Lv Y, Li WX, Sun L, Xin LP, Li T, Zhong WT, Zhu HY, An R, Liu AJ, Chen L. Neutrophil extracellular traps predict sensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(7): 105723 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.105723]
|
17
|
-
"This submission experience was truly impressive. From the efficient initial review to the rigorous peer-review process, and finally the swift online publication, every step demonstrated the journal's high level of professionalism. The editorial team maintained smooth communication, and the reviewers' feedback was highly constructive, significantly contributing to the improvement of the paper's quality."
-
Gao L, Liu ZX, Wang JN. Predictive model and risk analysis for outcomes in diabetic foot ulcer using eXtreme Gradient Boosting algorithm and SHapley Additive exPlanation. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(7): 104789 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.104789]
|
18
|
-
"Overall, our experience with the publication process in World Journal of Diabetes has been highly satisfactory. From the initial submission to the online publication, the editorial team demonstrated professionalism, efficiency, and clear communication throughout each stage. The peer review process was rigorous yet constructive,feedback from reviewers was timely, detailed, and significantly helped improve the quality of our manuscript. We particularly appreciated the prompt responses from the editorial assistants, who addressed our questions and revisions with patience, ensuring a smooth and transparent workflow."
-
Zhao JD, Guo MZ, Zhang Y, Zhu SH, Wang YT, Zhang YP, Liu X, Cheng S, Wang F, Xu Q, Ruan NB, Fang ZH. Efficacy of Xiaokeqing granules and lifestyle intervention in treating prediabetes mellitus considering metabolomic biomarkers: A randomised controlled trial. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(7): 105219 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.105219]
|
19
|
-
"We are highly satisfied with the overall editorial and publishing experience with the journal. The online submission system was intuitive and efficient, and the peer review process was conducted in a timely, fair, and constructive manner. The reviewers’ comments were both professional and insightful, significantly contributing to the improvement of our manuscript.
The editorial team demonstrated excellent attention to detail during the editing and typesetting stages. The quality of the article PDFs, online full-text layout, figures, and tables met our expectations, and the final published version was accurate and well-presented. We also appreciate the journal’s adherence to academic norms and ethical standards, including clear publication policies and a transparent academic misconduct screening process.
In summary, the publication process was smooth, rigorous, and author-friendly. We thank the editorial office, reviewers, and production team for their dedicated support and professional service."
-
Luo C, Yu XM, Zeng MQ, Duan CZ, Xu SY, Zhu CY, Zheng ZG, Sun D, Fang J, He DJ. Breaking the diabetes-depression cycle: Exploring shared mechanisms, neuroinflammation, and emerging interventions for metabolic-mood comorbidities. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(7): 107406 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.107406]
|
20
|
-
"During the repair process, the editor insisted that the final results should be presented in the form of a PPT. This requirement was extremely unreasonable. Other editable versions of the image, such as the AI format, should be allowed. Editors should assist authors in completing the revision and publication of their articles more efficiently, rather than adding unnecessary tasks to the authors."
-
Cao X, Zheng SH, Shen JM, Li SZ, Hou L, Zhang JX, Li XK, Du HB, Zhang LP, Ye YA, Zao XB. Pan-cancer analysis of UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase in human tumors and its function in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(7): 105981 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.105981]
|
21
|
-
"The online submission system was user-friendly, allowing for efficient manuscript uploading and tracking. The peer review process was transparent and rigorous, with constructive feedback provided in a timely manner. The journal’s editorial team maintained clear communication throughout, ensuring a smooth submission experience. Overall, the combination of a robust review process and supportive editorial workflow is highly commendable."
-
Wang Z, Shi FC, Hou SB, Sun QQ, Fang CY. Association of dietary index for gut microbiota and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with diabetes or prediabetes. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(7): 107111 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.107111]
|
22
|
-
"This is one of my best ever published work and the whole process of publication has been great except for slight delays in the peer reviews and the time from submission to publication. The journal should consider an online e-pub option as soon as the paper is accepted to avoid delays in online repository of the articles as delays may result in publication of similar papers prior to the publication of the WJD paper.
I wish all the best to the Journal."
-
Gagnon CA, Buchanan K, Deaver JM, Schmitt JA, Lahart IM, Shetty S, Ashraf AP, Pappachan JM. Pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(7): 106890 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.106890]
|
23
|
-
"The time interval between the first decision letter after the paper submission and the time it took to receive the final result after the re-review was relatively fast. I think the evaluations of the three reviewers were appropriate and fair. The paper revision process based on the reviewers' comments was very helpful in improving the quality of the paper. I would like to submit another paper that fits the scope of this journal in the future."
-
Bae EH, Lim SY, Kim BS, Han KD, Suh SH, Choi HS, Kim CS, Ma SK, Kim SW. Exercise intensity and the risk of end-stage renal disease in diabetes: A nationwide population-based study. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(7): 108344 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.108344]
|
24
|
-
"The evaluations by the reviewers were fair and reliable, and the revision of the paper based on the evaluation comments was very helpful in improving the quality of the paper. We were satisfied that the entire process, from paper submission to peer review, revision, re-examination, and publication, was conducted fairly and quickly, and that they actively worked to enable the publication of high-quality papers. It is expected that this will lead to a leap forward as a better journal."
-
Choi HS, Kim B, Han KD, Suh SH, Kim CS, Bae EH, Ma SK, Kim SW. Impact of longer diabetes duration and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate on cardiovascular complications and mortality: A nationwide population-based study. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(7): 107647 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.107647]
|
25
|
-
"The submission process was found to be highly satisfactory. From the preliminary evaluation to the subsequent peer review, modifications, and ultimate approval, each phase of the procedure was meticulously rigorous. The reviewers' comments were instrumental in enhancing the quality of the manuscript. The editorial team demonstrated commendable responsibility, addressing issues in a timely manner and providing comprehensive feedback. In conclusion, the present submission process has proven to be highly satisfactory."
-
Zuo DB, Wang CH, Sang M, Sun XD, Chen GP, Ji KK. Stem cell therapy for diabetes: Advances, prospects, and challenges. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(7): 107344 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.107344]
|
26
|
-
"This journal features rapid review and efficient editorial processing, making it ideal for publication. The editors are friendly and always respond promptly to correspondence. The reviewers raised highly professional and pertinent questions, pinpointing key issues effectively. The reviewers raised highly professional and pertinent questions, pinpointing key issues effectively. We sincerely appreciate all the experts for their dedicated efforts and valuable contributions."
-
Pu WF, Yang X, Wang XQ, Guo XG, Yang MY. Stemness signatures reflect prognostic disturbances in gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(7): 107211 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.107211]
|
27
|
-
"We sincerely appreciate the substantial assistance from the reviewers and editors for this paper. Having undergone three rounds of review, the quality of the manuscript has been significantly improved with each revision. WJD is a truly excellent journal that strikes a balance between academic rigor and accessibility for authors. We look forward to the opportunity to submit future work to WJD again."
-
Yang TS, Du M, Luo LY, Lin L, Luo XL. Extra-renal role of urate transporter-1 in diabetes. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(7): 107673 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i7.107673]
|
28
|
-
"Dear journal editors,
Thank you for your help throughout the entire process.
In the final editing stage of the article, Figure 2-5 were not arranged according to the previous plan. Some images in Figures were enlarged to achieve high resolution, which affected the aesthetics and readability of the Figures. Of course, this is just my personal opinion.
Sincerely
Ke Xu"
-
Xiao M, Luo ZY, Yu AR, Xu K, Zhou W. BTNL9 exerts anti-cancer effects by inhibiting CDC20 to induce G2/M arrest in pancreatic cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(7): 108274 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.108274]
|
29
|
-
"I would like to commend the editorial team for the exceptionally efficient and seamless submission process. The platform was intuitive, guidelines were clear, and communication was timely at every stage. This professionalism significantly reduced the usual stress associated with manuscript submission and allowed me to focus on the content itself. Such a positive experience reflects the journal’s commitment to supporting authors. Thank you for making this process remarkably smooth and pleasant—it’s greatly appreciated!"
-
Liu QJ, Zhang JC, Wang YF, Zou MH, Zhou WX, Lu Y, Feng XC, Liu H. Correlation of radiotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(7): 107815 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.107815]
|
30
|
-
"This journal is amazing. The process is so smooth and so quick. The help desk, the editors and all the staff working here are so helpful. Their responses are always quick and so full of information. You will not feel any hurdles or any confusion here. I highly recommend this journal. Fully satisfied with it. Thankyou very much to all the staff working here in this journal. I had an amazing experience with this journal. Will be looking forward to publish more papers with this journal in future."
-
Hussain MM, Wang JM, Zhai AQ, Li FY, Hu HJ. Comparison of prognostic factors and their differences in intrahepatic, hilar, and distal cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(7): 107995 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.107995]
|
31
|
-
"Thank you for the opportunity. The publishing process for this manuscript was thorough and allowed the authors of this project to better improve the quality of their writing through peer review that was rigorous. We hope to continue receiving such wonderful feedback on future projects and look forward to other opportunities."
-
Huilgol DK, Lucke-Wold B. Beyond numbers: Public health insurance and oesophageal cancer mortality risk. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(7): 107460 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.107460]
|
32
|
-
"Publishing with World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology has been a thoroughly positive experience. The editorial office is remarkably efficient. Reviewers were clearly experts in the field; their comments were detailed, balanced, and helped us strengthen both methodology and interpretation without requesting unnecessary experiments. The copy-editing team demonstrated exceptional professionalism—every linguistic nuance was refined, tables were reformatted for clarity, and proofs were returned promptly for final approval. Open-access fees were transparent and competitive. We therefore commend the journal for its commitment to scientific rigor, author service, and global dissemination, and we look forward to submitting future work to this venue."
-
Zhong MY, Jian GL, Ye JY, Chen KX, Huang WJ. Ultrasound diagnosis of small bowel adenocarcinoma in Crohn’s disease: A case report and review of literature. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(7): 108258 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.108258]
|
33
|
-
"I am very satisfied with the entire process of publishing the paper. The editing speed was very fast, the comments from the reviewers were very fair, and the article was processed very promptly. The editor's attitude is very good, in short, I am very satisfied. We are also very satisfied with the production and layout of our article. We greatly appreciate the joint efforts of the editor and the magazine, and hope that the magazine will continue to improve."
-
Chen B, Chen J, Chen ZT, Feng ZP, Lv HB, Jiang GP. Genetic evidence for the causal influence of inflammatory factors on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma risk. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(7): 108455 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i7.108455]
|
34
|
-
"Thank you again for recognizing the results of our reserch,the
magazine is professional and has a short response time. Website editing interface is quick and efficient.Short cycle time for receiving articles.Editors and experts are friendly and professional.Hopefully, in the near future, we will have new results to continue to submit to the journal.We hope World Journal Clinical Cases get better and better."
-
Xu LX, Kong YC. Ocular siderosis secondary to occult intraocular foreign body causing secondary glaucoma: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2025; 13(25): 104134 [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i25.104134]
|
35
|
-
"We truly appreciate the insightful comments and constructive feedback from the editor and reviewers, which have greatly enhanced the overall quality of our manuscript. I hope to minimize the time from manuscript submission to final publication. In this case, the time from acceptance to final publication has exceeded two months, which is longer than that of most journals."
-
Jiang L, Ma RX, He ES, Zheng XY, Peng X, Ma WH, Li Y, li HW, Zhang XY, Ji JY, Li YJ, Qu SL, Li LJ, Gong ZT. DNA methylation regulates the extinction of fear memory. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(7): 107524 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i7.107524]
|
36
|
-
"The authors are satisfied with the whole process of editing and publishing our study.We thank the editors and reviewers of this prestigious journal for their time and excellent work. We are confident that our next studies submitted to this journal will maintain the high quality of editing and publication. Thank you very much for your time and expertise"
-
Aliaga Ramos J, Carvalho D, Nunes Arantes V. Innovative schemes of colonoscopy bowel preparation with oral lactulose: Optimizing traditional standards to improve colonoscopy quality. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(7): 107168 [PMID: 40677577 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107168]
|
37
|
-
"The authors are satisfied with the whole process of editing and publishing our study.We thank the editors and reviewers of this prestigious journal for their time and excellent work. We are confident that our next studies submitted to this journal will maintain the high quality of editing and publication. Thank you very much for your time and expertise"
-
Aliaga Ramos J, Arantes VN. Impact of gastric neoplasms location on clinical outcome of patients treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(7): 107911 [PMID: 40677570 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.107911]
|
38
|
-
"We sincerely appreciate the journal’s dedication to scientific quality and peer review. However, we would like to suggest shortening the overall review time to improve publication efficiency. Long waiting periods may delay the dissemination of important findings. In addition, we recommend reducing or waiving article processing charges, as high fees may pose financial barriers for early-career researchers or authors from low-income regions."
-
Lin HY, Tan QH. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing may assist diagnosis of osteomyelitis caused by Mycobacterium houstonense: A case report. World J Orthop 2024; 15(11): 1095-1100 [PMID: 39600859 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i11.1095]
|
39
|
-
"I am very satisfied with the entire publication process of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. The online submission system was efficient and user-friendly, allowing smooth manuscript tracking and communication. The peer review process was rigorous yet constructive, providing insightful feedback that significantly improved the clarity and scientific quality of our manuscript.
The editorial team demonstrated professionalism and responsiveness throughout. The editing quality, PDF formatting, and online full-text presentation were all excellent. Figures and tables were precisely prepared and visually clear. I particularly appreciated the journal's strict adherence to academic norms, ethical standards, and the transparency of its academic misconduct checks.
Furthermore, the time from submission to publication was reasonable and well managed. Overall, I had a highly positive experience with the journal and would gladly consider submitting future work to WJGO. I thank the editorial office and reviewers for their valuable contribution to improving the manuscript and supporting its publication."
-
Bae SU. Elevating surgical standards: The role of intraperitoneal isoperistaltic side-to-side anastomosis in colon cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(6): 106645 [PMID: 40547143 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i6.106645]
|
40
|
-
"I am very satisfied with the entire editorial and publication process. The submission system was user-friendly, and the peer review reports were constructive, professional, and helped improve the manuscript quality. The editorial team provided timely and clear communication throughout, and the editing quality of both the article text and visual elements (figures and tables) was excellent.
The final PDF and online full-text formats were well-prepared and professionally presented. I also appreciated the transparency of academic norms and ethical standards during the process, including the academic misconduct screening. The time from submission to publication was appropriate and efficient.
Overall, it was a smooth and positive publishing experience, and I would be pleased to submit to this journal again in the future."
-
Bae SU. Central vascular ligation and complete mesocolon excision vs D3 lymphadenectomy: Standardization of surgical technique. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(4): 103704 [PMID: 40291862 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.103704]
|
41
|
-
"Your platform's full-process service is commendable! The manuscript submission system is convenient and smooth with clear guidelines. Peer review comments are professional and pertinent, pointing out clear directions for revisions. During the revision phase, editors communicate efficiently and answer questions patiently. Language editing ensures both standardization and rigor, significantly improving manuscript quality.
Publication fee standards are open and transparent with no hidden costs, and explanations are detailed. The electronic and online publishing processes are efficient, with short release cycles and trackable progress. The entire process reflects professional competence and an author-centric service philosophy, making it trustworthy!"
-
Chen CN, Fan XY, Yang CM, Zhang XH, Liu J. Refractory chronic diarrhea complicated with optic neuritis in a young woman: A case report. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(7): 106208 [PMID: 40677575 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.106208]
|
42
|
-
"The journal has published my editorial following a thorough peer-review process. The publication adhered to rigorous academic and scholarly standards, and I am grateful to the editorial team for their valuable support throughout. I hope readers will find the editorial thought-provoking, both in stimulating critical thinking and enhancing clinical practice. I also hope it will inspire further research on the topic. Professor Samy Azer"
-
Azer SA. Hemostasis: Role of PuraStat® in the prevention and management of gastrointestinal bleeding. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(7): 106725 [PMID: 40677579 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.106725]
|
43
|
-
"The article was very well done processed and timely published. The articles appeared perfect and the format was nice.
We appreciate the dedication of editor , reviewer , editing and publishing section that made our work become available online very soon. Thank you every one very much for your time.
Kind regards,
T"
-
Chaemsupaphan T, Shir Ali M, Fung C, Paramsothy S, Leong RW. Endocytoscopy in real-time assessment of histological and endoscopic activity in ulcerative colitis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(7): 108082 [PMID: 40677581 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.108082]
|
44
|
-
"In the submission of this study, the editor demonstrated a strong sense of responsibility and actively communicated with the authors of the research. The peer reviewers also demonstrated a high level of professionalism. We sincerely thank the editor and all reviewers for their contributions to the publication of this mini-review. We hope to continue working with World Journal of Psychiatry and contribute more scholarly work in the future."
-
Sun YF, Zhang Q, Wang J, Zhou ZH. Neuroimaging and neuroelectrophysiological features of music's effects on anhedonia in major depressive disorder: A minireview. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(7): 107721 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i7.107721]
|
45
|
-
"I find that overly rigid initial formatting requirements discourage submissions toy your journals, which are otherwise high-quality. Allowing flexibility in manuscript layout prior to peer review and permitting final adjustments post-acceptance would reduce barriers to submission and encourage broader participation. Relaxing early formatting guidelines may therefore improve submission rates, enhance global accessibility, and facilitate author engagement."
-
Negoi I. Correction to "Personalized surveillance in colorectal cancer: Integrating circulating tumor DNA and artificial intelligence into post-treatment follow-up". World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(25): 109912 [PMID: 40656614 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i25.109912]
|
46
|
-
"We are deeply satisfied with the submission process to the World Journal of Psychiatry and Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. From the user-friendly online submission system to the editorial team's prompt and professional communication (all inquiries were addressed within 48 hours), and the rigorous yet transparent peer review—particularly the constructive feedback from reviewers which significantly enhanced our manuscript's quality. The final published PDF exhibited impeccable typesetting aligned with international academic standards. This seamless blend of efficiency and scholarly rigor makes us enthusiastically recommend this publishing experience to fellow researchers."
-
Li X, Xiong LP, Zhang Y, Zhao TT, Zhang CY. From operating room to recovery: Evidence and gaps in cardiac surgical nursing integrative psychological support. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(7): 107103 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i7.107103]
|
47
|
-
"A Trustworthy Platform for Cutting-Edge Psychiatric Research
As an author(Jiang-Bo Li) who recently published in World Journal of Psychiatry, I am impressed by the journal's rigorous peer-review process. The reviewers provided exceptionally constructive feedback that significantly strengthened my work, demonstrating their expertise in the field. The editorial team maintained clear communication throughout, with prompt responses to queries and transparent manuscript tracking.
What stands out most is the journal's commitment to scientific integrity. From meticulous reference checks to conflict-of-interest verification, every step reflects adherence to the highest publication standards. The immediate indexing of articles in major databases further enhances the credibility and visibility of published research.
I particularly appreciate how World Journal of Psychiatry with clinical relevance, making it an ideal venue for research that bridges academia and practice. My positive experience confirms its status as a premier journal in psychiatric sciences, and I would confidently recommend it to colleagues."
-
Li JB, Rong W. Severe anxiety, depression, and sleep disorders worsen prognosis in patients with septic shock. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(7): 107038 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i7.107038]
|
48
|
-
"I am truly grateful for the highly efficient and professional editorial process I experienced. From the moment I submitted my manuscript, every step felt well-organized and streamlined, which greatly eased the often stressful process of academic publishing.
The reviewers’ comments were particularly invaluable—they went beyond surface-level feedback, offering deep insights that pinpointed both strengths I hadn’t fully recognized and areas needing refinement. Their suggestions, whether on theoretical framework, data analysis, or clarity of argument, were constructive and actionable, ultimately helping me strengthen the manuscript significantly. It was clear they’d engaged closely with the work, which made their input all the more meaningful."
-
Gao RX, Wang XL, Tian MJ, Li XM, Zhang JJ, Wang JJ, Gao J, Zhang C, Li ZT. Construction and validation of a machine learning algorithm-based predictive model for difficult colonoscopy insertion. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(7): 108307 [PMID: 40677572 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.108307]
|
49
|
-
"The submission system is easy to use and not complicated. The reviewers' comments are very valuable. The submission process is efficient. The process is very timely and the opinions obtained are constructive. We gained a lot of assistance from the editors. They are very helpful and provide suggestions. Thank you."
-
Lin MC, Huang SS. Diagnosis and etiology of poststroke depression: A review. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(7): 107598 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i7.107598]
|
50
|
-
"The submission system is highly convenient, and the editors have been both prompt and professional in their handling, making a significant contribution to improving the quality of the manuscript. The only drawback is the author feedback section, which is rather unfriendly—one has to pad it with filler just to meet the 50-character minimum."
-
Li XR, Kong MW, Guan XF, Gao Y. Revolutionizing upper gastrointestinal disease diagnosis: The transformative role of artificial intelligence in endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(7): 108293 [PMID: 40677567 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i7.108293]
|