|
1
|
-
"The editorial office provided professional and efficient support throughout the publication process. Communication was clear and timely, and the editorial team handled the manuscript with great care and professionalism. I sincerely appreciate the editor’s and editorial staff’s efforts, assistance, and coordination, which contributed to a smooth and positive publication experience. Thank you for your valuable support and service."
-
Li JP, Chen XY, Wang Q, Du YY, Guo TT, Lin JN, Fu JY, Xie ML, Liu JH, Gao JL, Wang MM, Luo S. Regenerative-system dysfunction in organ fibrosis: Maladaptive regeneration, fibrotic memory, and therapeutic reprogramming. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(10): 125689 [DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.125689]
|
|
2
|
-
"Dear Editorial Team,
Thank you for giving authors the opportunity to provide feedback\. I would like to offer some comments based not only on my experience with this particular manuscript, but also on my broader experience as an academic author\.
I have been involved in clinical research and scientific publishing for approximately 20 years and, to date, have authored 287 publications indexed in PubMed\. I have also published 87 manuscripts through the F6Publishing/BPG platform\. I therefore have considerable experience both with scientific publishing in general and with your editorial system specifically\.
Over the past few years, and particularly more recently, I have found the BPG manuscript submission, processing, and revision pathway increasingly complex and time\-consuming\. I believe it has now reached a level at which the administrative burden risks becoming a significant deterrent to experienced authors and clinical researchers\.
In a conventional editorial workflow, the process is relatively straightforward: manuscript submission, technical and editorial checks, peer review, editorial decision, author revision and rebuttal, possible reassessment by reviewers, and a final editorial decision\. Scientific rigor does not necessarily require procedural complexity\.
In contrast, the current BPG workflow appears to contain as many as 26 separate processing stages before publication, including multiple editorial\-office decisions, revision checks, repeated processing steps, and additional assessments\. From an author’s perspective, many of these stages appear redundant and substantially increase the time required to manage a manuscript without an obvious corresponding improvement in scientific quality\.
This became particularly evident with our recently published paper\. We underwent four rounds of rebuttal and produced more than 30 pages of responses and explanations\. In practical terms, my co\-authors and I spent more time managing the revision and rebuttal process than we spent writing the manuscript itself\.
I am also concerned about the increasingly prominent role of automated AI\-based manuscript assessments\. Authors are screened for AI\-generated content, yet during the revision process they may also receive extensive AI\-generated Manuscript Quality Assessment Reports in addition to reviewers’ comments and editorial comments\. In our experience, these reports can extend to approximately 20 pages\.
There is an additional issue that deserves clarification\. If an unpublished manuscript is submitted by the publisher to external or proprietary AI systems, authors should be clearly informed about which system is being used, whether manuscript content is retained, whether it can be incorporated into training or other datasets, and whether such processing could subsequently affect similarity or AI\-detection assessments, including iThenticate results\. For unpublished scientific work, transparency regarding confidentiality and data handling is essential\.
The paradox is difficult to overlook: authors are being scrutinized closely for their use of AI while increasingly extensive AI\-generated assessments are being incorporated into the publisher’s own editorial workflow\. AI can undoubtedly assist editorial processes, but it should reduce the workload for authors and editors rather than create an additional layer of mandatory responses on top of conventional peer review\.
This experience has led my research group to reconsider future invitations from BPG journals\. This is unfortunate because I have had a long publishing relationship with the group, as demonstrated by my 87 previous publications through F6Publishing\.
I would therefore strongly encourage the President and senior management of BPG to critically reassess the entire manuscript pathway, particularly the number of processing stages and the role of AI\-generated assessments\. The objective should be to streamline the system while preserving rigorous peer review, editorial oversight, research integrity, and publication quality\.
Clinical researchers are frequently practicing physicians\. Time spent navigating unnecessary administrative complexity is time taken away from patients, research, teaching, and the production of new scientific work\. A rigorous editorial system should therefore also be efficient and proportionate\.
My PhD mentor taught me a principle that has remained with me throughout my academic career: write as though you had to pay for every word you use\. I believe the same principle could usefully be applied to editorial workflows—every additional requirement, report, and processing step should have a clear purpose and add demonstrable value\.
Reducing unnecessary complexity would not lower scientific standards\. On the contrary, I believe it would result in a more focused, professional, author\-friendly, and scientifically rigorous publication process\.
I offer these comments constructively, as a long\-standing author who has published extensively with BPG and who would genuinely like to see the system improve\.
Kind regards,
Marco Zeppieri, MD, PhD"
-
Capobianco M, Cappellani F, Enaholo ES, Zeppieri M. Stem cell secretome- and extracellular vesicle-based therapies for retinal pathologies. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(10): 125852 [DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.125852]
|
|
3
|
-
"Overall, it was a genuinely positive and rewarding experience, and I truly appreciate the opportunity to contribute. The only issue I encountered is that the magazine's formatting and detailed submission requirements are overly complicated, time-consuming, and sometimes confusing. Streamlining these guidelines and providing clearer instructions would greatly improve the experience for future authors and make the submission process much smoother."
-
Liu Y, Wu JF, Xu MY, Kang J, Ye AH, Liu B, Liu KZ. Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells alleviate fluoxetine-resistant depression-like behaviors in mice by multi-target effects in the hippocampus. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(10): 124640 [DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.124640]
|
|
4
|
-
"I would like to express my sincere appreciation to the journal’s editorial team and reviewers for their excellent organization and professionalism in handling our manuscript. The online submission process was clear and straightforward, and communication was effective and timely. I also greatly appreciate the efforts of the editors and reviewers in providing precise and constructive scientific comments that contributed to improving the quality of our manuscript. The peer review process was objective and fair, and the feedback provided was helpful and clear, with appropriate responses to our inquiries. Overall, our experience with the journal was positive and professional. I thank the entire team for their support and commitment to high academic standards, and I look forward to future opportunities for collaboration and publication with the journal."
-
Al-Karawi AS, Al-Budairi AS. Soluble immunosuppressive checkpointome of mesenchymal stromal cells: Immunoregulatory mechanisms and a conceptual framework for potency assessment. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(10): 125673 [DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.125673]
|
|
5
|
-
"The F6Publishing system (new to me), was initially a bit complicated to navigate, with many detailed requirements. However, whenever I contacted the responsible editors, I received helpful assistance and guidance throughout the submission and revision process.
The peer review was constructive and helped improve our manuscript.
The only aspect that could be improved was the rather long period between manuscript acceptance and its online publication, including DOI activation."
-
Funda D, Drabonova B, Golias J, Tejklova T, Cisarova R, Bartosova J, Drastich P. Gluten-free diet reduces severity of dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in BALB/c mice. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(46): 121572 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.121572]
|
|
6
|
-
"We are very pleased with the final outcome of our submission. Regarding the journal's credibility, we find it to be highly reputable within our field. Its rigorous editorial standards and high visibility ensure that our research will reach a wide and relevant audience, which significantly enhances the impact of our work.
As for the peer review process, we were particularly impressed by the professionalism and depth of the reviewers' comments. The feedback was not only constructive but also scientifically insightful, helping us to refine our arguments and strengthen the quality of the manuscript substantially. The entire workflow, from submission to acceptance, was handled with remarkable efficiency and transparency.
Overall, we have full confidence in the publication and believe this journal is an excellent venue for our research."
-
Kang JH, Liu JJ, Liang PP, Liu HL, Qu FY, Nie PF, Long WJ. Protein acylation and heart failure: A review of novel lysine modifications in cardiac pathology. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(10): 124339 [DOI: 10.4330/wjc.124339]
|
|
7
|
-
"We sincerely thank the editorial team for ensuring a smooth and efficient manuscript processing experience. The constructive comments and suggestions provided by the Editor and reviewers were highly valuable and helped us substantially improve the quality of the manuscript.
The reviewers’ comments encouraged us to strengthen several important aspects of the manuscript, including the presentation of relevant histological images and a more comprehensive review of the literature. The critical comments generated through the AI-assisted manuscript review system were also helpful in identifying key areas that required further clarification, improvement, and revision.
Overall, we found the entire publication process to be smooth, efficient, and highly constructive. We sincerely appreciate the efforts of the Editor, reviewers, and editorial team in helping us improve the manuscript and bring it to its final form."
-
Sachdeva S, Sirohi N, Mandal K, Bansal D, Vaithiyam V, Dalal A, Goyal S, Sakhuja P. Esophageal stricture due to amyloidosis in plasma cell dyscrasia: A case report and review of literature. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(28): 127546 [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.127546]
|
|
8
|
-
"We sincerely thank the reviewers for their comments and suggestions, which have greatly helped us improve the quality of this manuscript. We are also grateful to the editorial office for their valuable feedback and efficient handling of our submission. Their careful review and guidance throughout the revision process were instrumental in bringing this work to successful publication."
-
Chen Z, Chen H, Jie B, Peng T, Lin Y, Geng Y, Shen Y, Deng Y, Xie D, Yang L, Ouyang S. Risk factors and predictive model for hepatitis B virus deoxyribonucleic acid elevation in mid-to-late pregnancy with low viremia. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(10): 124577 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.124577]
|
|
9
|
-
"The whole peer review process was professional and quick. The reviewers' comments were clear helped us improve the manuscript to a higher level. The editor team provided thorough and detailed comments for our small mistakes. This make the format of our manuscript much better. All the communications we made with the editor team received timely feedback. We are grateful for the work of the editor team and reviewers."
-
Huang XY, Zhao L, He H, Peng R, Xue H, Lai SM, Wu WX, Qiu XX, Cai XH, He JH, Qin WJ, Zhou WT, Wu WQ, Lin YP. Predicting three-year risk of incident colorectal precancerous conditions using non-invasive predictors and machine-learning algorithms: A multi-center retrospective study. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(46): 121223 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.121223]
|
|
10
|
-
"I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the Editorial Office for their careful and professional work throughout the publication of my article. The editors handled my manuscript with great diligence, provided timely and constructive feedback, and communicated clearly at every stage. Their meticulous attention to detail and dedication greatly improved the quality of my paper and made the publication process smooth and positive. I truly appreciate their hard work and support, and I wish the journal continued success."
-
Li J, Chen L. Minireview of relationship between perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances and hypertension. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(10): 125866 [DOI: 10.4330/wjc.125866]
|
|
11
|
-
"We thank the editor and reviewers for their careful work. The reviewers’ comments have substantially improved the manuscript. The reviewer suggested adjusting the structure of the review, and we accordingly developed the content in a progressive manner, making the manuscript easier to read and understand. The initial review comments were received approximately 7 weeks after submission, and the processing efficiency is reasonable."
-
Tang YJ, Wang CX, Wen Y, Tian RD, Wan DW, Pan ZQ, Liu KY, Xie YX, Ao J, He YH. Imbalance of the coagulation-anticoagulation-fibrinolytic system: Pathogenesis and therapeutic approaches in progressive liver injury. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(10): 124763 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.124763]
|
|
12
|
-
"I sincerely appreciate the editorial team of the *World Journal of Clinical Oncology* for their professionalism, responsiveness, and support throughout the publication process. The peer-review and editorial processes were constructive, transparent, and instrumental in improving the quality of our manuscript. I am grateful to the editors, reviewers, and production team for their dedication to scientific publishing and for making this a positive publication experience."
-
Mbuthia O, Mahjabeen I, Kayani M, Mehmood A, Obiero J, Matsumoto T, Bosire K, Mureithi M. Helicobacter pylori virulence gene expression defines a stage-associated transcriptional signature in gastric cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(10): 125453 [DOI: 10.5306/wjco.125453]
|
|
13
|
-
"The authors are grateful and would like to thank the entire editorial team, the reviewers, the production team for a great job in reviewing our article and getting the manuscript published. We also appreciate the direct and clear means of communication, the thoroughness, and the transparence throughout the peer review process."
-
Adeniran O, Almusabeh H, Adekolu A, Diab K, Hadam J, Bham NS, Sobani ZA. Tirzepatide for refractory post-fundoplication dumping syndrome: A case report. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(45): 122564 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.122564]
|
|
14
|
-
"Dear Editor and Reviewers,
Thank you sincerely for your time and exceptional effort in reviewing our manuscript. Your insightful comments and constructive feedback have significantly improved the overall quality, clarity, and depth of our work.
We deeply appreciate your guidance throughout this process, which has greatly strengthened our arguments and refined our presentation. The manuscript is much stronger as a result of your expertise, and we are grateful for your invaluable contribution to enhancing our research."
-
Sood M, Modi S, Sood I. Performance of PIM, PRISM, and PELOD scores in a resource-limited North Indian paediatric intensive care unit. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(4): 120054 [DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.120054]
|
|
15
|
-
"The whole peer review process went smoothly and efficiently. The reviewers put forward detailed, thoughtful and constructive comments from multiple professional perspectives. These suggestions helped me identify the deficiencies in the manuscript, optimize the logical framework, supplement relevant discussion content and greatly improve the academic quality of this work. I really appreciate the hard work of the reviewers and the journal editorial team."
-
Yang Y, Liu HD, Yang XY, Li X, Cui LJ. Recurrence risk prediction of small-molecule drugs plus chemo in postoperative gastric cancer: Retrospective analysis via molecular markers. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 122160 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.122160]
|
|
16
|
-
"The entire publication process was efficient and professional. The online submission system was convenient, peer review was completed in a timely manner, and the editorial and production teams were responsive and supportive during proofreading. We appreciate the journal's open-access policy and look forward to collaborating with World Journal of Clinical Oncology in the future."
-
Liu ZF, Jiang JH, Huang WJ, Wang Y, Fan GW, Chen BG, Lan ZE, Xu LH, Cui CH. Plasma methylation markers for early colorectal cancer detection. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(10): 125345 [DOI: 10.5306/wjco.125345]
|
|
17
|
-
"We thank the Editoral Office and the Reviewers for their professional peer review, together with the high-efficient process for publishing the article entitled "Characterization of the cellular and transcriptomic landscapes of natural killer cells in hematopoietic microenvironment of myelodysplastic syndrome" in World Journal of Clinical Oncology. We appreciate the good comments as well as the constructive suggesions, which help improve the quality of the manuscript."
-
Liu SY, Feng XM, Chen ZY, Chen ZQ, Shang YR, Linnebacher M, Wang YX, Zhang SS, Cai M, Zhang LS. Characterization of the cellular and transcriptomic landscapes of natural killer cells in hematopoietic microenvironment of myelodysplastic syndrome. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(10): 126647 [DOI: 10.5306/wjco.126647]
|
|
18
|
-
"The quality of the professional opinions provided by the journal's editors is extremely high. Their comments are constructive, specific, and helpful for improving the manuscript. When authors encounter problems, the feedback from communicating with the editors is very prompt, and the editors are responsive and courteous. The review process is also very fast, which reduces unnecessary waiting and makes the submission experience more efficient."
-
Liu ZN, Li MM, Ping Y, Zhao QT, Wang LP, Zhang Y. Integrated single-cell transcriptomic analysis of brain and lymph node metastases in non-small cell lung cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(10): 126162 [DOI: 10.5306/wjco.126162]
|
|
19
|
-
"We highly appreciate the efficient work from all editors, reviewers and language editors during the publication of our manuscript. The peer review process was rigorous, and the reviewers’ suggestions were insightful, which helped us optimize the experimental design and presentation of our results. The communication with editorial office was responsive. We trust this journal and would consider submitting our future work here."
-
Zhang Q, Yang RH, An XR, Chang HC. Vitamin-mediated cancer immune reprogramming: Context-dependent mechanisms and translational perspectives. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(10): 125846 [DOI: 10.5306/wjco.125846]
|
|
20
|
-
"We would like to express our sincere appreciation to the editorial team and peer reviewers for their time and efforts throughout the publication process. We particularly appreciate the constructive comments and thoughtful suggestions provided by the peer reviewers, which helped us refine our manuscript and enhance its overall quality. We are also grateful to the editorial team for their professionalism, careful attention, and assistance at each stage of the publication process. We are very pleased to have published our research in the World Journal of Hepatology and sincerely thank everyone involved for their support."
-
Khaznadar F, Bojanić K, Khaznadar O, Jurić A, Hefer M, Kralik K, Petrović A, Hrženjak A, Lončar A, Steiner J, Smolić M, Smolić R. Changes in lipid biomarkers, liver stiffness and steatosis following sodium-glucose cotransporter two inhibitor therapy in type two diabetes. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(10): 125505 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.125505]
|
|
21
|
-
"Thank you very much for the opportunity to publish my manuscript. We (the authors) appreciate the editor's and reviewers' time and effort. The peer review process was helpful, fair, and constructive. The comments provided valuable suggestions for improving my manuscript. We are satisfied with the overall review process and appreciate the journal's professional editorial services and support."
-
Jaya LOI, Rykowski P, Bartkowiak M, Kruk E, Chodurska M, Lewandowski Z, Krasnodębski M, Grąt M. Computed tomography volumetry vs three-dimensional surface scanning for liver graft size estimation using explant liver mass. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(10): 121142 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.121142]
|
|
22
|
-
"I am pleased to provide this comment following the online publication of my article in the journal. Overall, my experience throughout the submission, peer review, and production process has been highly positive. The editorial office maintained clear and timely communication at every stage, and the online submission system was user-friendly and reliable. The peer review process was conducted in a fair and objective manner; the reviewers’ comments were specific, constructive, and directly helpful in strengthening the clarity and rigor of the manuscript. I also appreciate the journal’s transparent editorial procedures and its adherence to rigorous academic standards. The production quality of the published article, including the PDF and online full text, is satisfactory. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the editorial team and the reviewers for their professionalism and dedication. I would certainly consider submitting to this journal again and recommend it to colleagues in the field."
-
Yu W, Dai ZS, Li YH, Li MP, Li J, Jiao KX, Ma J, Li Y. Proactive antithyroid therapy improves survival in hyperthyroidism-induced liver injury: A real-world cohort study. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(10): 123267 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.123267]
|
|
23
|
-
"We sincerely thank the reviewers for their valuable comments, insightful observations, and constructive recommendations, which have significantly contributed to improving the quality of our manuscript. We highly appreciate their careful evaluation and thoughtful suggestions, which have helped us clarify important aspects, strengthen the scientific content, and improve the overall structure and presentation of our work. We consider the peer review process to have been fair, objective, and highly beneficial."
-
Peltec A, Buga D, Hotineanu A, Wedemeyer H. Impact of hepatitis delta virus infection on waiting list outcomes: A competing-risks analysis. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(10): 124709 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.124709]
|
|
24
|
-
"During the first round of external review, we felt the comments from one reviewer were not entirely objective or thorough. In contrast, the feedback from the Chinese reviewer was genuinely constructive — it prompted us to examine our subject in greater depth and has made the manuscript substantially stronger. We are truly grateful for the care and diligence shown by the editorial team."
-
Zhou XY, Chen T, Liang J, Yue JQ, Wu LL, Li HM, Liu ZH, Peng CJ, Liu GW. Aggressive pediatric solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas presented as acute abdomen: A case report and review of literature. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 123199 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.123199]
|
|
25
|
-
"We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the editorial team and peer reviewers of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. Their constructive feedback and professional guidance significantly improved the quality of our manuscript. The entire submission, review, and publication process was smooth . We look forward to the opportunity to contribute to this journal again in the future."
-
Ma YX, Zhou CM, Yilihaer Y, Jiang TM, Ruze R, Shao YM, Wen H, Aji T. Diagnosis and surgical decision-making in hepatic hemangioma: From venous malformation overlap to artificial intelligence-assisted multimodality imaging. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 123208 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.123208]
|
|
26
|
-
"We sincerely thank the editorial team and reviewers for their support throughout the publication process. The reviewers’ constructive comments helped improve the clarity and quality of our manuscript, and we appreciated the editors’ timely communication and assistance. Overall, we are pleased with our publishing experience with the World Journal of Gastroenterology."
-
Liu K, Zhang XH, Zhou XY, Liu YX, Pan SQ, Liu TX, Russell R, Wang XH, Yao YP, Zhao XJ, Sun HY, Ju CL, Liu JP, Liu ZL. Clinical features and biomarkers associated with ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(46): 123374 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.123374]
|
|
27
|
-
"I am very satisfied with the editorial and peer-review process of the article. The communication was clear and professional throughout, and the reviewers' comments were constructive and helpful. Their feedback contributed significantly to improving the quality and clarity of the manuscript. Overall, the process was efficient, thorough, and well organized."
-
Suárez Ferrer C, Abadía M, Crespo Sanchez MG, Rueda García JL, Olveira A, Romero M, Molero-Luis M, Martin-Arranz E, Sanchez-Azofra M, García A, Amiama Roig C, Poza Cordón J, García-Ramírez L, Martin-Arranz MD. Assessment of metabolic biomarkers associated with hepatic steatosis in Crohn’s disease. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(46): 121707 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.121707]
|
|
28
|
-
"The review and publication process of my manuscript went smoothly. The reviewers offered valuable and constructive suggestions that greatly improved the quality of this research work. During the proofreading stage, editors responded promptly to my inquiries. I sincerely thank all reviewers, editors and production staff for their dedicated and timely work."
-
Fang XH, Xie M, Rao W. Helicobacter pylori in solid organ transplantation: Challenges and treatment strategies. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(46): 122731 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.122731]
|
|
29
|
-
"We are very satisfied with the whole submission and peer-review process of this journal. The editorial office responded to our inquiries promptly throughout the procedure. The reviewers offered thoughtful, constructive and professional comments, which helped us substantially strengthen the presentation and interpretation of our results. We highly appreciate all the efforts from the editors and reviewers, and we are delighted that our manuscript has been accepted for publication."
-
Li QL, Jiang B, Liu TY, Qin T. Endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy combined with electrohydraulic lithotripsy for stump appendicitis with abscess and fecalith: A case report. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 123880 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.123880]
|
|
30
|
-
"I appreciate the editorial team’s efforts and the opportunity to publish our research in this journal. The publication process has provided a valuable experience. I hope the journal will continue to improve its editorial services, communication efficiency, and publication quality to better support authors and promote high-quality scientific research. Thank you for your work and support."
-
Zhang YB, Li YX, Zhang WD, Hou XB, Li R, Xia RY, Shen MW, Zou ZR, Zhuang GH. Cost-effectiveness of risk-stratified hepatocellular carcinoma screening using the age-male-albumin-bilirubin-platelets score-based stepwise enrichment approach in patients with cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(46): 121840 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.121840]
|
|
31
|
-
"The overall submission and publication process was well organized and professional. The peer-review process was constructive and helped us improve the scientific clarity and presentation of our manuscript. Communication with the editorial and production teams was clear and responsive throughout the process. We particularly appreciated the detailed guidance provided during revision and production. Overall, we had a positive experience with the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery."
-
Edizsoy A, Tahirli N, Tanyeri A, Tunçyürek P. Timing of ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract after loose seton drainage in complex anal fistulas. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 123763 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.123763]
|
|
32
|
-
"We thank the Editor and reviewers for their careful evaluation of our manuscript. The revision process was efficient and well organized: editorial correspondence was timely, the technical and formatting requirements were clearly documented, and the staff were helpful at each stage. Overall, this was a professional and rewarding publishing experience, and we appreciate the journal's commitment to improving the quality of published work."
-
Xiao T, Chew NW, Targher G, Byrne CD, Lip GY, Zhou XD, Zheng MH. Global epidemiology of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: 2026 update. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(46): 127449 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.127449]
|
|
33
|
-
"I am extremely satisfied with my overall experience with this journal. The editorial team has demonstrated a high level of professionalism, efficiency, and dedication throughout the manuscript submission, review, editing, and publication process. The communication has been clear, timely, and constructive, and the editorial guidance has been highly valuable in improving the quality of my manuscript. I particularly appreciate the journal's rigorous academic standards, transparent editorial procedures, and commitment to scientific excellence."
-
Tian L, Xu SS. Antibiotic-associated gut dysbiosis and intestinal failure in critically ill patients: Mechanisms and interventions. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(46): 123234 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.123234]
|
|
34
|
-
"We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the editorial office for recognizing and accepting our manuscript. From submission to peer review and final revision, we have been deeply impressed by the journal's rigorous academic standards, efficient review process, and the meticulous suggestions . We are especially grateful to the editor for the patient guidance on formatting and language polishing, which greatly improved the quality of our manuscript."
-
Zhou F, Diao HR, Zhang XX, Jin Y. Fluid management after hepatectomy: Pursuing precision recovery through balance. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 119633 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i10.119633]
|
|
35
|
-
"I am very satisfied with the entire process of my article from submission to publication, especially the efficiency with which the editors handled the manuscript, which greatly sped up the review process, as well as the reviewers' feedback and efficiency. Their constructive comments significantly improved the rigor and logic of the article. It would be even better if, when possible, the time from acceptance to formal publication could be shortened a bit. Thank you!"
-
Zheng QM, Chen CY, Zhang L, Sun JS, Wang HH, Xie Y, Guo QJ, Jiang WT. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy for recurrent neuroendocrine tumors after liver transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(45): 121126 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.121126]
|
|
36
|
-
"We are greatly satisfied with the overall publication process of World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. The peer review was rigorous and efficient, and the reviewers offered thoughtful and constructive suggestions that helped us significantly refine the content and presentation of our manuscript. The editorial office maintained timely and clear communication with us during every stage, and we really appreciate their patient and professional support. It has been a pleasant academic publishing experience for our team."
-
Ding WJ, Tang HZ, Zhou XR, Liu WH, Xu GR. Conservative management of a delayed esophagomediastinal fistula after endoscopic submucosal dissection: A case report. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 122861 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.122861]
|
|
37
|
-
"I would like to express my satisfaction with the whole publishing and peer review process of this press. The editorial office responded to my inquiries promptly, and the workflow of manuscript submission was clear and user-friendly. Reviewers offered fair, objective and constructive comments, which helped me correct deficiencies, optimize the content and greatly enhance the quality of my manuscript. Thanks to the editors and reviewers for their rigorous work."
-
Li LL, Chen FH, Wang HM, Han RY. Prognostic factors analysis of ultrasound-guided percutaneous puncture drainage in severe acute pancreatitis with peripancreatic fluid collection. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 122118 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.122118]
|
|
38
|
-
"The peer reviewers raised objective and constructive comments on our manuscript. Their suggestions helped us refine the description of the modified abdominal wall retractor and supplement relevant discussion about laparoscopic esophagojejunostomy. The editorial team kept efficient communication throughout the submission process. We highly appreciate the professional support from the journal."
-
Song B, Wang S, Du QG, Xue F, Mao ZJ, Wu YH. Modified abdominal wall retractor for total laparoscopic esophagojejunostomy in gastric cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 123136 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.123136]
|
|
39
|
-
"Our entire experience publishing in World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery has been highly positive. We sincerely appreciate the professional and efficient work of the editorial office, peer reviewers, and production team from Baishideng Publishing Group. Throughout the whole process, including manuscript submission, peer review, revision, language editing, proofreading and final online publication, the workflow was well organized and transparent. The reviewer comments were objective, rigorous and constructive, which effectively helped us improve the academic presentation and logical structure of our manuscript. The editorial staff responded promptly to our inquiries, the F6 submission system was user-friendly, and the production team performed careful proofreading and formatting. The journal strictly upholds academic publication ethics and maintains high academic standards. As a SCIE-indexed journal in the field of gastrointestinal surgery, WJGS provides an excellent open-access platform for disseminating clinical case reports and surgical research to peers worldwide. This was a pleasant publishing experience. We are truly grateful for the professional support from the editorial team. We are willing to submit future manuscripts to this journal and recommend it to researchers in the same field."
-
Xia ZL, Luo KC, Tang J, Sun L. Laparoscopic one-stage repair of concurrent Morgagni hernia and hiatus hernia: A case report and review of literature. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 123093 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.123093]
|
|
40
|
-
"Reduce some unnecessary and cumbersome revision comments. For example, previous revision comments requested adding some article deviation risk assessments, but the author did not reflect them in the manuscript after completion. It is not necessary to specify conditions for using a polishing agency, as this will increase the author's financial burden. The review process is still very efficient, and I hope it continues to be maintained."
-
Zhang X, Chen XR, Zhu YJ. Efficacy of pelvic floor peritoneal reconstruction after laparoscopic resection of middle and low rectal cancer: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 123122 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.123122]
|
|
41
|
-
"The World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a highly author-friendly and efficient journal, offering a fast and well-organized peer-review process. It provides a reliable and smooth publishing experience for clinical researchers, making it a great choice for timely dissemination of valuable surgical research. In addition, the journal's online submission and manuscript tracking system is highly intuitive and user-friendly, significantly streamlining the entire process."
-
Lu HH, Xie JH, Li XR. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy vs chemotherapy after R0 D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Meta-analysis of randomized trials. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 124385 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.124385]
|
|
42
|
-
"I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the editorial team and reviewers for their professional and efficient handling of my manuscript. The review process was rigorous yet constructive, and the comments I received greatly improved the quality of my work. I truly appreciate the timely communication and support throughout the submission and revision stages. This experience has been very positive, and I highly recommend this journal to colleagues seeking a fair and efficient publication process."
-
Si YJ, Ren NN, Wang JY, Hao XY, Wang ZJ, Li HX, Ge XF, An J, Shi XS, Shen T, Liang J, Ouyang XJ, Wang XY, Wang YG. Efficacy and safety of Huazhuojiedu decoction for gastric precancerous lesions after endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 122120 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.122120]
|
|
43
|
-
"I sincerely thank the editorial team, peer reviewers, and production staff for their professional and efficient handling of our manuscript. The journal is credible, the peer-review process was timely and constructive, and the responsible editor was diligent and helpful throughout. Overall, it was a very positive publication experience, and I would recommend this journal to colleagues."
-
Zhu TY, Yuan M, Wen XC, Tian CC, Han YH, Zheng C, Wu YT, Xia Q, Wang Y. Osthole exerts osteoprotective effect by activating ER, PI3K/AKT, MEK/ERK, and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways. World J Orthop 2026; 17(10): 121526 [DOI: 10.5312/wjo.121526]
|
|
44
|
-
"My overall experience with the journal has been satisfactory. The publication process was efficient, and the journal communicated its academic guidelines clearly. The peer-review process was valuable, and the publication timeline was reasonable. I appreciate the journal's commitment to maintaining quality and academic integrity. Overall I am well satisfied with the process."
-
Maurya P, Sirohiya P, Sahoo M, Puri S, Ratre BK, Singh R, Kumar B. Radiomics and anaesthetic planning: Quantitative imaging as a new frontier in preoperative risk assessment. World J Radiol 2026; 18(8): 121065 [PMID: 42676948 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.121065]
|
|
45
|
-
"The publication management is professional and rigorous. The editing process is transparent and the communication is timely. The strict process ensures the quality of the article.
Thank you for the serious and efficient work of the editing and production team. The language requirements are high, and the overall experience is very good."
-
Jia YF, Wang HN, Xu LQ, Sun R. Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in older adults: A clinical review. World J Orthop 2026; 17(10): 125554 [DOI: 10.5312/wjo.125554]
|
|
46
|
-
"The peer reviewers provided detailed and constructive comments that helped improve the transparency of the review methods, clarify treatment endpoints and denominators, and strengthen the discussion of prediction-model validation and hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance. The editorial and production teams responded to the revision and proof queries. I appreciated the opportunity to review the final proof and the availability of peer-review reports and author responses alongside the article. A consolidated checklist of administrative requirements at each stage would make the process even easier for authors."
-
Salman A. Precision stratification for hepatitis B functional cure: Biomarkers, machine learning and the combination-therapy era. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(27): 126695 [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.126695]
|
|
47
|
-
"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a credible open-access journal focused on gastrointestinal endoscopy, indexed in ESCI, PubMed, and PubMed Central. Its most notable strength is the fast and efficient peer review and publication process. Editorial handling was timely, reviewer comments were specific and constructive, and accepted articles were published online quickly, allowing research to reach readers and enter the citation stream promptly. The open-access format ensures free global accessibility. I found no significant shortcomings and would consider submitting again and recommend the journal to colleagues in the field."
-
Cao MK, Chen XY, Shen QY, Fan Z. Giant esophageal fibrovascular polyp with use of Sengstaken-Blakemore tube during surgery: A case report. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 18(10): 126399 [DOI: 10.4253/wjge.126399]
|
|
48
|
-
"The review process of this submission to the "World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy" was professional and standardized. The feedback from the editors and reviewers was objective and constructive. The review comments closely revolve around the key points of clinical research in gastrointestinal endoscopy, providing targeted revision suggestions for the research design, result interpretation, and literature citation, helping us improve the logic of the manuscript and enhance the academic rigor of the article. The editorial department responded promptly to communication, and the entire review process was transparent and efficient. We are generally satisfied with the peer review service this time. We are grateful to the editorial department and the reviewers for their time and professional guidance."
-
Wang YS, Hou M, Li ZY, Du ZJ, Liu JY. Therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for giant bile duct stones in a child: A case report. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 18(8): 118395 [DOI: 10.4253/wjge.118395]
|
|
49
|
-
"We would like to express our gratitude to the editorial office and reviewers. The peer review procedure was standardized, and the feedback was valuable for optimizing our research presentation. Communications with editors were smooth throughout the revision and production stages. We have gained a lot from this publication experience and recommend this journal to other orthopedic researchers."
-
Yu XS, Mao ZH, Qiu C, Zhang LZ, Chang ZQ. Perioperative management and neurological outcomes of traumatic spondyloptosis: A retrospective case series of 14 patients. World J Orthop 2026; 17(10): 125014 [DOI: 10.5312/wjo.125014]
|
|
50
|
-
"The peer review process was rigorous and professional. The reviewers provided valuable and constructive feedback that helped improve the quality of the manuscript. We are very satisfied with the overall publication experience and truly appreciate the time and effort that the editorial team has dedicated to the process. We look forward to the opportunity to work with the journal again in the future."
-
Sun SY, Elliott T, Johnstone M, Facey M, Chin JK, Gangadharan SK. Marked elevation of alpha fetoprotein caused by hepatoid adenocarcinoma of stomach: A case report. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(10): 123542 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.123542]
|
