|
1
|
-
"We appreciate the efforts of the editorial team and peer reviewers throughout the publication process. The peer-review process was professional and constructive, and the reviewers' comments were helpful in improving the quality and clarity of our manuscript. We are satisfied with the overall editorial and publication experience, including the preparation of the final published article."
-
Liu A, Li M, You Y, Gao L, Xu XS, Li Y, Liu J, Li Y, Zhang ZD, Yang L. Preoperative dual-energy computed tomography radiomics for prognosis of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(11): 123321 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.123321]
|
|
2
|
-
"I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the editors and reviewers for their valuable time, thoughtful consideration, and constructive comments on my manuscript. Their insightful suggestions and helpful feedback have greatly contributed to improving the quality, clarity, and overall presentation of this work. I truly appreciate their dedication, expertise, and careful evaluation throughout the review process."
-
Tanisawa Y, Fujino S, Kimura T, Yoneda N, Nagae A, Sawada G, Moon JH, Fukunaga H, Morimoto O, Morita S. Quantifying abdominal abscess burden using area under the curve methods inspired by dehiscence, infection/inflammation, seroma, hematoma classification. World J Transl Med 2026; 12(4): 125063 [DOI: 10.5528/wjtm.125063]
|
|
3
|
-
"The association between angiosome-targeted revascularization and wound healing or limb salvage compared with non-targeted revascularization is an important topic for the WJD readership. We thank the editor and reviewers for their contributions to improving the manuscript and for publishing it in a high-impact journal. The publication process was smooth and met our expectations."
-
Zoghoul S, Obeidat M, Abdallah E, Al-Hashemi A, Shalaby R, Al-Hashimi I, El-Menyar A, Al-Thani H, Omar A, Barah A. Angiosome-targeted vs non-targeted endovascular revascularization in diabetic foot ischemia: A retrospective cohort study. World J Diabetes 2026; 17(11): 124667 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.124667]
|
|
4
|
-
"Three points are raised in this review. First, it is recommended that the figures be modified as little as possible, and that the original images be kept largely unchanged. Second, the number of reviewers should be increased, so that more reviewers are involved in evaluating the manuscript. Third, the publication fee (page charge) is too high."
-
Du QC, Bai Y, Zhou DH, Yu H, Nian H. Fatty acid desaturase 1 drives esophageal cancer via M1 macrophage ferroptosis and lipid metabolism remodeling. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(11): 124110 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.124110]
|
|
5
|
-
"Editorial Team,
Thank you for giving authors the opportunity to provide feedback\. I would like to offer some comments based not only on my experience with this particular manuscript, but also on my broader experience as an academic author\.
I have been involved in clinical research and scientific publishing for approximately 20 years and, to date, have authored 287 publications indexed in PubMed\. I have also published 87 manuscripts through the F6Publishing/BPG platform\. I therefore have considerable experience both with scientific publishing in general and with your editorial system specifically\.
Over the past few years, and particularly more recently, I have found the BPG manuscript submission, processing, and revision pathway increasingly complex and time\-consuming\. I believe it has now reached a level at which the administrative burden risks becoming a significant deterrent to experienced authors and clinical researchers\.
In a conventional editorial workflow, the process is relatively straightforward: manuscript submission, technical and editorial checks, peer review, editorial decision, author revision and rebuttal, possible reassessment by reviewers, and a final editorial decision\. Scientific rigor does not necessarily require procedural complexity\.
In contrast, the current BPG workflow appears to contain as many as 26 separate processing stages before publication, including multiple editorial\-office decisions, revision checks, repeated processing steps, and additional assessments\. From an author’s perspective, many of these stages appear redundant and substantially increase the time required to manage a manuscript without an obvious corresponding improvement in scientific quality\.
This became particularly evident with our recently published paper\. We underwent four rounds of rebuttal and produced more than 30 pages of responses and explanations\. In practical terms, my co\-authors and I spent more time managing the revision and rebuttal process than we spent writing the manuscript itself\.
I am also concerned about the increasingly prominent role of automated AI\-based manuscript assessments\. Authors are screened for AI\-generated content, yet during the revision process they may also receive extensive AI\-generated Manuscript Quality Assessment Reports in addition to reviewers’ comments and editorial comments\. In our experience, these reports can extend to approximately 20 pages\.
There is an additional issue that deserves clarification\. If an unpublished manuscript is submitted by the publisher to external or proprietary AI systems, authors should be clearly informed about which system is being used, whether manuscript content is retained, whether it can be incorporated into training or other datasets, and whether such processing could subsequently affect similarity or AI\-detection assessments, including iThenticate results\. For unpublished scientific work, transparency regarding confidentiality and data handling is essential\.
The paradox is difficult to overlook: authors are being scrutinized closely for their use of AI while increasingly extensive AI\-generated assessments are being incorporated into the publisher’s own editorial workflow\. AI can undoubtedly assist editorial processes, but it should reduce the workload for authors and editors rather than create an additional layer of mandatory responses on top of conventional peer review\.
This experience has led my research group to reconsider future invitations from BPG journals\. This is unfortunate because I have had a long publishing relationship with the group, as demonstrated by my 87 previous publications through F6Publishing\.
I would therefore strongly encourage the President and senior management of BPG to critically reassess the entire manuscript pathway, particularly the number of processing stages and the role of AI\-generated assessments\. The objective should be to streamline the system while preserving rigorous peer review, editorial oversight, research integrity, and publication quality\.
Clinical researchers are frequently practicing physicians\. Time spent navigating unnecessary administrative complexity is time taken away from patients, research, teaching, and the production of new scientific work\. A rigorous editorial system should therefore also be efficient and proportionate\.
My PhD mentor taught me a principle that has remained with me throughout my academic career: write as though you had to pay for every word you use\. I believe the same principle could usefully be applied to editorial workflows—every additional requirement, report, and processing step should have a clear purpose and add demonstrable value\.
Reducing unnecessary complexity would not lower scientific standards\. On the contrary, I believe it would result in a more focused, professional, author\-friendly, and scientifically rigorous publication process\.
I offer these comments constructively, as a long\-standing author who has published extensively with BPG and who would genuinely like to see the system improve\.
Kind regards,
Marco Zeppieri, MD, PhD"
-
Cappellani F, Capobianco M, Vicari AM, Zeppieri M. PRDX2 and Müller cells in diabetic retinopathy. World J Diabetes 2026; 17(11): 124773 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.124773]
|
|
6
|
-
"The Editor,
Thank you so much for your hard work on our manuscript. Our thanks are extended to the reviewers who did the best to produce the manuscript to be more informative and helpful to the audience of the journal. We appreciate the people who are working in the WJTM. Best wishes"
-
Al-Nimer M, Ibraheem F. Neuropsychiatric effects and safety of Salvia species: A critical narrative review of preclinical and clinical evidence. World J Transl Med 2026; 12(4): 127008 [DOI: 10.5528/wjtm.127008]
|
|
7
|
-
"We sincerely thank the editors and reviewers of World Journal of Diabetes for their valuable comments and professional support throughout the review and publication process. The reviewers' constructive suggestions helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. We also appreciate the editorial team's timely communication, efficient handling of revisions, and professional assistance. We are grateful for the opportunity to publish our research in this journal."
-
Sun Y, Li Q, Wang H, Gu MH, Teng PK, Zhang XY, Han XD, Liu XD. Association of serum oncostatin M with disease severity and mortality in community-acquired pneumonia with diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes 2026; 17(11): 124628 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.124628]
|
|
8
|
-
"We sincerely thank the editorial team and the reviewers for their rigorous, constructive, and patient review of our manuscript. Their insightful comments, particularly on the ensemble voting logic, class imbalance, random cropping, figure legends, and the completeness of Figures, greatly improved the scientific rigor, transparency, and presentation of this work. We are especially grateful to the editors for their meticulous proofreading and timely guidance throughout the revision and publication process. This article would not have reached its final form without their professionalism and dedication. We deeply appreciate the opportunity to publish in World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology and thank the journal for its support."
-
Dong WH, Ling X, Chen XD, Qian JP, Jin Y, Gu YJ. Establishment and validation of a multimodal model using deep learning for the recognition of early colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(11): 123187 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.123187]
|
|
9
|
-
"This journal has rigorous review, efficient response, high-quality review comments, and strong targeting; The editors of the journal communicate promptly and provide professional and impartial feedback. The journal's acceptance and publication are transparent, with a good reputation and a good presentation of clinical research results. It is worth recommending peer submissions."
-
Xu J, Li SX. Exploring the role of the systemic immune-inflammation index in colorectal cancer: A study on screening and prognostic assessment. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(11): 122505 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.122505]
|
|
10
|
-
"Overall, I am very satisfied with the peer review and publication process. The reviewers’ comments were constructive, fair, and helpful in improving the quality and clarity of the manuscript. The editorial process was handled efficiently and professionally, and communication with the journal was clear throughout the different stages of the submission and publication process."
-
Donate-Correa J. Iron, inflammation, and fibroblast growth factor 23: Integrating molecular crosstalk, cardiovascular biology, and therapeutic perspectives. World J Transl Med 2026; 12(4): 127250 [DOI: 10.5528/wjtm.127250]
|
|
11
|
-
"The peer-review process was conducted objectively and efficiently, with constructive comments that helped improve the quality of the manuscript. Editorial communication was clear and timely, and responses to queries were prompt. The editing and production services were professional, well organized, and completed within a reasonable timeframe, contributing to a smooth publication process."
-
Bouayad A. Dynamic programmed death-ligand 1 and multimodal biomarkers in gastric cancer immunotherapy. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(11): 120353 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.120353]
|
|
12
|
-
"The peer-review process was constructive and thorough. The reviewers’ comments were insightful and helped us clarify our findings and improve the overall quality of our manuscript. The editorial office handled the manuscript promptly and professionally, and communication throughout the process was clear and efficient. The final published version, including figures and tables, was well prepared. We sincerely appreciate the support of the editors, reviewers, and editorial staff of World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology"
-
Shonaka T, Tani C, Mizukami S, Koro D, Iwata H, Ohara M, Tanabe H, Makita Y, Tanino M, Yokoo H. Clinical and molecular heterogeneity of microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer in older adults. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(11): 123709 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.123709]
|
|
13
|
-
"We are grateful to the reviewers for their rigorous and constructive feedback，The comments from the peer review experts were objective and positive, especially the association between RHBDF2 gene mutations and disease development,which benefited us a lot.It provides novel ideas for our next stage of research.We will continue to improve our research in future work."
-
Zhang YJ, Wen W, Li F, Yuan J, Zou DH, Shi HP, Liang C, Yang Y. Proportion of esophageal keratinized area ≥ 30% reduces accuracy of preoperative endoscopic evaluation in early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(11): 121634 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.121634]
|
|
14
|
-
"The peer review process was professional, constructive, and well organized. The reviewers provided valuable comments and suggestions that helped us improve the scientific quality, clarity, and presentation of our manuscript. The editorial team was responsive and supportive throughout the review and publication process. We appreciate the time and effort devoted by the editors and reviewers and are grateful for their contributions to our work."
-
Wang N, Tan YW, Zhang PF, Zhou XB, Zhu L. CLIF-AKI score predicts KDIGO stage 3 acute kidney injury in intensive care unit patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(48): 122612 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.122612]
|
|
15
|
-
"I sincerely thank the Editor, editorial team, and reviewers for their valuable time, constructive feedback, and professional support throughout the submission, peer review, and publication process.
I am highly satisfied with the journal's online submission system, the quality and fairness of the peer review process, editorial communication, manuscript handling, and overall publication experience. The reviewers' comments were constructive and helpful in improving the scientific quality and presentation of the manuscript.
I also appreciate the efficiency of the editorial and production teams, the quality of the final published article, and the journal's adherence to academic and publishing standards.
Overall, my experience with the journal has been very positive. I appreciate the professionalism and dedication of the entire editorial team and look forward to future opportunities to contribute to the journal."
-
Modgil V, Nagar N. Sudden death due to acute variceal bleeding: A review of diagnostic challenges and clinical presentation. World J Transl Med 2026; 12(4): 128231 [DOI: 10.5528/wjtm.128231]
|
|
16
|
-
"The journal maintains high standards of academic rigor and credibility. The peer review and editorial processes are transparent and professional. The open access policy and the prompt online publication of the manuscript are highly commendable. The DOI and citation information are clear, which greatly facilitates academic dissemination and sharing. I highly recommend this journal to other researchers in the field."
-
Huang X, Liu WCN, Li DX. Angelica sinensis polysaccharide attenuates constipation-associated colorectal carcinogenesis by inhibiting the NLRP3/Caspase-1/IL-1β inflammasome axis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(11): 121010 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.121010]
|
|
17
|
-
"Our manuscript has just been published online in World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, and I'd like to share a few words about the experience. From submission to online publication, the whole process moved along smoothly. The assistant editor, the handling editor, the reviewers, the editorial director, the editor-in-chief, the language editor and the production editor all did their part, and responses were quick whenever we had questions. The peer-review comments were specific and constructive, and they genuinely helped us sharpen the study design and tighten the writing. The language and production edits also made the final paper much cleaner and easier to read. I also appreciate that the journal is open access, so colleagues in the field can read the paper without barriers, which matters for a topic like ours. The post-publication channels—article quality tracking, reader comments, and the Letter to the Editor option—are a nice touch too, since they keep the conversation going after publication. Overall, the review was rigorous, the process was transparent, and the service was professional. I'd be glad to recommend the journal to colleagues and to work with it again."
-
Wang MF, Chen R, Li J, Cun ZK, Li Q, Jiang HC, Li JW. Genotype-phenotype landscape of Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide deficiency in Yunnan Province, China: A five-year retrospective, multi-ethnic cohort study. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(11): 123971 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.123971]
|
|
18
|
-
"I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the editorial team and the reviewers for their professional and efficient handling of our manuscript. The review process was thorough and constructive: the reviewers' comments were insightful and specific, and they helped us substantially improve the clarity, rigor, and clinical relevance of our work. The editorial staff were responsive and courteous at every stage, from submission through language editing to final production, which made the whole process smooth and reassuring for the authors. I also appreciate the opportunity to respond to the reviewers' suggestions in detail. This was a very positive publishing experience, and I would gladly consider this journal for our future work. Thank you again for your time, expertise, and dedication."
-
Chen B, Chen F, Sun LT, Zhou XL, Guo KB. Beyond a synthetic lethal pair: The atorvastatin-gefitinib combination as a testable model for cross-pillar therapy in colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(11): 120407 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.120407]
|
|
19
|
-
"We would like to express our deepest gratitude to the Editor-in-Chief, the dedicated editorial team, and the anonymous reviewers for their time, exceptional professionalism, and rigorous evaluation throughout the publication process. The constructive feedback provided during peer review significantly enhanced the clarity, scientific rigor, and overall quality of our manuscript. Furthermore, the assistant editors and production team demonstrated outstanding efficiency and clear communication during the proofreading and online hosting stages. We are truly honored to publish our research in this prestigious journal and look forward to submitting our future work to your esteemed platform."
-
Hu R, Zhang HC, Zhang XF. Perineural invasion in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Molecular mechanisms and clinical significance. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(11): 124427 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.124427]
|
|
20
|
-
"We are satisfied with the overall peer review and publication process. The reviewers provided useful comments that helped us improve the manuscript, particularly in the presentation and interpretation of our results. The editorial team was professional and responsive throughout the process. We appreciate the time and effort of the editors and reviewers in handling our manuscript."
-
Han S, Feng ZW, Ran Y, Ma GP, Zhou YC, Lv JZ, Li XB, Wang CH, Wang LZ, Hu SP. Ferroptosis-mitochondria-related molecular subtypes and prognostic signature reveal immune and pathway heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(11): 124061 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.124061]
|
|
21
|
-
"This magazine is easy to submit articles, and the submission format requires humanization. The reviewers and editors are rigorous and professional. It is a magazine with excellent potential, and we fully believe that it can effectively convey clinical and basic research work in general surgery, making important contributions to the development and construction of the discipline. In the future, our team will continue to submit good research to this journal, hoping to share them with more colleagues."
-
Li B, Wei XZ, Song JL, Lv T, Yang J, Ma YK, Zhao JC, Jiang M, Yang JY, Huang B. Arterial vs venous conduits for hepatic artery bypass in pediatric living donor liver transplantation: A retrospective study. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(48): 121888 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.121888]
|
|
22
|
-
"Thank you for the opportunity to publish with the journal. The peer review and editorial process was very streamlined and everyone working with the journal was easy to contact. In the future, I would absolutely consider submitting additional manuscripts. I would encourage current manuscript writers and researchers to consider publishing with this group."
-
Sarver J, Shanholtzer A, Palka J. Review of difficult foley catheterization: Why the use of Coudé catheters are not standard nursing protocol. World J Transl Med 2026; 12(4): 127178 [DOI: 10.5528/wjtm.127178]
|
|
23
|
-
"Dear Editor,
Thank you so much for the extra effort that was done by the editorial team and reviewers. The reviewers did the best by highlighting the important and scientific comments. It is our pleasure to continue with WJTM with more original articles and meta-analysis studies. Once again I appreciate your hard work. Best wishes.
Dr. Marwan A-Nimer and Dr. Faten Ibraheem"
-
Al-Nimer MS. Letter to the Editor: Improving the reliability of functional capacity testing in liver cirrhosis: A novel assessment direction. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(7): 116562 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.116562]
|
|
24
|
-
"We would like to express our sincere appreciation for the peer review process at the World Journal of Translational Medicine. The reviewers provided thorough, constructive and highly professional comments that substantially improved the clarity, scientific rigor and translational relevance of our manuscript. The editorial handling was timely, transparent and fair, with clear communication at every stage. The suggestions regarding methodology, interpretation of data and recent literature were particularly valuable. Overall, the process was rigorous yet supportive, and it significantly enhanced the quality of the final article. We would gladly submit future work to the journal."
-
Tarara V, Panteris E, Varlamis S, Andreadou E, Pessach I, Bobos M, Chatzidimitriou M, Mitka S, Papoutsi A, Eleftheriou P, Skepastianos P, Karamitrousis E. Prognostic biomarkers for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A contemporary systematic review and modelling study. World J Transl Med 2026; 12(4): 126295 [DOI: 10.5528/wjtm.126295]
|
|
25
|
-
"The manuscript underwent external, single-blind peer review followed by a focused revision that preserved its original scope and central conclusions. The reviewers’ comments were relevant and proportionate to the nature of a minireview, leading mainly to clarification, evidence calibration, and improvements in organization and readability rather than major restructuring. The revision more clearly distinguishes the relatively consistent dosimetric benefits for the ipsilateral lung and liver from the uncertain effects on the heart, right coronary artery, and contralateral breast, while refining the discussion of RPM, OSMS, ABC, patient selection, breathing training, and per-fraction quality assurance. After acceptance on October 9, 2026, the article was made available online on November 4, 2026. Overall, the editorial and peer-review process was orderly and timely, strengthening the accuracy, balance, and clinical usefulness of the article while preserving the authors’ scientific interpretation."
-
Chen WY, Gan ZY, Cai YW, Hua ZQ, Yi L. Advances in deep inspiration breath-hold technique for radiotherapy of right-sided breast cancer. World J Transl Med 2026; 12(4): 126251 [DOI: 10.5528/wjtm.126251]
|
|
26
|
-
"The authors express their satisfaction with the peer review as well as the manuscript editing and publishing process of the journal. The reviewers provided rigorous, insightful and constructive suggestions which substantially enhanced the scientific quality and presentation of this manuscript. The editorial team communicated promptly at each stage, and the whole administrative and production procedure was orderly, transparent and efficient."
-
Xue HY, Ren TY, Pan Q, Fan JG. Organoids as preclinical platforms for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: Model construction, mechanistic dissection, and therapeutic translation. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(48): 123934 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.123934]
|
|
27
|
-
"It was a smooth publication process. I am glad to support this journal because I am on the editorial board. The peer review report was relevant and helped me improve my manuscript. The editor assigned was vigilant and quite meticulous and helpful. All in all it was a pleasant experience and I would be glad to contribute again on another occasion."
-
Issa IA, Issa T. Role of artificial intelligence in irritable bowel syndrome: A narrative review. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2026; 7(3): 127488 [DOI: 10.35712/aig.127488]
|
|
28
|
-
"The waiting time from receiving an article to its final publication is too long. Even after paying the APC, it takes a long time to see any progress. I hope for improvements.
I hope the process can be improved, or that the publication cycle for group short articles can be adjusted through the pre proof after APC conformation.
Other aspects are satisfactory. I hope the journal will continue to improve，and gain increasing influence."
-
Danzeng SL, Chen YH, Zha X, Wang Q. Two-stage complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography comprising early retroperitoneal perforation and delayed biliary stent migration: A case report. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(48): 123215 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.123215]
|
|
29
|
-
"The submission and editorial process for our systematic review and meta-analysis (Manuscript ID 08553133; DOI 10.35712/aig.125015) was well organized and transparent. Title submission and acceptance were prompt (15 and 25 March 2026), and the editorial office granted a two-week extension to allow completion of the statistical analyses, for which we are grateful. Peer review was constructive and helped strengthen the methodological reporting, particularly regarding the risk-of-bias assessment and heterogeneity analyses. The production team handled the language editing and figure/table preparation professionally. We appreciate the journal's open-access model and the waiver of article processing charges for 2026–2028, which is valuable for authors in resource-limited settings. We would welcome continued improvements in clarity of the revision checklist."
-
Omullo FP, Kitheghe TK, Sheikh IA, Gakuya AM, Gitumu JM, Shiekh MA, Agai WO, Orenge WB, Gogo HM. Predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer via artificial intelligence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2026; 7(3): 125015 [DOI: 10.35712/aig.125015]
|
|
30
|
-
"My overall experience with the journal was very good. I am satisfied with the submission system, peer review, editorial support, and the presentation of the published article. I appreciate the time and effort devoted to reviewing, editing, and publishing my manuscript. Thank you to everyone involved in the publication process. I am happy for this evaluation and my comments to be made publicly available alongside my article."
-
Salman A. Artificial intelligence in autoimmune liver diseases: Diagnosis, risk stratification, and personalized care. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(10): 124997 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.124997]
|
|
31
|
-
"My overall experience with the journal was very good. I am satisfied with the submission system, peer review, editorial support, and the presentation of the published article. I appreciate the time and effort devoted to reviewing, editing, and publishing my manuscript. Thank you to everyone involved in the publication process. I am happy for this evaluation and my comments to be made publicly available alongside my article."
-
Salman A, Elewa A, Marwan A. Artificial intelligence in autoimmune pancreatitis: Differentiating immunoglobulin G4-related pancreatitis from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2026; 7(3): 123890 [DOI: 10.35712/aig.123890]
|
|
32
|
-
"I am quite satisfied with the overall experience of this submission and publication. The reviewers' opinions were constructive and significantly contributed to improving the quality of the manuscript; the editorial team provided professional guidance and timely communication throughout the process. The publication process was well-organized, the layout was clear, and the online full text presentation was excellent. I would like to express my gratitude to the editorial and production teams for their efforts, which helped our work be successfully published."
-
Lin BQ, Ye SF, Zou SM, Wang LL, Tang LM, Huang CM, Luo CL, Huang WK, Deng WW, Lai DQ, Li XL, Qiu T, Qiu HZ, Zeng ME. Prevalence, familial clustering, and influencing factors of Helicobacter pylori infection in Western Fujian Province households. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(48): 122494 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.122494]
|
|
33
|
-
"We sincerely thank the editors and reviewers of the World Journal of Gastroenterology for their careful evaluation and valuable suggestions. Publication of this work provides useful evidence for clinicians and researchers in the field. We hope our findings stimulate further studies and improve patient management. We are grateful for this opportunity."
-
Shi JL, Muhammad T, He TT, Lin ZY, Zhang TG, Liu SY, Yang XL, Yang Y, Hu L, Ran P, Numan M, Li J. Establishment of a Sprague-Dawley rat model of hepatolithiasis based on common bile duct catheterization. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(48): 122778 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.122778]
|
|
34
|
-
"We had a very good publishing experience with World Journal of Gastroenterology. The editorial team responded to our inquiries promptly throughout the whole process. The peer reviewers put forward rigorous, professional and constructive suggestions, which effectively helped us polish our manuscript and strengthen our argument. We fully recognize the academic credibility of this journal and sincerely thank all editors and reviewers for their devoted work."
-
Liu SQ, Li SQ, Sun YM, Li YF. Combined magnetic recanalization and laparoscopic antireflux surgery for complex esophageal comorbidities in an infant with congenital esophageal atresia. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(48): 123390 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.123390]
|
|
35
|
-
"The overall publication experience was satisfactory and professionally managed. The online submission system was user-friendly, and the editorial and peer-review processes were systematic and constructive. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the scientific quality and clarity of the manuscript. The editorial team was responsive and supportive throughout the publication process. The article editing, formatting, figures, tables, and final published version were satisfactory. I appreciate the journal's efforts in maintaining publication standards and facilitating the dissemination of scientific research. I wish the journal continued success."
-
Kashiv P, Balwani MR, Saxena K, Tolani P, Pasari A, Kute VB. Artificial intelligence-driven risk estimation, early detection, diagnostic characterisation and prognosis in hepatitis b-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2026; 7(3): 124278 [DOI: 10.35712/aig.124278]
|
|
36
|
-
"I would like to express my sincere appreciation to the Editorial Office, the editors, and the peer reviewers of Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology for their professionalism, constructive feedback, and excellent collaboration throughout the publication process.
The reviewers’ thoughtful comments and the editors’ careful guidance contributed significantly to improving the clarity, scientific rigor, and overall quality of the manuscript. The entire editorial process was characterized by effective communication, academic integrity, mutual respect, and a genuine commitment to maintaining high publication standards.
It has been a truly positive and rewarding experience, and I sincerely appreciate the dedication and support of everyone involved."
-
Kapritsou M. Nursing leadership and performance metrics in artificial intelligence integrated gastrointestinal surgical care: A narrative review. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2026; 7(3): 125126 [DOI: 10.35712/aig.125126]
|
|
37
|
-
""We are extremely pleased with the overall handling and publication workflow of our manuscript. The peer-review process was conducted with remarkable speed and academic rigor, allowing us to enhance the quality of our work effectively. Furthermore, the editorial team provided clear, constructive communication and seamless support throughout the open-access production stages. Given this highly positive and efficient experience, we sincerely look forward to submitting our future research papers to your esteemed journal.""
-
Malakar S, Sood N, Giri S, Samanta A. Nor-ursodeoxycholic acid in hepatobiliary diseases: A narrative review. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2026; 17(3): 120122 [PMID: 42707862 DOI: 10.4292/wjgpt.120122]
|
|
38
|
-
""We are pleased with the overall handling of our manuscript. The peer-review process was conducted with remarkable speed and clarity, allowing us to enhance the quality of our work effectively. Furthermore, the editorial team provided clear, constructive communication and seamless support throughout the open-access production stages. Given this highly positive and efficient experience, we sincerely look forward to submitting our future research papers to your esteemed journal.""
-
Paul RS, Samanta A. Gut-ocular axis: An emerging strategy to treat ocular diseases. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(25): 124172 [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.124172]
|
|
39
|
-
"We are really happy about the overall handling and publication of our manuscript. The peer-review process was conducted with amazing speed and in detail, allowing us to enhance the quality of our work. The editorial team provided clear, constructive communication and good support throughout the open-access production stages. Given this highly positive and efficient experience, we sincerely look forward to submitting our future research papers to your esteemed journal.""
-
Roy SK, Samanta A, Banerjee A. Artificial intelligence in gastroenterology practice: Current perspectives and emerging prospects. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2026; 7(3): 125000 [DOI: 10.35712/aig.125000]
|
|
40
|
-
"Thanks to the Editor, all Reviewers and and Co workers of the journal site for the job well done. All of our authors appreciate your precious work for the literature. We hope world journal all the best.
Sincerely yours
Odul Egritas Gurkan M.D. Professor
Gazi University School of Medicine Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology Ankara, Türkiye"
-
Kotlarz D, Egritas Gurkan O, Haskologlu ZS, Ekinci O, Aksu Unlusoy A, Gürcan Kaya N, Puchalka J, Klein C, Dalgic B. Differential diagnosis in ulcerative colitis in an adolescent: Chronic granulomatous disease needs extra attention. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2017; 8(2): 87-92 [PMID: 28573071 DOI: 10.4291/wjgp.v8.i2.87]
|
|
41
|
-
"We are extremely pleased with the overall handling and publication workflow of our manuscript. The peer-review process was conducted with remarkable speed and academic rigor, allowing us to enhance the quality of our work effectively. Furthermore, the editorial team provided clear, constructive communication and seamless support throughout the open-access production stages. Given this highly positive and efficient experience, we sincerely look forward to submitting our future research papers to your esteemed journal."
-
Kudu E, Hizli N, Danış F, Altun M. Defensive medicine and advanced imaging overuse in emergency departments: A focused review of imaging stewardship and overcrowding. World J Radiol 2026; 18(10): 127912 [PMID: 42964695 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.127912]
|
|
42
|
-
"I overall had a positive experience with the peer review and editorial processes of World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. The reviewers provided constructive and fair feedback, and the editorial team was efficient.
I sincerely hope that the journal's indexing status on PubMed/MEDLINE will be fully restored soon, as this will further enhance the visibility and reach of published research."
-
Cavallaro A. Diabetes mellitus, glycemic control, and risk of postoperative infectious complications in gastric and colorectal cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(10): 120959 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i10.120959]
|
|
43
|
-
"Your journal has a clear academic positioning, a rigorous and professional peer-review process, and efficient, friendly editorial communication. The publication experience is positive, and the overall quality is high. It is trustworthy and worth recommending to peers for submission. I would gladly submit to this journal again in the future."
-
Li XP, Zhang J, Liu Q, Wu YQ, Yang WY, Li JX, Liu XH, Sun YF, Zhou HL, Zhou ZH, Dai ZZ, Wang XY. Neural correlates of aggressive impulsive behavior differ between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: An event-related potential study with a go/no-go task. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(11): 123531 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.123531]
|
|
44
|
-
"I am very satisfied with the peer review system. I am also very satisfied with the editor's comments, which have been of great help to me and are very fair and objective. I hope that in the future, the review process can be faster and the publication cycle can be shortened."
-
Wang WJ, Miao WW, Li XJ, Yang MX, Niu JX, Han YM, Xing YR. Association between mindfulness and sleep quality in perimenopausal women: A cross-sectional mediation analysis of depressive symptoms. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(11): 122935 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.122935]
|
|
45
|
-
"We highly appreciate the rigorous peer-review system and efficient editorial management of this journal. The whole publication process is well-organized, and we are deeply satisfied with the patient and professional guidance provided by the editorial office throughout our submission journey. Every communication was responded to in a timely manner, and the standardized review procedures greatly helped us improve the quality of our manuscript. We sincerely recognize the dedication of all editors and reviewers and look forward to submitting our future research work to this reputable journal."
-
Chen YF, Zhu Y, Li BX, Zhang JN. Impact of multicomponent, nonpharmacological care program for mild Alzheimer’s disease with anxiety and depression. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(11): 123323 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.123323]
|
|
46
|
-
"We are writing to express our sincere gratitude for the publication of our article. Thank you for your careful review, constructive comments, and efficient handling throughout the entire process. Your professionalism and support have been invaluable in improving the quality of our work. We deeply appreciate the time and effort you and the reviewers have devoted to our manuscript. We look forward to future cooperation and wish your journal continued success."
-
Yasen A, Gan ZD, Huang MP, Zhang XY, Hou RT, Zhen D, Xu GX, Wei CH. Research trends of ferroptosis and pyroptosis in depression: A bibliometric analysis. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(11): 124306 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.124306]
|
|
47
|
-
"We are very satisfied with our experience with the World Journal of Gastroenterology. We sincerely thank the editors and the entire editorial and production team for their professionalism, careful attention, and support throughout the publication process. We are also deeply grateful to the peer reviewers for their thoughtful, constructive, and insightful comments, which helped us improve the clarity and quality of our manuscript. We greatly appreciate the time and effort invested by everyone involved."
-
Du YY, Liu YM, Fang RY, Zheng HG. Inflammation-lipid metabolism biomarker-based machine learning models for predicting postoperative pulmonary metastasis in colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(46): 121708 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.121708]
|
|
48
|
-
"Instructions for authors are not clear and far too complex, redacted in a file rather than being based on a Word template with designated styles for each section of the paper being submitted. The process of prepairing the figures is too complicated, even for simple imaging samples, let alone for complex blot-reports and combined microscopic imaging. Responding to 3 reviews and to the editor is too complicated and time consuming, please adopt a simpler way of comment call-outs in Word on a sigle file that contains all revisions asked. Also, the use of AI-generated reviews by the editor raises some questions since the reviewers are specifically asked not to use generative-AI tools in their reviews."
-
Stuparu Adam AM, Osama A, Stere A, Cochior D, Pogărăşteanu ME, Moldovan CA, Tudorache IS, Adam R, Moldovan AD. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography-guided percutaneous bone biopsy in musculoskeletal oncology: A single-center cohort study. World J Radiol 2026; 18(10): 125901 [PMID: 42964659 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.125901]
|
|
49
|
-
"This journal is trustworthy with transparent publication procedures. The peer review process was fair and rigorous, and the reviewers offered constructive comments that greatly improved my manuscript. The entire publication process was smooth and efficient, and the editorial team was professional and responsive. I am satisfied with the service and would recommend this journal to my colleagues."
-
Wang Q, Wang MD. Job vs leisure: Rethinking physical activity as a precision strategy for mental and cognitive aging in China. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(11): 117569 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.117569]
|
|
50
|
-
"I appreciate the thoroughly peer review process and incredible communication during the period of review. Also, I commend the effort put in typing the equations in the appropriate format.This manuscript is an original research but it is classified as minireview because the journal does not have original research as a manuscript type; I suggest that original research opition should be included."
-
Chika CE. Generalized multi-energy model for computing radiation treatment parameters on image domain and automated model-selection framework. World J Radiol 2026; 18(10): 126287 [PMID: 42964685 DOI: 10.4329/wjr.126287]
|
