|
1
|
-
"We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the editorial office, the peer reviewers, and the production team for their professional and efficient work throughout the entire publication process. The reviewers provided insightful and constructive comments that significantly improved the quality of our manuscript. The editorial handling was timely, and all communications were clear and well-organized. Overall, we had a very positive experience with World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery and would highly recommend it to colleagues in the field."
-
Xu K, Zhou DH, Feng J, Liu JS. Laparoscopic choledocholithotomy for gallbladder and common bile duct stones: Outcomes of primary closure vs T-tube drainage. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(7): 120916 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.120916]
|
|
2
|
-
"Good experience as always. This manuscript took a bit more time to get published, more than the usual amount. However, it was still quite acceptable compared to other journals. In general I have no negative comments. The subject was not part of my expertise so i had to do some research to complete the manuscript which was a welcome change."
-
Issa T, Issa I. Ethnic divergence in human leukocyte antigen-linked immunogenicity in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(25): 115526 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.115526]
|
|
3
|
-
"Good experience as usual. Fair and objective assessment. Reviewers may be using AI but this is quite helpful if done properly and in the right context. The subject matter was quite nice and challenging which made the contribution even more interesting. Always glad to participate in any form with this journal."
-
Issa IA, Issa T. Advancing bowel preparation: DWJ1609 represents a patient-centered evolution in colonoscopy preparation. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(30): 118991 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.118991]
|
|
4
|
-
"We were very satisfied with our experience working with the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. The peer-review process was rigorous, thorough, and constructive, and the comments from the editors and reviewers substantially improved the scientific quality and presentation of our manuscript. Although the process took somewhat longer than expected, the careful and transparent editorial handling gave us confidence in the integrity and final quality of our published article. We sincerely thank the publisher, the editorial team, and the reviewers for their professionalism, dedication, and valuable contributions."
-
Le KL, Dinh TT, Thai KP, Pham TN, Tran MQ, Pham PC, Trinh MT, Duong NNQ, Nguyen TK, Le NK, Mai-Phan TA. Bleeding and vascular complications after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage: Incidence and associated factors in a Vietnamese tertiary center. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(7): 120929 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.120929]
|
|
5
|
-
"Your journal features expedited initial screening, timely revision suggestions, and responsive, courteous editorial handling. The articles are professionally typeset with high production standards. Coupled with moderate publication charges, these attributes attest to the journal's reliability and make it particularly attractive to scholars who face both budget constraints and time pressures."
-
Shi L, Zhang ZQ, Cheng Y, Qi SQ, Zhang T, Shen WC, Hu XY, Zhou YL, Ju JJ. Pelvic floor physical therapy combined with biofeedback electrical stimulation for postoperative fecal incontinence in children with Hirschsprung’s disease. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(7): 118843 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v18.i7.118843]
|
|
6
|
-
"I am very pleased with the entire publication process for our manuscript. The editorial team was highly responsible and efficient, providing clear guidance at each step. The peer review process was rigorous and constructive; the reviewers' insightful comments and suggestions significantly improved the quality and clarity of our work. We also appreciated the relatively fast publication timeline, which allowed our findings to be disseminated in a timely manner. Overall, it was a positive and professional experience. Thank you for your excellent work."
-
Zhou CM, Bao CY, Ma FF, Li M, Ha XQ. Effects of microenvironmental engineering on the stemness of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(7): 120910 [DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.120910]
|
|
7
|
-
"Our publishing experience of article: Prognostic significance of stem cell markers: in triple-negative breast cancers, in the World Journal of Clinical Oncology was highly innovative and professional. The journal implements a rigorous, standardized, and transparent peer-review system with a well-structured editorial and reviewer team. Editorial team communication throughout the submission was smooth, effective and innovative.The manuscript evaluation maintains high academic standards,recent topics in oncology. Reviewers team is excellent with high quality suggestions for improvement and well constructive changes of article. This journal have a good academic reputation. We thank the reviewers and the editorial team.We would be happy to publish recent update topics with your journal in the future." Sunil V Jagtap."
-
Jagtap SV, Jagtap SS. Prognostic significance of stem cell markers: In triple-negative breast cancers. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(7): 119673 [DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v17.i7.119673]
|
|
8
|
-
"I am pleased with the online full-text formatting arrangements, the journal’s overall publication workflow, specified academic norms and submission standards, academic integrity screening procedures, scheduled publication timeframe, editorial and publishing specifications, the duration of the peer review procedure, as well as the blinded peer review mechanism. The reviewer comments offered valuable guidance to improve my manuscript, and I consider the peer review feedback received for my work impartial and reasonable."
-
Wu Y, Yin WH, Wang HJ, Cai H. miR-140-3p in exosomes derived from bone-marrow mesenchymal stem cells inhibits pyrotoisosis by targeting PTEN under high-glucose condition. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(7): 118557 [DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.118557]
|
|
9
|
-
"Thanks! This professional manuscript submission service has delivered an impressively fast response speed at every key step throughout the entire process, from the initial consultation to the final confirmation of the submission results. The team behind it has provided thoughtful, patient and highly attentive support, carefully addressing every small concern and request we put forward. It has successfully brought us an extremely satisfying, smooth and comfortable user experience that far exceeded all our initial expectations for this kind of professional submission service."
-
Zhang W, Chu WH. Letter to the Editor: Sclerostin knockdown in human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells confers superior therapeutic efficacy against steroid-induced osteonecrosis. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(7): 115076 [DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.115076]
|
|
10
|
-
"The reviewers were quick, concise, and tremendously helpful in transforming our manuscript to address subjects pertinent to the relevant literature in the field. We are thankful for the team assigned to us for peer review. As a result, our manuscript has greater scientific breadth and a more relevant framework for future research."
-
Kunz EM, Carroll JP, Schoeller III RJ, Lucke-Wold B. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in irritable bowel syndrome: Mechanistic and translational insights. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(7): 117946 [DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.117946]
|
|
11
|
-
"We consider that this work brings novel perspectives to early gastric cancer. During the publication process, we appreciate the careful evaluation and constructive suggestions from the editors and reviewers, which greatly helped us improve the quality of this manuscript. We hope the results presented in this paper will attract the interest of peers and promote further discussion in the research community."
-
Chen B, Han H, Zhang XX, Chen JX, Fan X. Research progress in laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery for early gastric cancer: A narrative review. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(30): 119614 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.119614]
|
|
12
|
-
"The review process was truly very supportive. Right from initial submission to final publication, every single step was smooth, clear, and user-friendly. The reviewers provided thoughtful, constructive feedback that significantly enhanced the overall quality of our paper. Throughout every stage, the editorial team was remarkably supportive, prompt, and helpful. It was a wonderful experience from start to finish. The overall review process was more than satisfactory."
-
Balutkar SD, Bhavthankar SS, Nagoba BS. Letter to the Editor: Potential pitfalls in deep learning-based imaging for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. World J Radiol 2026; 18(7): 120076 [DOI: 10.4329/wjr.120076]
|
|
13
|
-
"The review process greatly contributes to the improvement of paper quality through rigorous evaluation and constructive feedback. Reviewers’ insightful comments help authors refine their arguments, clarify data presentation, and strengthen overall logic. Meanwhile, the editorial team demonstrates remarkable professionalism and efficiency, ensuring fair, timely decisions. Their dedication and clear communication create a supportive environment that truly elevates scholarly work."
-
Liang ZY, Hu HS. Letter to the Editor: Extracellular vesicles in diabetic bladder dysfunction - a promising cell-free therapeutic avenue from amniotic fluid stem cells. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(7): 117525 [DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.117525]
|
|
14
|
-
"We thank the reviewers for providing valuable and constructive comments, and we are grateful to the editors for their careful review and professional evaluation of this manuscript. We have comprehensively revised the manuscript by addressing all raised issues. We sincerely appreciate the efforts of the reviewers and editors, which greatly help improve the overall quality of this work."
-
Zhao HJ, Su LH, Lu FH, Gao F, Sai JH, Li P, Shi JL, Wang L, Li SJ, Zhou F, Zhou LM, Wang N, He PY. Computed tomography-based correction of the body mass index improves malnutrition detection in patients with cirrhosis and ascites. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(7): 122692 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.122692]
|
|
15
|
-
"I am very satisfied with the overall publication process. The editorial and production teams were professional, efficient, and responsive throughout the review, revision, and proofing stages. The communication was clear and timely, and all of my questions and corrections were handled carefully. I appreciate the efforts of the editors, reviewers, and production staff in improving the quality of the manuscript and ensuring its successful publication. Thank you for your excellent support."
-
Duan YL, Wen YH, Chen SA, Nie R, Pang MQ, Deng MJ, Wang ZX, Fan HN. Efficacy and safety of cell-based regenerative therapies for fistula-related diseases: An umbrella review of systematic reviews. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(7): 122048 [DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.122048]
|
|
16
|
-
"I would like to sincerely thank the entire editorial team for their professionalism, efficiency, and support throughout the review and publication process. I greatly appreciated the constructive comments from the reviewers, the careful editorial work, and the prompt assistance provided at every stage. It has been a pleasure working with the World Journal of Radiology editorial office, and I look forward to future collaborations."
-
Boraschi P, Cervelli R, Donati F. Common cystic pancreatic neoplasms: A comprehensive magnetic resonance imaging-based review of typical and atypical imaging features. World J Radiol 2026; 18(7): 120526 [DOI: 10.4329/wjr.120526]
|
|
17
|
-
"We are very satisfied with the journal's editorial and peer review process. The reviewers provided fair, constructive, and valuable comments that significantly improved the quality of our manuscript. Communication with the editorial office was prompt, professional, and supportive throughout the publication process. The overall publishing experience was smooth, transparent, efficient, and met our expectations."
-
Khan SA, Jha SK, Tiwari P, Narang J, Gupta V, Singh SK, Anand K, Rajendran RL, Gangadaran P, Parvez S. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles as next generation drug delivery platforms. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(7): 120363 [DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.120363]
|
|
18
|
-
"We appreciate the thoroughness of your editorial team and the timely communication at each stage. The online submission process of WJG is convenient and fast, the publication rules are standardized, and the review cycle is satisfactory. Thank you for your detailed comments and for providing valuable insights throughout the review process. Your constructive feedback has significantly enhanced the quality and clarity of our manuscript.The professionalism and rigor of the publishing process were exemplary, ensuring a smooth and collaborative experience. The peer reviewers are professional, the review report is detailed, and the content of the review report is fair and objective. Article editing and typesetting quality is high. WJG has strong credibility."
-
Gu JJ, Yao M, Yang J, Cai Y, Zheng WJ, Wang L, Yao DB, Yao DF. Mitochondrial carnitine palmitoyl transferase-II inactivity aggravates lipid accumulation in rat hepatocarcinogenesis. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(2): 256-264 [PMID: 28127199 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i2.256]
|
|
19
|
-
"We appreciate the thoroughness of your editorial team and the timely communication at each stage. The online submission process of WJG is convenient and fast, the publication rules are standardized, and the review cycle is satisfactory. Thank you for your detailed comments and for providing valuable insights throughout the review process. Your constructive feedback has significantly enhanced the quality and clarity of our manuscript.The professionalism and rigor of the publishing process were exemplary, ensuring a smooth and collaborative experience. The peer reviewers are professional, the review report is detailed, and the content of the review report is fair and objective. Article editing and typesetting quality is high. WJG has strong credibility."
-
Zhou MY, Fang RF, Tang H, Xia XX, Xie Q, Yao DF, Sai WL, Yao M. Activated cGAS-STING signaling promotes malignancy in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease via mitochondrial DNA and immune cell dysfunction. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(7): 121423 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.121423]
|
|
20
|
-
"I am deeply honored to have our work published in the World Journal of Hepatology. I extend my sincere gratitude to the editorial team and peer reviewers for their invaluable guidance throughout the evaluation process. We hope this contribution advances clinical understanding in this argument. Thank You again to all"
-
Giangregorio F. Prognostic power of dynamic enhancement in advanced chronic liver disease: Moving beyond static liver structure. World J Hepatol 2026; 18(7): 116709 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.116709]
|
|
21
|
-
"The process is alright. It could be improved a bit in terms if timelines for the submission to publication or pubmed indexation etc but overall i am pleased with the process and do not have major criticism. The peer review comments did help to shape the manuscript discussion and organize contents a bit better."
-
Yu JR, Tan THM, Rao AD, Balasubramaniam S, Shelat VG. Metastasis to the adrenal glands: An update. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(7): 122037 [DOI: 10.5306/wjco.122037]
|
|
22
|
-
"I am very satisfied with the overall experience of publishing in World Journal of Radiology. The submission system was user-friendly, the editorial team was responsive and professional, and the peer-review process was rigorous yet fair. The reviewers provided detailed and constructive feedback that significantly improved the quality of my manuscript. Communication was smooth throughout, and the publication timeline was reasonable. I would definitely submit again and highly recommend this journal to fellow researchers."
-
He ZY, Zhan ZW, Zhou LJ, Tang J, Chen C, Yang QJ, Tian Q, Wang XH. Development and validation of a clinical factor-based nomogram for predicting imaging-defined cardiopulmonary abnormality risk in an asymptomatic screening population. World J Radiol 2026; 18(7): 123894 [DOI: 10.4329/wjr.123894]
|
|
23
|
-
"We are satisfied with the editorial and peer-review process. The manuscript handling was professional, the reviewers provided constructive and objective comments that improved the quality of our manuscript, and the editorial office communicated efficiently throughout the publication process. We appreciate the timely handling of our manuscript and the support provided by the editorial team."
-
Phadikar SD, Hyder A, Rajendran RL, Krishnan A, Hong CM, Gangadaran P, Ahn BC. Radiolabeled exosomes for theranostics: Personalized tailored therapy through imaging. World J Radiol 2026; 18(7): 122678 [DOI: 10.4329/wjr.122678]
|
|
24
|
-
"This single-center retrospective analysis identified independent risk factors for MRI overstaging in rectal cancer, including small polypoid tumors and marked tumor regression following neoadjuvant therapy. The study further confirmed that radiologists' experience, specialized training, and participation in multidisciplinary team discussions significantly influence staging accuracy. For high-risk patients predisposed to overdiagnosis, the integration of endorectal ultrasound with multidisciplinary evaluation can optimize preoperative staging and mitigate the risk of excessive overtreatment. Additional multi-center prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings."
-
Zhou DB, Yu J, He SJ, Teng Q, Guo Q, Li QL. Determinants of magnetic resonance imaging overstaging in rectal cancer T-staging. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(7): 121461 [DOI: 10.5306/wjco.121461]
|
|
25
|
-
"We sincerely thank the reviewers and the editorial team for their time, expertise, and thoughtful engagement with our correspondence. Their constructive comments and careful reading of our arguments have helped us sharpen our reasoning, clarify key points, and improve the overall coherence of our letter. We also appreciate the editors' guidance in shaping the final version and ensuring that our message is communicated clearly and concisely. The peer review process has been a valuable opportunity to refine our perspective, and we are grateful for the professionalism and support shown throughout. We hope our revised letter contributes meaningfully to the ongoing scientific discussion."
-
Xu JJ, Ni CX. Letter to the Editor: Beyond cyst size - a time-risk-state framework for dynamic surveillance de-escalation of branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. World J Clin Oncol 2026; 17(7): 123540 [DOI: 10.5306/wjco.123540]
|
|
26
|
-
"We have no further comments regarding the process. The peer review and publication process was straightforward, transparent, and easy to follow. The instructions provided at each stage were clear, and the submission system was user-friendly. The editorial office responded promptly and professionally to any questions or requests for clarification. Overall, the experience was positive, efficient, and well organized."
-
Karadimou K, Mavrovounis G, Karapetsa M, Pantazopoulos I. Aspiration of a metallic-crowned tooth in the left main bronchus in a neurocritical patient: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(21): 120561 [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.120561]
|
|
27
|
-
"We submitted our manuscript (Number 117164) to the World Journal of Gastroenterology for consideration on November 29, 2025. This manuscript went through a helpful, supportive, and thorough peer review process that greatly improved its quality before it was published on July 14, 2026. We appreciate and agree with the journal publishing process."
-
Bouare N, Delwaide J. Fibroscan and fibrosis-4 in recovered hepatitis C patients. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(30): 117164 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.117164]
|
|
28
|
-
"This journal features rigorous academic standards and a good academic reputation. Communication throughout the submission was smooth and the review schedule was reasonable. The journal maintains high academic standards, and the reviewers put forward professional, detailed and constructive suggestions, which effectively helped me polish and improve this study.I am quite satisfied with all the work and sincerely thank every member of the editorial office."
-
Ma LX, Zhang LN, Zhu YZ, Wang MH, Du XB, Qi LJ, Sun J, Yi XL, Wang P, Zhou ZG, Ji XY, Zhang L. Risk of respiratory complications following gastrointestinal endoscopy under monitored anesthesia care: A prospective cohort study. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(30): 122191 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.122191]
|
|
29
|
-
"The manuscript submission system may seem complicated at first glance. However, once you start working with it, everything becomes clear and logically structured. The peer review process was thorough and constructive, the editorial team was professional and responsive, and the final quality of the published article is excellent. I am very satisfied with the entire publication process and grateful for the opportunity to publish in World Journal of Cardiology."
-
Suslov AV, Khasanova ZB, Buchaka AS, Doroschuk AD, Postnov AY. Herpesvirus infection and thoracic aortic aneurysm: Synthesis of evidence and contradictions. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(7): 122814 [DOI: 10.4330/wjc.122814]
|
|
30
|
-
"We sincerely thank the handling editor and reviewers for their rigorous and constructive feedback, which greatly improved our manuscript. Their thoughtful suggestions enhanced both the scientific depth and the clarity of our arguments. We also appreciate the editorial office's professional handling, clear communication, and timely decisions throughout the process. We are fully satisfied with the published paper and genuinely grateful for this positive and encouraging review experience."
-
Zhang WT, Xu M, Zheng Y, Wu J, Zheng YJ, Wei J, Kang T, Jiang J, Cheng Y. Endoscopic diagnosis of non-erosive reflux disease. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(30): 119177 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.119177]
|
|
31
|
-
"My publishing experience with the World Journal of Gastroenterology (WJG) was highly positive and professional. The journal implements a rigorous, standardized, and transparent peer-review system with a well-structured editorial workflow. Each manuscript is evaluated by at least two independent academic reviewers with professional expertise in gastroenterology and related clinical research. The review comments I received were detailed, objective, and highly constructive, which effectively helped us optimize the research framework, refine data interpretation, and substantially improve the academic quality and presentation of our manuscript. The entire submission, review, and publication process was efficient, normative, and worthy of recommendation."
-
Zhang Q, Li J, Meng T, Chen ZF, Zhou XZ, Lu XR. Deep-learning-based object detection of pelvic autonomic nerves during total mesorectal excision. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(30): 121592 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.121592]
|
|
32
|
-
"I was thoroughly impressed by the quality of the journal’s review process. The peer review report was fair—strictly evidence-based and balanced—and at the same time remarkably effective, delivering precise criticisms and constructive recommendations that genuinely improved our work. My experience with the editorial office has been nothing short of exemplary, reinforcing my confidence in the journal’s commitment to integrity, transparency, and scholarly excellence."
-
Liu H, Jiang WY, Mao FF. Letter to the Editor: Advancing the clinical translation of triptolide and quercetin in hepatocellular carcinoma: A commentary on dual JAK-STAT/mTOR inhibition. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(30): 117813 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.117813]
|
|
33
|
-
"Thank you very much for facilitating the publication of our manuscript in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. I would like to sincerely appreciate the hard work of editorial team and peer reviewers in polishing the quality of the article. I express my sincere gratitude to the entire journal team and look forward to the future collaboration with this journal."
-
Shrestha UK. Mitigating challenges in endoscopic management of post-liver transplant biliary strictures. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 18(7): 123520 [DOI: 10.4253/wjge.123520]
|
|
34
|
-
"Thank you very much for facilitating the publication of our manuscript in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. I would like to sincerely appreciate the hard work of editorial team and peer reviewers in polishing the quality of the article. I express my sincere gratitude to the entire journal team and look forward to the future collaboration with this journal."
-
Shrestha UK. Preventive strategies for complications after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 18(7): 119987 [DOI: 10.4253/wjge.119987]
|
|
35
|
-
"The entire article publication process, from initial submission through editing, peer review, and final journal support, was smooth, well-organized, and highly professional. The peer-review process was particularly impressive, with detailed, thoughtful, and constructive comments that helped strengthen the manuscript significantly. Communication from the editorial team was timely, clear, and supportive at every stage. Overall, the journal provided an excellent publication experience, combining rigorous academic review with efficient coordination and responsive guidance for authors throughout the process."
-
Krishnamurthy R, Belenje A, Senthil S, Rani PK. Limited transscleral cyclophotocoagulation for silicone oil-induced glaucoma in eyes with good visual potential. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(21): 121479 [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.121479]
|
|
36
|
-
"Thank you for assisting with all steps of this process, the communication between us and the journal was easy and accessible. The peer review process was also smooth, and the feedback we received was excellent, specific, and actionable. We look forward to working with you more in the upcoming years."
-
Madhankumar S, Chuy DS, Hillman I, Thimirisetty S, Amara A, Tadros M. Portal hypertension in the era of endo-hepatology: Emerging diagnostic and therapeutic roles of endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasound. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2026; 18(7): 122980 [DOI: 10.4253/wjge.122980]
|
|
37
|
-
"Excellent journal and managing team as always. Very efficient handling and processing. All in all a very smooth and effortlessly process. I hope the journal continues to achieve more success and the same be reflected in the ever improving journal metrics. Hope to contribute in all ways possible to further expand its reach."
-
Goyal MK, Hatwal J, Desai R, Sehgal T, Batta A. Do biomarkers matter? Cardiovascular risk stratification in Asian patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in the era of fibrosis-centric assessment. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(28): 117181 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.117181]
|
|
38
|
-
"The review process was outstanding. Everything was smooth and clear from submission to publication. The reviewers provided thoughtful, constructive, and insightful feedback that significantly improved the overall quality of the paper. Their comments were detailed, fair, and instrumental in strengthening both the presentation and the scientific content of the manuscript. Additionally, the editorial team was consistently supportive, prompt, and helpful throughout the entire process. Their professionalism, clear communication, and efficient handling of each stage made the publication experience both seamless and highly positive. I truly appreciate the dedication of everyone involved and would be pleased to submit future work to this journal."
-
Porto AG, Zappulla P, Sgarito G, Conti S. High-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: There is still a country for “old men”. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(7): 120973 [DOI: 10.4330/wjc.120973]
|
|
39
|
-
"The review process was truly outstanding. From initial submission to final publication, every single step was smooth, clear, and user-friendly. The reviewers provided thoughtful, constructive feedback that significantly enhanced the overall quality of my paper. Throughout every stage, the editorial team was remarkably supportive, prompt, and helpful. It was a wonderful experience from start to finish."
-
Nagoba BS, Bhavthankar SS, Gavkare AM. Decoding the glycemic paradox: The imperative for frailty-centered inpatient diabetes care. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(21): 123085 [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.123085]
|
|
40
|
-
"The editors of this journal demonstrated exceptional patience and professionalism throughout the review process. They not only meticulously identified areas for improvement in the manuscript but also provided numerous insightful and constructive suggestions, which played a pivotal role in enhancing the article's quality. We look forward to incorporating these valuable insights in future collaborations to produce even more outstanding and impactful publications."
-
He ZH, Wu LK, Liu H, Bai LY, Du JJ, Ma KY, Wang Y, Zhao M. Landiolol attenuates atrial remodeling in septic rats by upregulating calumenin. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(7): 120097 [DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v18.i7.120097]
|
|
41
|
-
"I did not complete the Author's Evaluation because I did not see I had to do it. Maybe with this, the journal has to be more specific. The list of required things to publish is long.... maybe some requirements could be avoided. The review process for us was fair and fast. We would recommend the journal for the publication of clinical data.
Best wishes."
-
Brito-Toledo I, Sansón-Riofrío JA, Cervantes-Díaz MT, de Anda-González J, Medrano-Guzmán R, Moreno-González E, Vadillo E, Ibarra A. Factors associated with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: A Mexican retrospective study. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(7): 119971 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i7.119971]
|
|
42
|
-
"We thank the reviewers and the editorial team. The reviewers gave us practical suggestions, and we tried to take them all into account — this really improved our work. The editor also helped us revise the summary table; it's now much clearer and easier to read. We would be happy to publish with your journal again in the future."
-
Pereverzeva KG, Yakushin SS. Lyme carditis with pericarditis: A review of clinical cases. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(7): 121524 [DOI: 10.4330/wjc.121524]
|
|
43
|
-
"The editorial and peer-review process was professional, thorough, and constructive. The reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial office was responsive, and communication throughout the submission, revision, and production process was timely and efficient. We appreciate the support of the editorial team and thank the journal for the opportunity to publish our work."
-
Popescu DC, Diaconu M, Țînț D, Nechita AC. Left and right ventricular echocardiographic patterns in cardiogenic pulmonary edema: An exploratory retrospective study. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(7): 121228 [DOI: 10.4330/wjc.121228]
|
|
44
|
-
"Overall, I am satisfied with the manuscript submission and publication process. The online system was clear and easy to use, and the instructions provided at each stage were helpful. The peer-review, revision, language-editing, and production procedures were handled efficiently and professionally. Communication from the editorial office was timely and informative. I have no specific concerns or additional comments regarding the publication charges or the electronic and online publication process. Thank you for your assistance throughout the process."
-
Cao MY, Chen YF, Liao YX, Yang Q, Lin SY, Li Y, Weng J, Huang XX, Gao XY, Wang GB, Shan HB, Li JJ. Endoscopic ultrasonography lesion thickness predicts deep invasion in gastric cancer: Development and temporal validation of a preoperative model. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(7): 118867 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i7.118867]
|
|
45
|
-
"The article “MiR‑26a as a stage‑dependent biomarker and therapeutic regulator of inflammation in knee osteoarthritis” was published fast and early in the World Journal of Orthopaedics, underscoring its translational and clinical relevance. By spotlighting MiR‑26a, the study advances understanding of molecular pathways that govern inflammation and disease progression, offering a promising biomarker for stage‑specific diagnosis and a potential therapeutic target. The journal’s expedited editorial process reflects its commitment to disseminating impactful discoveries without delay, ensuring that clinicians, researchers, and educators gain timely access to emerging evidence. This early publication accelerates dialogue on precision medicine in osteoarthritis, bridging laboratory insights with patient‑centered applications. It strengthens global collaboration, fosters innovation in regenerative orthopaedics, and highlights the importance of rapid knowledge translation in shaping future strategies for joint preservation and inflammation control."
-
Gunamala V, Hari R, Jeyaraman N, Nallakumarasamy A, Muthu S, Jeyaraman M. MiR 26a as a stage-dependent biomarker and therapeutic regulator of inflammation in knee osteoarthritis. World J Orthop 2026; 17(7): 120195 [DOI: 10.5312/wjo.120195]
|
|
46
|
-
"Dear members of the Editorial office, we are thankful for the opportunitx to publush in the World journal of cardiology. The whole experience of preparing and submitting the manuscript and afterwards the reviewiing process were very helpful in improving the quality of our text. Finally, the production process and its handling was highly profesdional, therefore we are grateful for every step. Kind regards Authors"
-
Kos N, Zeljković I, Golubic K, Radeljic V, Erceg M, Cigrovski Berkovic M, Delic-Brkljacic D, Bulj N. Reply: Culprit coronary occlusion as a stronger short-term prognostic marker over electrocardiographic pattern in acute myocardial infarction. World J Cardiol 2026; 18(7): 123995 [DOI: 10.4330/wjc.123995]
|
|
47
|
-
"We sincerely appreciate the constructive and insightful peer-review reports, which significantly contributed to improving the scientific quality, clarity, and overall presentation of our article, “Preventive Strategies in Hepatology: The Role of Multiparametric Assessment of Portal Hypertension in Chronic Liver Disease.” We were highly satisfied with the quality and thoroughness of the peer-review process, as well as with the time allocated to the evaluation of the manuscript. We are also grateful to the editorial team for their professionalism, kindness, and patience while awaiting completion of the language certification process. The quality of the scientific and language editing was excellent, and we particularly appreciated the careful preparation and presentation of the figures and tables, which substantially enhanced the readability and visual quality of the published article. The support and guidance provided by the reviewers and editorial team throughout the publication process were highly valued."
-
Peltec A, Sporea I. Preventive strategies in hepatology: Role of multiparametric assessment of portal hypertension in chronic liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(29): 119106 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.119106]
|
|
48
|
-
"I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the editorial team for their professionalism and dedication throughout the entire review and publication process. The handling of my manuscript was prompt, transparent, and highly efficient. Every stage—from initial submission to final acceptance—was managed with great care and responsibility. I truly appreciate the constructive feedback and the supportive communication from the editors. This journal sets a high standard for academic publishing. I wish the journal continued success and an even brighter future."
-
Zhang SH, Zhang JP, Song LL, Wu LL, Li ZQ, He YF, Deng RF, Ma WL, Zhang C, Zhang B, Yu LP. Metabolic feature-based clustering for subtype identification and longitudinal outcome predictions in the Chinese prediabetic population. World J Diabetes 2026; 17(7): 119604 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.119604]
|
|
49
|
-
"I am pleased to share my experience with the publication process at World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. Overall, I found the experience to be highly positive and professional. The submission system was straightforward to navigate, and the editorial office provided clear instructions at every stage. The peer review process was rigorous but fair—the reviewers offered thoughtful and constructive comments that helped me significantly strengthen my manuscript. I was particularly impressed by the responsiveness of the editorial team; from initial submission to final acceptance, the entire process took approximately three months. I also appreciated the journal's transparent publication policies and their careful attention to ethical and statistical rigor. Based on my experience, I consider this journal a reliable and trustworthy platform for researchers in gastrointestinal oncology, and I would certainly recommend it to my colleagues."
-
Xu KZ, Hu WJ, Shang YH, Miao YD, Wang LN. Modified frailty index and systemic immune-inflammation enable biological risk stratification in geriatric colorectal cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(7): 119003 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i7.119003]
|
|
50
|
-
"It's been a pleasure to publish the work in the World Journal of Clinical Cases. The submission site has evolved and is much more user-friendly. Their Citation submission and correction software have made citation correction and editing much easier.
The review process is fast and smooth. The editorial process is smooth and very thorough. The vigilance and attention to detail of the editorial staff is excellent. They are very accommodating and patient in their correspondence.
Once the manuscript is through the editorial process, in the production department, their layout, formatting, and production quality is excellent.
All in all, been a pleasure to work with the editorial staff."
-
Romeo J, Surani S, Parsi S, Ratnani I, Kashyap R. Twenty-first century innovations in neuroradiology treatments. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(20): 121727 [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.121727]
|
