|
1
|
-
"The submission, review, editing, and all processes were fair and objective. The reviewers were helpful with their comments and suggestions. The process is easy to navigate and necessary to ensure that articles are of high academic quality and rigor. The communication is appropriate between the journal, the publisher, and the authors."
-
Hudgi A, Woodcock A, Mirza A, Okiye P, Kemple B, Sifuentes H, Sridhar S. Pancreatic cancer: Recent epidemiological trends and risk determinants. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(31): 119810 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.119810]
|
|
2
|
-
"The peer review process to publication is extremely long and complicated. The responses from the emails were somehow slow and often needs a follow up email. If we provide the MS for publication and also paying a significant amount to have it published, this is the first MS publication for the author evaluation to be mandatory which is very annoyed. Plan not to submit any more MS to this journal system in the future."
-
Kim AK, Lin SY, Liu HN, Jain S, Gade TP, Shieh FS, Hamilton J, Hann HW, Chang TT, Goryunov D, Wang Z, Su YH. Urinary cell-free DNA as a noninvasive liquid biopsy for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(33): 118587 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.118587]
|
|
3
|
-
"I hold high regard for World Journal of Gastroenterology as a top-tier Q1 international journal in gastroenterology and hepatology. It maintains rigorous, transparent peer review procedures and delivers constructive, detailed revision feedback efficiently, greatly helping authors refine study methodology, data presentation and manuscript logic. The journal boasts an authoritative global editorial board covering multidisciplinary experts from dozens of countries, and publishes high-quality original clinical research, translational studies and case reports that bridge basic science and clinical practice. It provides an outstanding open-access platform to share digestive disease research worldwide, with full indexing in SCIE, PubMed and Scopus to guarantee broad visibility and citation potential. The editorial and production teams are responsive and meticulous throughout the whole publication workflow, offering thoughtful guidance on figure optimization, format standardization and ethical statements. I sincerely appreciate the professional support and academic standards upheld by this journal and would strongly recommend it to peers engaged in gastroenterology research."
-
Kang BY, Bai H, Ni K, Qiao YH, Li YL, Wang YQ, Wang Q, Zhu J, Li JP. Artificial intelligence-integrated multimodal data-assisted magnetic resonance imaging for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy decision-making in cT1-2N0 rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(33): 118584 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.118584]
|
|
4
|
-
"The peer review process is standardized and efficient. The reviewer comments are targeted, professional and objective, which effectively guides the revision and improvement of my manuscript, helps me supplement research details and optimize the logical structure of the paper. I am fully satisfied with the whole peer review work and the thoughtful suggestions put forward by reviewers."
-
Jiang ZZ, Yu S, Zhu ZF. Association of topical Tongxuekang Fumigation-washing with early wound recovery after hemorrhoidectomy: A retrospective cohort study. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(33): 118686 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.118686]
|
|
5
|
-
"I am satisfied with the manuscript editing and publishing process at the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. The editorial office communicated clearly and provided timely updates throughout the submission, peer-review, revision, and publication stages. The reviewers’ comments were constructive and relevant, helping to improve the scientific quality, clarity, and presentation of the manuscript. The editorial staff handled the process professionally and offered appropriate guidance when needed. Overall, the experience was efficient, transparent, and supportive, and I appreciate the efforts of the editors, reviewers, and production team in facilitating the publication of our work."
-
Ma TT, Tong J, Liu MY. Cardioprotective effects of remimazolam in elderly hypertensive patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery: A randomized controlled trial. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(8): 121785 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i8.121785]
|
|
6
|
-
"We sincerely appreciate the efforts of the editors, reviewers, language editors, and production team throughout the publication process. Communication was clear and professional, and the editorial and reviewer comments contributed meaningfully to improving our manuscript. We are pleased to see the article successfully published in World Journal of Gastroenterology and thank the journal team for their support and assistance."
-
Tu HS, Chen ML, Hong J, Li S, He L. Stage-aware programmed death ligand 1 assessment in gastric cancer: Implications for perioperative immunotherapy. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(33): 118672 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.118672]
|
|
7
|
-
"The overall editorial and publication process was satisfactory; however, the interval between final manuscript acceptance and definitive publication was considerably longer than expected. Shortening the post-acceptance production timeline would substantially improve the author experience, particularly given that, at this stage, the manuscript has already completed peer review and all substantive editorial requirements. A more efficient transition from acceptance to online publication would therefore be highly appreciated."
-
Fiore M. Letter to the Editor: From antibiotic exposure to antibiotic intensity: Rethinking inpatient stewardship in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(33): 118868 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.118868]
|
|
8
|
-
"We sincerely appreciate the editorial team and peer reviewers of the World Journal of Gastroenterology for their professional and constructive handling of our manuscript. The reviewers provided insightful and balanced comments on the scientific methodology, presentation of the results, and clinical relevance of our study. Their suggestions helped us clarify several important issues and substantially improve the rigor, readability, and overall quality of the manuscript. Communication with the editorial and production teams was clear and efficient throughout the submission, revision, and publication process. Overall, we are satisfied with our publishing experience and grateful to everyone who contributed to the successful publication of our work."
-
Zhang J, Zhu ML, Xie YX, Fan YQ, Zhang W, Liu SS, Yu XM, Wang W, Fu XY. Development and validation of a tongue image-clinical nomogram for detection of advanced colorectal adenoma. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(33): 119646 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.119646]
|
|
9
|
-
"We are very grateful to the editorial board, the editor-in-chief, the language editors, and the production team for their rigorous and efficient handling of our manuscript. The peer-review process was thorough and constructive; each reviewer provided insightful suggestions that genuinely strengthened our work. The editorial decisions were communicated clearly and promptly, and the production team’s attention to detail during copyediting and proofreading was impressive. The online submission and tracking system was intuitive and reliable, which made the entire process smooth and transparent. We also appreciate the journal’s policy of publishing author evaluations and reader comments, as it fosters an open and collaborative scientific community. If we were to offer one minor suggestion, it would be to provide more detailed formatting templates for figures and references to further reduce the revision burden. Overall, we have full confidence in the journal’s credibility and would gladly submit our future work here. Thank you for your dedicated service to the research community."
-
Xu JL, Ge ZW, Wu CW, Wang YH, Mao JD. Multidisciplinary care for colorectal cancer brain metastases with headache as initial symptom: A case report and literature review. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(8): 119679 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.119679]
|
|
10
|
-
"The format of the article before submission does not need to meet the requirements of the magazine format, and can be modified after formal editing or acceptance. Modifying the format not only slows down the manuscript review process, but also affects the rapid publication of new reports. After removing unimportant submission requirements such as formatting, not only will the quantity of manuscripts increase, but the quality will also correspondingly improve, which is conducive to the rapid communication and publication of new discoveries."
-
Xing YR, Wang SF, Dai JJ, Xu XG, Mao WJ. Unlocking the metastatic switch: The RHEB-CSF1R complex ignites epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer by autophagy. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(8): 119680 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i8.119680]
|
|
11
|
-
"Excellence in all steps. I am very satisfied with the way your journal handles the publication process. Every step has been conducted professionally and efficiently. Although there was a slight delay in the final stage after the proofreading process, it was still within an acceptable timeframe. Overall, I am very satisfied with the entire publication process, and I would rate my overall experience as excellent.
Assoc.Prof. Klaita Srisingh"
-
Srisingh K, Sribuarom N, Suasing C, Inkate S. Effectiveness of a structured protocol for the prevention of acute respiratory tract infections in daycare centers: A quasi-experimental study. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(3): 121288 [DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.121288]
|
|
12
|
-
"We sincerely appreciate the editorial office and reviewers for their efficient, professional, and constructive handling of our manuscript. The reviewers’ insightful, balanced, and timely comments helped us substantially improve the quality and clarity of our work. We also appreciate the smooth communication and support provided by the editorial team throughout the submission and revision process.
We would, however, like to highlight one concern regarding the language editing charges requested after conditional acceptance. The charges were unexpectedly high and had not been clearly communicated at the time of submission, which placed an additional financial burden on us. As the manuscript was invited, we had not anticipated such additional charges. We appreciate that the editorial office subsequently considered our situation, allowed us to pay part of the amount, and waived the remaining charges. We hope that all applicable fees can be clearly communicated to authors at the outset to ensure greater transparency.
Overall, we are grateful for the constructive editorial and peer-review experience and thank the entire team for their time and dedication."
-
Nahid E, Ahmad MF, Shafique MA. Congenital aphallia: From embryology to management - a focused minireview. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(3): 121760 [DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.121760]
|
|
13
|
-
"The peer‑review reports are extremely helpful for improving the quality of my manuscript. The reviewers put forward thoughtful and constructive comments from different research perspectives, which help me identify many ignored defects and shortcomings in my paper. I have learned a lot during revision. Generally speaking, these peer‑review reports are well‑balanced, fair and objective."
-
Rao ZC, Xu CY, Hua LY, Fang ZR, Zhu CY, Zhang YM. Visceral fat area and red-blood-cell-related indices in adults with type 2 diabetes: Cross-sectional evidence of nonlinear associations. World J Diabetes 2026; 17(8): 121923 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.121923]
|
|
14
|
-
"We greatly appreciate the efficient editorial work and constructive peer‑review for our manuscript in World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology (WJGO). Insightful comments from reviewers helped improve the quality and rigor of our manuscript. The editorial office kept smooth communication during submission, revision and production. We are satisfied with the publishing experience and will consider submitting further manuscripts to WJGO."
-
Chen GL, Liu JH. Expression of tensin 4 in hepatocellular carcinoma and its role in epithelial-mesenchymal transformation. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(8): 123710 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.123710]
|
|
15
|
-
"The peer-review process was thorough, constructive, and helpful. The reviewers raised relevant scientific and methodological points that enabled us to clarify the manuscript and improve the presentation of our results. Their comments were fair, objective, and clearly communicated. We greatly appreciate the reviewers’ valuable contribution to strengthening the final version of our article."
-
Basina O, Derova J, Krumina N, Zolovs M, Lejniece S, Derovs A. Disrupted coupling between ferritin and iron absorption in enteropathy-related anemia: Evidence for a dual-pathway model. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(31): 119263 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.119263]
|
|
16
|
-
"Our article was originally submitted for WJGE but was reccomended to be moved to WJCC. We commend the ease of access to language editting through BPG's list of recommendations. The peer-review process was highly accountable, with detailed and comprehensive feedback that helped us substantially improve our methodology before the second round of review. The editorial and publishing processes are remarkably efficient for a peer-review journal, despite the tight deadline for manuscript revision. Overall, we are very satisfied with the entire publication process."
-
Prawira T, Fauzi A, Makmun D, Rumende CM, Yunihastuti E, Maulahela H, Roosheroe AG, Susilo A, Halim PP. Comparison of electrogastrography findings in patients with dyspepsia with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(22): 122765 [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.122765]
|
|
17
|
-
"The authors are very satisfied with the editorial handling and the overall publication process of this manuscript. We sincerely appreciate the Editor's professional guidance, the reviewers' insightful and constructive feedback, and the prompt communication from the Editorial Office throughout all stages. We believe the manuscript has been substantially improved thanks to this rigorous and efficient review process, and we are pleased to confirm our acceptance of the final version for publication."
-
Luo Y, Zhou SP, Guo R. Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 rs5498 in North India: Genetic spark for diabetic retinopathy inflammasome, not yet a clinical beacon. World J Diabetes 2026; 17(8): 116870 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.116870]
|
|
18
|
-
"We would like to express our sincere appreciation to the editorial office and the reviewers for their efficient and professional handling of our manuscript. The editorial team processed our submission promptly with great care and attention to detail, and the reviewers returned their constructive comments in a timely manner. Their feedback was not only insightful but also delivered in a respectful and author-friendly tone, which we truly appreciated throughout the entire process. However, we did encounter one technical issue: the proof PDF could not be downloaded from the F6Publishing system, which caused some inconvenience during the proofreading stage. We would kindly suggest that the platform be checked to ensure such issues are resolved in the future. Overall, we are very satisfied with the editorial and review process, and we thank the entire team for their hard work and dedication."
-
Xu AP, She SP, Xiao YS, Lang J, Yuan JF, Zeng YF. Nuclear localization of proteasome subunit beta 5 serves as an independent prognostic biomarker and promotes invasion in colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(8): 122057 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.122057]
|
|
19
|
-
"We are greatly satisfied with the thoughtful manuscript‑editing service，the smooth‑going publishing process, the time spent, and the help from the editors. The journal boasts rigorous reviewing standards and outstanding overall quality. We sincerely hope to submit and publish more our valuable research findings in this reputable journal for future academic exchanges."
-
Zhang J, Xi B, Li J, Wen L, Deng Y, Wang CW, Zhang Y. Prophylactic cholecystectomy for asymptomatic gallstone disease: Two case reports and review of literature. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(8): 120889 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i8.120889]
|
|
20
|
-
"Gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis remains highly lethal, driven by complex interplay among genetic mutations, epithelial–mesenchymal transition, extracellular matrix remodeling, hypoxia–anoikis crosstalk, metabolic reprogramming, epigenetic regulation, and an immunosuppressive microenvironment. This review identifies promising biomarkers including ctDNA and exosomal non-coding RNAs, and therapeutic targets such as YAP/TEAD1, LOX, and C3-C3aR1, and advocates rational combination regimens to tackle drug resistance. Nonetheless, early detection, cellular heterogeneity, and safety concerns persist as key hurdles. This synthesis provides a practical framework for precision therapy and future investigations"
-
Yan HQ, Lai QQ, Huang MW, Wang TA, Wu LC, Qin YZ. Advances in molecular mechanism of gastric cancer peritoneal metastasis. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(8): 121799 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i8.121799]
|
|
21
|
-
"The peer review process was efficient and well-organized. The anonymous review mechanism was standard and rigorous, and the reviewers' comments were objective, constructive and detailed. The suggestions effectively helped me optimize the logic, experimental design and manuscript writing of my paper, and greatly improved the academic quality of the manuscript. I am fully satisfied with this peer review experience."
-
Huang XB, Deng Y, Gong SY, Yu M, Cai H. ASAP3 disrupts ASAP1-ARHGAP12 to inhibit RhoA and yes-associated protein/transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif, suppressing gastric cancer progression. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(8): 117876 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i8.117876]
|
|
22
|
-
"Great thanks to editors and reviewers for their professional guidance on our review about ELF3 in gastric cancer. The whole peer review revision and online publishing process was efficient, transparent and highly standardized. The valuable suggestions from reviewers effectively improved the academic logic, evidence interpretation and clinical translational discussion of our manuscript. We are fully satisfied with the high-quality service provided by World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology, and we intend to submit our follow-up related gastrointestinal oncology research to this journal in the future."
-
Yan YJ, Yang Z, Chao RY, Shi JL. E74-like E26 transformation-specific transcription factor 3 in gastric cancer: Functions, mechanisms, and clinical translation - unresolved issues. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(8): 120240 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v18.i8.120240]
|
|
23
|
-
"We sincerely thank the members of the Editorial Team and the peer reviewers for their valuable time, constructive comments, and insightful suggestions, which have greatly improved the quality of our manuscript. We also thank the production team for their efforts in enhancing the presentation of the manuscript through careful formatting of the figures and tables."
-
Reddy RT, Vaithiyam V, Hussain GZ, Arul Y, Sonika U, Dalal A, Srivastava S, Sachdeva S. Successful endoscopic fragmentation and removal of an impacted esophageal denture: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(22): 121636 [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.121636]
|
|
24
|
-
"On behalf of our research team, I wish to extend our heartfelt gratitude to the editorial board and reviewers of WJGO. Your rigorous peer review, insightful comments, and efficient handling greatly enhanced our manuscript. We also thank the production staff for their professionalism. Publishing in your esteemed journal is a true honor, and we deeply appreciate your commitment to quality science. This opportunity has been invaluable, and we look forward to possible future contributions. Thank you for your support and encouragement throughout this journey."
-
Zhou SQ, Ke QH. Letter to the Editor: Total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Navigating beyond surgical outcomes to holistic patient-centered care. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2026; 18(8): 116559 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.116559]
|
|
25
|
-
"I absolutely believe the journal focuses on high-quality peer review irrespective of anything, and I would absolutely want that to remain the standard for future publications with an aim to ultimately become a PubMed-indexed journal. I appreciate everything your team does to make this process accessible to us young scholars."
-
Chowdhary R, Iftequar Y, Anveshak F, Parikh A, Jindal K, Arora K, Chowdhary R. Digital twins in gastroenterology: From computational modeling to precision medicine and clinical translation. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2026; 7(2): 121977 [DOI: 10.35712/aig.121977]
|
|
26
|
-
"Given the current enhancement in AI-assisted writing capabilities, I propose that mandatory English polishing be not strictly necessary, and journals should strive to attract more submissions while screening articles of greater academic value. A high-quality journal is defined not by its impact factor alone, but by its editorial rigor, ethical standards, author fairness, publication speed, inclusivity, and the genuine scholarly value it adds to its field—both in what it publishes and how it engages with the research community. World Journal of Diabetes is on the way to the best."
-
Zhan YH, Zhang XF. Letter to the Editor: Serum bile acid profiling for diabetic gastrointestinal neuropathy: Promise and pitfalls. World J Diabetes 2026; 17(8): 117130 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.117130]
|
|
27
|
-
"I would like to extend my heartfelt appreciation to the editorial team and reviewers of the Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology for their professional, prompt, and effective management of our manuscript. The rigorous and constructive peer-review process made a valuable contribution to improving the quality of our work. I also appreciated the intuitive and user-friendly online submission system, as well as the clear and timely communication maintained throughout the review and publication process."
-
Feyissa GD. Artificial intelligence applications in exposed endoscopic full-thickness resection vs thoracoscopic surgery for complex esophageal subepithelial lesions: Narrative review. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2026; 7(2): 121906 [DOI: 10.35712/aig.121906]
|
|
28
|
-
"The review process was extremely satisfying. The entire process, from submission to final publication, was very smooth, clear, and user-friendly. The reviewers provided insightful and constructive feedback that significantly enhanced the overall quality of our paper. Throughout every stage, the editorial team was remarkably supportive, prompt, and helpful. It was a wonderful experience to work and cooperate with the editorial team."
-
Mashalkar DM, Sonar MN, Kulkarni DV, Kendre VD, Warad BS, Nagoba BS. Empowering early breastfeeding: Determinants of timely initiation among the infants in a rural Indian medical centre. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(3): 118218 [DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.118218]
|
|
29
|
-
"We sincerely appreciate the editors and reviewers for devoting their valuable time to reviewing our manuscript and providing thoughtful and constructive comments. We consider the peer‑review report generally fair and objective, and these valuable suggestions have helped us identify multiple weaknesses in our original manuscript. We have carefully gone through every raised concern and made corresponding revisions to optimize text description, presentation of results and relevant references in the revised manuscript."
-
Liang X, Yang LX, Tao T, Ding WJ, Tang XY, Shang ZB, Zhou H, He Y, Sun Y. Role of CCM3 in lead-induced neurological damage in diabetes. World J Diabetes 2026; 17(8): 113938 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.113938]
|
|
30
|
-
"The editorial and peer-review process was professional, efficient, and constructive. The reviewers' comments were thoughtful and helped improve the quality and clarity of our manuscript. Communication with the editorial office was timely, and the production process was smooth from acceptance to publication. I appreciate the dedication of the entire editorial team and thank them for their support throughout the publication process. I would be pleased to consider submitting future work to this journal"
-
Amante MF. Artificial intelligence in histopathology of inflammatory bowel disease: Toward objective and reproducible assessment of disease activity. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2026; 7(2): 118230 [DOI: 10.35712/aig.v7.i2.118230]
|
|
31
|
-
"I must thank the Editor for entrusting me with the responsibility of writing a review on an important topic. The peer review was good, and the time taken was short. The whole process of editing, proofreading, and checking was smooth and seamless.I am thankful to the whole team for their cooperation and approach; without this, this would have been difficyu;y"
-
Kaushik K, Pathania J, Singh PK, Dinkar M, Pathania V. Artificial intelligence and machine learning applications in abdominal tuberculosis diagnosis: A scoping review and translational roadmap. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2026; 7(2): 123751 [DOI: 10.35712/aig.123751]
|
|
32
|
-
"It was an invited review, and the entire process from submission to publication was smooth, efficient, and well organized. The editorial team was highly professional, responsive, and supportive throughout. The reviewers provided thoughtful, constructive, and insightful comments that significantly strengthened the manuscript and improved its overall scientific quality and clarity."
-
Majeed AA, Butt AS. Leveraging artificial intelligence to differentiate benign from malignant biliary strictures: A step toward precision diagnosis. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2026; 7(2): 118476 [DOI: 10.35712/aig.118476]
|
|
33
|
-
"We are pleased that our manuscript got accepted for publication in your honorable journal. This work represents original research that has not no similar papers published previously elsewhere. We believe the findings provide meaningful insights into the field and will be of interest to the journal’s readership.
We appreciate your time and positive comments and look forward for further innovative/interesting papers and topics to submit"
-
Attieh P, Al Hazzouri A, Moubayed R, Youssef T, Karam K, Farhat SG. Advances in artificial intelligence-based colonoscopic tools and modalities: Transforming colorectal cancer detection and management. Artif Intell Gastroenterol 2026; 7(2): 120803 [DOI: 10.35712/aig.120803]
|
|
34
|
-
"This journal's submission system is remarkably well‑designed, with an intuitive dashboard, swift file processing, clear step‑by‑step guidance, and instant email confirmations, while its integrated reviewer recommendation tools and detailed reporting features greatly assist editorial decision‑making, and the overall user experience is so smooth that authors can track their manuscript's progress effortlessly, making it one of the best systems I have encountered."
-
Wang XP, Liu C, Zhang HW, Zhai JM, Zhu JX, Sun GD, An YH, Yang HJ, Jing DS, Liu DC. H3K18 La-METTL5-CCT2 signaling axis promotes colorectal cancer progression by inhibiting pyroptosis. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(31): 118472 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.118472]
|
|
35
|
-
"The overall process during the submission and handling of the manuscript was satisfactory. However, there is one aspect that can be improved. This is when the manuscript is accepted by the magazine. The Proof has been divided into two parts. The first part is still in Word format. I think the Proof can be replaced by an online Proof system instead of the current two-step process. This way, it can ensure that the author won't make mistakes due to the Proof. The editor will not miss any information simply because the authors have different ways of making annotations in the Proof. Overall, the submission process went relatively smoothly."
-
Wang JL, Niu YX, Li HX, Cui FC, Chen X. Clinical significance of mesenchymal stem cells exosomal microRNAs in predicting prognosis and inflammatory response of esophageal cancer. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(7): 119714 [DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.119714]
|
|
36
|
-
"we are satisfied with every editorial process that the journal come across from the submission to the online publication of mor maunscript. Besides, we are happy for the copperation and support that we received from the editorial office and the review board contributing for the sucessfull publication of the manuscript."
-
Assefa AN, Haile JM, Woldearegay AG. Factors influencing child vaccine communication practices in Gondar town. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(3): 117704 [DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.117704]
|
|
37
|
-
"It took some time for paper to get published after acceptance but the review and editing process were exact and helped bring out an excellent manuscript. Enjoyed the process and the online process allowed for real time follow up of article progress through the editorial and publication cycles. Should consider more frequent publication rather than quarterly as the journal becomes more recognized."
-
Burjonrappa SC, Eranki S, Capellan J. Pediatric kidney transplant disparities. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(3): 117940 [DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.117940]
|
|
38
|
-
"Our experience with World Journal of Psychiatry was highly satisfactory. The editorial team handled our manuscript on dysphagia risk in psychiatric inpatients with professionalism and efficiency, providing constructive peer-review feedback within a reasonable timeframe. The production process was smooth, with clear communication at every stage from acceptance to final publication. We appreciate the journal's commitment to rigorous yet fair evaluation, and we would confidently recommend it to colleagues seeking a reliable platform for psychiatric research."
-
Liu ZQ, Feng YQ, Fu CY, Wang JH, Zhang KX, Yuan XC, Li R, Zhang CC, Huang GH, Zhang YB, Li K. Epidemiology and associated factors of screening-identified dysphagia risk in psychiatric inpatients. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(8): 118764 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.118764]
|
|
39
|
-
"I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the editorial team and anonymous reviewers for their rigorous, fair and insightful peer review report. Every comment raised by the reviewers is highly pertinent and of great academic value. Through responding to the review questions, I supplemented missing experimental evidence, adjusted the discussion framework, updated relevant latest references, and corrected several ambiguous descriptions and insufficient data explanations in the original manuscript. The objective feedback effectively identified the deficiencies of my research and guided me to strengthen the reliability and innovation of this work. The whole peer review process brings tremendous improvements to my manuscript, and I benefit a lot from this revision experience."
-
Fan Y, Wang SN, Jiang B, Li YY, Zhu CY, Liao XH, Zhang FS, Wang YK. Automatic recognition of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in pathological biopsy images of the gastric mucosa. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(32): 120382 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.120382]
|
|
40
|
-
"One point I would particularly like to commend is that the journal allows authors to submit article figures in PowerPoint (PPT) format. I believe this not only facilitates the submission process for authors but also makes it more convenient for the journal to modify the figure styles accordingly. Although I am very satisfied with the overall submission process, especially the quick response from the reviewers, I believe it is unreasonable to require a designated language polishing company."
-
Zhang TS, Zhu XM, Wen RB, Zhou LQ, Gong HF, Yu ED, Wang H, Li G, Zhou WP, Hao LQ, Yu GY, Zhang W. Clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic hybrid surgery for simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(32): 119375 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i32.119375]
|
|
41
|
-
"We appreciate the journal’s comprehensive peer‑review work. However, the time span from formal acceptance to online publication was considerable. We would like to raise a question regarding the mandatory statistical‑scientific review step. Many biomedical journals do not adopt this extra reviewing procedure. It would be helpful for authors if the journal could re‑evaluate the necessity of this extra step and streamline the editorial workflow to accelerate publication speed for accepted manuscripts."
-
Yang HY, Zhang LL, Hu SQ, Yang QP, Liu DL. Peri-colonoscopy hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: Temporal patterns and asymptomatic presentation. World J Diabetes 2026; 17(8): 121326 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.121326]
|
|
42
|
-
"We are highly satisfied with how our manuscript was managed throughout the editorial workflow. The peer review proceeded at an impressive pace, maintaining a reasonable, consistent schedule spanning from initial submission to the ultimate editorial verdict. The referee evaluations were impartial, comprehensive, and delivered with great professionalism. Their insightful comments played a vital role in refining and elevating our work. We sincerely value the thorough, solution-oriented review practice adopted by the World Journal of Diabetes."
-
Zhang JW. Letter to the Editor: Leptin gene hypomethylation - a missing epigenetic link in lean type 2 diabetes? World J Diabetes 2026; 17(8): 116265 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.116265]
|
|
43
|
-
"The peer review process organized by the journal was exceptionally smooth, convenient, and efficient. The insightful and professional comments from the reviewers were invaluable in improving our study and greatly enhanced the overall rigor of the manuscript. We extend our deepest appreciation to the editors for their hard work and excellent communication throughout the process, and to the reviewers for sharing their profound academic knowledge. The successful publication of this article is truly a result of the outstanding collaborative efforts between the authors, the editorial team, and the peer reviewers."
-
Wang SF, Guo HC, Peng XW. Beyond adenomatous polyposis coli: Redefining the genetic architecture of familial adenomatous polyposis through recurrent variants of uncertain significance. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(32): 117091 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.117091]
|
|
44
|
-
"On behalf of all co-authors, I wish to express our sincere gratitude for publishing our work in World Journal of Gastroenterology. After a rigorous six-month journey from submission to acceptance, we are honored to see our manuscript appear in this prestigious journal.
We deeply appreciate the editorial office's professionalism and efficiency throughout the entire process, from initial screening to copyediting and production. The transparent workflow and clear guidance greatly facilitated our progress.
We are especially indebted to the anonymous reviewers, whose incisive critiques and constructive suggestions substantially strengthened our manuscript. Their expertise pushed us to refine our arguments and address methodological concerns with greater precision, ultimately producing a more robust contribution to the field.
We also value the journal's commitment to scholarly excellence and its open-access model, which ensures broad dissemination of our findings to researchers and clinicians worldwide. The six-month timeline, though demanding, was marked by productive exchanges that transformed our initial draft into its final published form.
We extend our heartfelt thanks to the handling editors and production staff for their meticulous attention to detail. This has been a constructive and memorable academic experience. We look forward to contributing to WJG again in the future."
-
Chen GL, Lu KK, Zhang WX, Lai PP, Xu YT, Han YF, Zhou ZH, Huang W, Wang YH, Zhang Y, Xian XD. Depleting apolipoprotein C3 alleviates acute pancreatitis in hamsters but not in mice. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(31): 119570 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.119570]
|
|
45
|
-
"We would like to sincerely thank the editorial team, reviewers, and production staff for their professionalism and support throughout the publication process. The review process was constructive, efficient, and helpful in improving the quality of our manuscript. We are very satisfied with the communication, editorial assistance, and overall experience. We appreciate the efforts of everyone involved and look forward to submitting our future work to this journal"
-
Monkoti Manzi MG, Nsibu C, Bodi J, Jouvet P. Severe malaria-bacterial sepsis co-infection among critically ill children admitted to pediatric emergency departments in Kinshasa. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(3): 119162 [DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.119162]
|
|
46
|
-
"Overall, my experience with the journal was very positive. The editorial process was professional, transparent, and constructive, and the reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the manuscript. The only drawback was the exceptionally long interval between the manuscript's acceptance and the upload of the final version. Shortening this post-acceptance period would further enhance the overall author experience."
-
Papadakos SP, Katsaros I, Liatsou E, Argyrou A, Schizas D. Reflux self-medication and limited healthcare consultation: Systemic inadequacies in Barrett’s esophagus screening, surveillance, and management. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(31): 117258 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.117258]
|
|
47
|
-
"Dear Editors,
I am writing to express my profound appreciation for featuring my work in your distinguished journal. My particular thanks go to the reviewers and the editorial team, whose rigorous and constructive feedback was instrumental in strengthening the manuscript into a more compelling and refined piece of scholarship. I wish your journal every success in the years to come.
With kind regards,
Professor Olga V. Smirnova"
-
Smirnova OV, Sinyakov AA, Kasparov EV. Letter to the editor: Pathogenetic factors in the development of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(31): 122317 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.122317]
|
|
48
|
-
"I had a good experience with this journal. The submission system was straightforward, and the manuscript moved through each stage without delays. Review came back in a reasonable timeframe, and the reviewers clearly read the manuscript carefully — their comments were specific and actually improved the paper. The production quality was solid too: the PDF, figures, and tables were clean, and the online version reads well. Turnaround time and editorial policies were fair and transparent. I'd submit here again and have already recommended it to my colleagues."
-
Zhang P, Liu SM. Letter to the Editor: Mechanistic insights into tumor necrosis factor-α-mediated islet β-cell apoptosis in acute pancreatitis-associated abnormal glucose metabolism. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(31): 116501 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.116501]
|
|
49
|
-
"The entire process was exceptionally thorough and meticulous. The editors, reviewers and everyone involved in the publication process demonstrated remarkable attention to detail, carefully evaluating not only the scientific content but also the clarity, wording, grammar, punctuation, formatting, and overall presentation of the manuscript. Their constructive and highly detailed feedback significantly strengthened the quality of our work, and we appreciate the rigor and precision with which the manuscript was handled."
-
Shekar V, Lucke-Wold B. From risk stratification to precision surveillance: Interpreting early-warning models after laparoscopic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(31): 118374 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.118374]
|
|
50
|
-
"Thank you for the successful publication of our manuscript. I would like to inquire about when the article is expected to be indexed in PubMed.
Overall, the publication process was smooth and well managed. However, I found that responses to my emails were occasionally delayed. I would appreciate more timely communication in the future, as prompt updates are very helpful during the publication process.
Thank you again for your support, and I look forward to your response regarding the PubMed indexing timeline."
-
Zourob D, Teneiji AA, Miqdady M, Al Atrash E. Recurrent acute liver failure in infancy - a novel SCYL1 mutation: A case report. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(3): 120925 [DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.120925]
|
