|
1
|
-
"Dear editor-in-chief WJT,
Thank you so much for this opportunity to publish an article in this esteemed journal. Quality, processing of article, time management, and peer review process were commendable. your reference editing system is outstanding and very helpful for novice authors. Yours software support is very good.
Look forward to more contribution in future.
Regards
Vipin Kumar Goyal"
-
Goyal VK, Shekhrajka P, Mittal S. Perioperative considerations in kidney transplantation: An anaesthesiologist’s perspective. World J Transplant 2025; 15(4): 107662 [DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.107662]
|
|
2
|
-
"Our publishing experience with the World Journal of Transplantation was professional and transparent. The editorial team provided clear guidance, timely feedback, and constructive revisions. The review process was efficient, and communication remained prompt throughout. Overall, it was a transparent journey that significantly strengthened the quality and visibility of our work."
-
Abbas K, Mubarak M, Musharraf W, Aziz T, Zafar MN. Critical role of complement in antibody mediated rejection in kidney transplantation. World J Transplant 2025; 15(4): 108806 [DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.108806]
|
|
3
|
-
"I am satisfied with Journal’s Peer Review by Authors. The peer review report for my manuscript is fair and objective. The peer review report is of great help to my manuscript I am satisfied with the editing quality of the article. I am satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms"
-
Zhang ZY, Zhou M, Liu JJ, Zhang W. Folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells might function as potential biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(11): 113431 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i11.113431]
|
|
4
|
-
"We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the editorial team and all reviewers for their invaluable efforts in the publication of this paper. Your meticulous reviews, constructive suggestions and efficient processing have greatly improved the quality and rigor of our work.
Your professional insights and patient guidance helped us refine our arguments, clarify ambiguities and enhance the overall coherence of the manuscript. We truly appreciate the time, expertise and dedication you devoted to supporting academic communication.
This paper could not have been published smoothly without your earnest contributions, and we will continue to uphold rigorous academic standards in our future research. Thank you again for your invaluable support!"
-
Wang SY, Li ZM, Zhang MZ, Chen ZM, Liu X, Li YJ, Li PY, Yang GH, Xia YB, Xu TC. Endocrine-related neurological function recovery in pancreatic transplantation. World J Transplant 2025; 15(4): 106812 [DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.106812]
|
|
5
|
-
"We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the editorial team and all reviewers for their invaluable efforts in the publication of this paper. Your meticulous reviews, constructive suggestions and efficient processing have greatly improved the quality and rigor of our work.
Your professional insights and patient guidance helped us refine our arguments, clarify ambiguities and enhance the overall coherence of the manuscript. We truly appreciate the time, expertise and dedication you devoted to supporting academic communication.
This paper could not have been published smoothly without your earnest contributions, and we will continue to uphold rigorous academic standards in our future research. Thank you again for your invaluable support!"
-
Wu LZ, Huang YN, Chen Y, Ji YQ, Jin YW, Chen CX, Zhuang SY, Xu B, Xia YB, Xu TC. Chronic heart failure and heart transplantation: The relationship between autonomic function and cardiac performance. World J Transplant 2025; 15(4): 109951 [DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.109951]
|
|
6
|
-
"Thanks to the editorial office for publishing our manuscript. The timeline was short, and the review process was straightforward and constructive.
The importance of acknowledging barriers to liver transplantation in resource-limited countries like Mexico might be the first step toward achieving larger goals in providing better healthcare to recipients.
On behalf of all co-authors, we are pleased to contribute to the WJT."
-
Avila-Rojo JA, Martínez-Sánchez FD, Rosales-Rentería LA, Aguirre-Villarreal D, Contreras AG, Cruz-Martinez R, Servin-Rojas M, Ramírez-del Val A, Zamora-Valdés D, Leal-Leyte P, Aguirre-Valadez J, Paez-Zayas VM, Sánchez-Cedillo AI, Lugo-Baruqui A, Covarrubias-Esquer JD, García-Juárez FI, Ruiz I, García-Juárez I. Overcoming barriers and expanding opportunities in liver transplantation in Mexico. World J Transplant 2025; 15(4): 110496 [DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.110496]
|
|
7
|
-
"We sincerely appreciate the reviewers and editors for their helpful, generous and supportive engagement throughout the entire review process. Their thoughtful comments, careful reading of our work and constructive suggestions substantially strengthened the manuscript. At the same time, the process remained objective, fair and appropriately rigorous, ensuring that the scientific quality and clarity of this publication were maintained and improved."
-
Kannan SS, Sabapathy PK, Kattil ALT, Hakeem AR. Incisional hernia repair following liver transplantation: A meta-analysis. World J Transplant 2025; 15(4): 107578 [DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.107578]
|
|
8
|
-
"We are very happy with the evaluation process of our manuscript and we are grateful to the Editorial community of World Journal of Transplantation for the excellent service provided. Hopefully, the surgical technique described in this case report will help reducing the number of kidney transplant losses due to graft rupture. Certainly, we will continue considering BPG for future publications."
-
Campioli E, Sikharulidze A, Cenzi LM, Spagnoletti G, Ferraresso M, Favi E. Suture-free polyglactin 910 mesh repair of kidney graft rupture: A case report and review of literature. World J Transplant 2025; 15(4): 105597 [DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.105597]
|
|
9
|
-
"We are very happy with the evaluation process of our manuscript and we are grateful to the Editorial community of World Journal of Transplantation for the excellent service provided. Hopefully, the narrative review herein presented will help other clinicians involved in the care of kidney transplant patients expanding their knowledge on novel therapeutic options. Certainly, we will continue considering BPG for future publications."
-
Favi E, Morabito M. Obinutuzumab in kidney transplantation: Past, present, and future. World J Transplant 2025; 15(4): 108982 [DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.108982]
|
|
10
|
-
"The process is good in time. Only the publication period is too large. The peer review is very constructive. However the reviewers must be more specific in their comments in order to simplify the correcions for the manuscripts. The galley proof evaluation is a very simple process. Good for that. The criteria for publication are not only the high quality of the menuscript. Also includes main topics as plagiarism, ethics and is so good."
-
Careaga-Reyna G, Zetina-Tun HJ. Middle- and long-term survival of patients with heart transplant in Mexico from 1988 to 2023: A group experience. World J Transplant 2025; 15(4): 105732 [DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.105732]
|
|
11
|
-
"We are very satisfied with the entire process since submission to publication in World Journal of Transplantation. We would just like to point out that the process has been a bit long and it would be desirable for it to be a little shorter, although the experience has been satisfactory."
-
Muñoz-Serrano A, Citores MJ, Gutiérrez-Villanueva A, Moreno-Torres V, López-Ibor JV, Vicente N, Cuervas-Mons V. Chronic kidney disease at one year after liver transplantation: Role of changes in immunosuppression over three decades. World J Transplant 2025; 15(4): 108791 [DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.108791]
|
|
12
|
-
"We are very pleased with the submission and publication process. The editorial communication was clear and timely, and the reviewers provided constructive and relevant feedback. The overall workflow was efficient and professional. We appreciate the support provided throughout and look forward to the possibility of submitting our work to this journal again in the future."
-
Cheng H, Xia L, Yang HZ, Wei ZX, Zhang YT, Yang J. Role of advanced heart failure and transplant teams in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation management. World J Transplant 2025; 15(4): 108736 [DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.108736]
|
|
13
|
-
"We are happy with the submission. I hope that y the editor can provide us with additional invited papers. We look forward to working with BPG. The reviewing process needs work. It takes numerous months before reviewers are found. The system could be improved by slimlining the entire submission process. Other journals take 1-2 for complete publication."
-
Zeppieri M, Miotti G, Grando M. Interpreting the hazard zone: Factor V and lactate as critical indicators in severe early allograft injury. World J Transplant 2025; 15(4): 110310 [DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v15.i4.110310]
|
|
14
|
-
"I am very satisfied with the submission process this time. It would be even better if the layout fee could be cheaper. Also, the time from receiving the paper to its official publication is a bit long, it would be best if it could be shorter. Besides that, I have no other opinions."
-
Mao HQ, Yu FC, Hu DQ, Zhang LJ. Myc-associated zinc finger protein drives colorectal cancer metastasis through activating ubiquitin like with ring finger protein one. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(11): 109481 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i11.109481]
|
|
15
|
-
"I am very satisfied with all aspects, including the submission of the manuscript (the process is simple and easy to understand), peer review (which takes a short time), revision suggestions (which are highly targeted and professional and have great guiding significance), correction and verification. It will be strongly recommended to colleagues."
-
Pan ZL, Li MQ, Zhang J, Xue LY, Shi YP. Correlation of gut microbiota metabolite trimethylamine N-oxide with inflammatory levels and osteoporosis in patients with diabetic nephropathy. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(11): 109919 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i11.109919]
|
|
16
|
-
"We wish to extend our utmost gratitude to the editorial board of the World Journal of Psychiatry for the exemplary management of our submission.
The journey from initial manuscript submission through to the final decision was remarkably smooth, characterized by clarity and strong editorial support.
We found the reviewers' feedback to be exceptionally thought-provoking and practical, which was instrumental in refining and strengthening our paper.
Our appreciation also goes to the editors for their careful attention to detail and maintaining a consistently rapid communication flow.
Publishing our work with the World Journal of Psychiatry has been an excellent experience, and we eagerly anticipate the opportunity to partner again in the future."
-
Altınöz ŞT, Tarlacık LD, Engin E, Uzel Y, Doğan U, Altınöz AE. Unraveling the role of dysfunctional sleep beliefs: How chronotype shapes sleep quality and academic success in medical students. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(11): 109566 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i11.109566]
|
|
17
|
-
"It is with the utmost honor and immense pride that we present this edition of World Journal of Psychiatry. To be a part of the esteemed conversation within our industry is a privilege we hold dear. This publication stands as a testament to the power of great ideas, and we are deeply grateful to our contributors and readers for making it a vibrant platform for excellence and innovation."
-
Lang XL, Huang CC, Cui HY, Zhong HX, Shen MY, Zhao F. From physiology to psychology: An integrative review of menopausal syndrome. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(11): 108713 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i11.108713]
|
|
18
|
-
"I want to express my appreciate, It truely is such an honor to have this wonderful chance to published our work on prestigious World Journal of Orthpedics. I hope there will be more opportunity to submitt our research to World Journal of Orthpedics. The experience of the manuscript submit and revision reflects the profession and responsibility of this prestigious journal and the respect to the authors. In summary it is a very comfortable and enjoyable process, thank you!"
-
Chen YF, Ning K, Xie YY, Liu C, Ding YT, Tang ZW, Wen J, Xiao S, Li YF. Internal diseases and molecular mechanisms causing slipped capital femoral epiphysis in children. World J Orthop 2025; 16(11): 110155 [DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i11.110155]
|
|
19
|
-
"The editorial and production workflow was very smooth. The communication from the assistant editor and language editing team was timely and clear, and the peer-review comments were constructive and helpful for improving the quality of the manuscript. I appreciate the professionalism and responsiveness throughout the publication process. Thank you for the support in bringing this work to publication."
-
Cai J, Lu YB, Lv Y, Zhan XJ, Li T, Yang G, Ma YT, Ren JZ, Li B, Yu H, Liao SH, Guo YT, Qiu QP, Hong XP, Huang LB, Zhang Y, Huang SL. Reduced recurrence rate with a targeted approach in uncomplicated appendicitis treated with endoscopic direct vs retrograde therapy. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(42): 112106 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i42.112106]
|
|
20
|
-
"The publishing system was a very thorough process, with very strict norms and rules, with the goal to obtain the most qualitative result. We appreciate the common effort of the editorial team towards publishing a high standard article. While it has not been easy to comply with the rigours of the publishing, we are glad to have been given the opportunity for such experience."
-
Mănuc M, Duței CA, Mănuc TE, Chifulescu AE, Grama FA. Could artificial intelligence-powered colonoscopies change the future of colorectal cancer screening? World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(42): 111291 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i42.111291]
|
|
21
|
-
"The entire review process of the journal is objective and fair. The communication with the editor is timely and effective.And the reviewers' comments are professional and helpful. There are quite a few documents and materials needed for submission, so an appropriate longer time for revision of the article can be given."
-
Shi Y, Zhang Y, Zhou AD, Zou HY, Wang MM, Xu F, Cai MY. Association between circulating sex hormone levels and diabetic kidney disease in men and postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(11): 111366 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i11.111366]
|
|
22
|
-
"Dear Editorial Office,
Thank you very much for the professional handling and publication of my manuscript. Overall, I am very satisfied with the review and editorial process.
My only suggestion is regarding the initial submission guidelines. The requirements for preparing the first draft—especially details such as formatting and font specifications—were somewhat unclear and difficult to locate within the submission instructions. Clarifying or consolidating these guidelines in a more straightforward manner would greatly help authors ensure full compliance from the beginning and improve the overall submission experience.
Thank you again for your excellent work and support.
Best regards,"
-
Lin L, Zhang P, Wang YY, Cai YF, Wen LB, Chen WP, Xiao YF, Li ZK, Liu GY. Early vs conventional initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: A propensity-matched outcomes study. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(42): 110069 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i42.110069]
|
|
23
|
-
"I found the submission process systematic but bit cumbersome specially the reference submission which could have been made easier with some place for manual editing as well. The peer review quality was very good and that explains the high academic quality of the journal. However, I think instead of sending repeated mails about peer review process, only one mail compiling all reviewers' comments and editorial comments in one final mail."
-
Basu R, Bera S, Mondal S, Shah S, Swapnil K, Nanda R, Datta J, Mandal S, Goswami S, Baidya A, Sengupta N. Deficiency of anterior pituitary hormones in Noonan syndrome and its impact on response to growth hormone therapy. World J Clin Pediatr 2025; 14(4): 108897 [PMID: 41255695 DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.v14.i4.108897]
|
|
24
|
-
"I’m highly satisfied with World Journal of Gastroenterology (WJG). As a gastroenterology researcher, its 2.3-month peer review (matching its ~2.4-month average) impressed me. The editorial team was professional and responsive; reviewers offered targeted, constructive comments that boosted my study’s rigor. WJG’s ~85% acceptance rate maintained academic standards, with strict checks on scientific validity and innovation. It focuses on China-specific GI issues (e.g., high-incidence digestive tumors) and supports domestic scholars, serving as a top regional research platform. English polishing certification ensured language accuracy and international impact. WJG is reliable, efficient, and scholar-friendly—I strongly recommend it to gastroenterology researchers, especially those needing timely high-quality publication."
-
Yang Y, Chen WM. RGS4 in gastric cancer: A multifaceted regulator of focal-adhesion-kinase -phosphatidyl-inositol-3-kinase - protein-kinase-B signaling and epithelial-mesenchymal transition beyond tumor progression. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(41): 112642 [PMID: 41257280 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i41.112642]
|
|
25
|
-
"We would like to express our gratitude to the World Journal of Orthopedics for their support throughout our journey in publishing the article ‘Correlation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Biomarkers (Tissue Bridges) with Neurological Recovery Following Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.’ The submission, peer review, and publication process has been both rigorous and rewarding."
-
Singh R, Gautam S, Aggarwal S, Kaur S, Jain M. Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers (tissue bridges) with neurological recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury. World J Orthop 2025; 16(11): 110426 [DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i11.110426]
|
|
26
|
-
"The whole review process was very satisfactory to my team. I appreciate the publishing team for all their efforts. The process was very smooth, fast, transparent and scientific. It helped me a lot in improving my manuscript and I learnt a lot during this short and fruitful journey. I will refer this journal and this publishing house to my colleagues for submission of their manuscripts. My sincere regards."
-
Agrawal H, Agarwal N, Gupta N. Impact of gut microbiome on outcomes following endoscopic interventions in gastrointestinal disease. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(11): 110207 [PMID: 41256293 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i11.110207]
|
|
27
|
-
"I am thoroughly pleased with the publication process of my article. The peer-review process was exceptionally rigorous and constructive. The reviewers' insightful feedback significantly strengthened the manuscript. Furthermore, the editorial team was incredibly supportive, professional, and efficient throughout. My sincere thanks to everyone involved for their dedication and hard work."
-
Xu K, Wu DH, Zeng CJ, Guo JY, Xi DY, Wang MJ, Yao ZY, Feng AQ, Ji F, Yan XB, Ye LL, Li CY. Clinical predictors of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pyogenic liver abscess and nomogram construction: A retrospective analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(42): 112478 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i42.112478]
|
|
28
|
-
"As both an author and a reviewer for World Journal of Diabetes, I am very grateful for the efficient editorial process and professional communication. I have two very small, personal suggestions that you may consider for future development of the journal:
1. Website internationalization:
To further enhance the journal’s international visibility and accessibility for non-Chinese readers, you might consider moving towards a fully English user interface (or an easily switchable full-English version) for the journal website. I believe this would make it even more convenient for international authors, reviewers, and readers to navigate and submit manuscripts.
2. Print layout and visual style (purely aesthetic):
From a purely personal and aesthetic point of view, the printed layout could perhaps be made a bit more “minimalist” and academic in style. For example, slightly reducing the use of large areas of bright orange-red tones and making the “WJD” journal label a little smaller might give the printed pages a more understated and refined appearance, while still preserving the journal’s visual identity.
These are only minor, personal suggestions. Overall, I am very satisfied with my publishing experience with WJD and sincerely appreciate the efforts of the editorial and production team."
-
Guo YL, Niu WJ, Jiao HR, Li YP, Xu C, Zhou X, Wang J. Crosstalk between oxidative stress and inflammatory pathways: Natural therapeutic approaches for diabetic wound healing. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(11): 111400 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i11.111400]
|
|
29
|
-
"I am extremely satisfied with the entire submission process of my recent manuscript to World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. From the initial online submission to the prompt peer review feedback, and from the careful editorial revisions to the smooth final publication, every step was handled professionally, efficiently, and transparently. The editors and reviewers provided valuable, constructive comments that not only improved the quality of my paper but also deepened my understanding of the research field. I sincerely wish your journal continued success and further development, with its SCI impact factor rising steadily to attract more high-quality research from global scholars. I have already recommended your journal to several of my colleagues due to my positive experience, and I eagerly look forward to submitting my future research findings to your journal, hoping they will be favorably received and published. Thank you again for the excellent service and support throughout the process!"
-
Li F, Xie YL, Xu D, Lu CH, Wu JW, Ma JX, Guan GX, Wang HX. Comparison of different anastomosis methods in laparoscopically assisted left hemicolectomy for colon cancer. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(11): 111117 [PMID: 41256300 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i11.111117]
|
|
30
|
-
"We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the editor and reviewers for their valuable comments and constructive feedback throughout the review process.
We appreciate the editor’s professional handling and guidance throughout the review process.
We truly appreciate the opportunity to publish our work in your esteemed journal.
We hope that our findings will contribute to further discussions and future developments in this research area.
Sincerely,
Shoko Sagawa"
-
Sagawa S, Ito F, Nakatani M, Kurose S, Niiro E, Taniguchi M, Toyoda S, Sado T, Morita K. Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma presenting with malignant peritonitis and suspected to originate from the fallopian tube: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2025; 13(32): 110813 [PMID: 41256345 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i32.110813]
|
|
31
|
-
"My experience publishing in the World Journal of Psychiatry has been exceptionally positive, and I highly recommend it to clinical psychiatric researchers! The entire process from submission to online publication was efficient and smooth, perfectly aligning with the timelines required for promotion evaluations or project closures. The editorial team was highly responsive, addressing all inquiries promptly. Their thorough understanding of global psychiatric research trends ensured seamless communication, even for non-native English speakers. Reviewers’ comments were constructive and clinically relevant, emphasizing practical value rather than overly demanding groundbreaking findings. Minor revision suggestions were specific and actionable, with the acceptance notice received shortly after resubmission. Boasting a transparent peer-review process and a strong focus on real-world clinical significance, this journal strikes an excellent balance between academic rigor and accessibility. I have already recommended it to many colleagues in my department!"
-
Guo L, He LX, Wan PQ, Zhen XM, Xiao F, Wu WB, Su MH, Gao BH, Liu ZH. Meta-analysis of factors associated with the incidence of comorbid depression and anxiety in patients with chronic hepatitis B. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(11): 106164 [DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i11.106164]
|
|
32
|
-
"Resp sir/madam,
World J Gastrointest Oncol Peer review is vitally important to uphold the high standards of scholarly communications, and maintain the quality of individual article. It is also an important support for the researchers/ authors the articles.The feedback from reviewers and editors are used to improve our paper before it is published. These have clarity, constructiveness, and helpfulness.Quality is for the result of high intention, sincere effort, intelligent direction and skillful execution to improve the research.Thank you, for our article to publishied in WJGO."
-
Jagtap SV, Jagtap SS. Evaluation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with tumor budding and lymphocytic infiltration as prognostic marker. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(11): 110798 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i11.110798]
|
|
33
|
-
"The submission process was exceptionally smooth and yielded results that exceeded our expectations. We were profoundly impressed by the publisher's outstanding editorial team and their panel of highly experienced review experts, whose professionalism and meticulous approach are truly commendable. Furthermore, it is particularly noteworthy that the entire process, from manuscript acceptance to final publication, strictly adhered to the established timeline. The remarkable execution efficiency fully demonstrated their superior project management capabilities."
-
Liu XR, Chen XZ, Fan MW, Zhang SH, Shi N, Liu CX, Chen Y, Wang XM. Endoscopic treatment for dysphagia caused by mid-esophageal diverticulum and diffuse esophageal spasm: A case report. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 17(11): 111770 [PMID: 41256297 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i11.111770]
|
|
34
|
-
"We are really happy to publish our work in the World Journal of Orthopedics. The review process was efficient and fast. The suggestions of external reviewer greatly improved the quality of our manuscript. The editing team was also efficient and great. We appreciate the timely reminder emails that were sent to us at various points. If there is any new manuscript, we will also submit it to this journal."
-
He WP, Ren CM, Luo F, Chen L, Wang WT, Qiu BT, Zhang XC, Chen HT. Bilateral sleeve fracture of the superior pole of the patella in a healthy adult: A case report. World J Orthop 2025; 16(11): 110173 [DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i11.110173]
|
|
35
|
-
"The review process was efficient, and peer review experts provided professional and constructive revisions. In order to ensure the high quality of the final published results, the author team revised the manuscript carefully and carefully for several rounds. The submission system is easy to operate, the charts after publication are high definition, and the reference format is concise and clear, which significantly improves the reading experience of readers. I would like to express my sincere thanks to the editorial department and the reviewers."
-
Zheng SW, Lin XY, Xie NS, Zhang XY, Deng F, Zou HQ, Zhan XL, Tang GY. Breastfeeding was associated with lower risks of maternal postpartum hypertension and diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(11): 111578 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i11.111578]
|
|
36
|
-
"Our experience publishing with the World Journal of Orthopedics was highly positive. The journal's dedicated language service greatly improved our manuscript's clarity and compliance. We are particularly grateful to the reviewers for their expert and insightful comments, which were pivotal in strengthening the academic rigor and depth of our work. We are delighted with the final outcome and confident in the contribution this makes to our field."
-
Huang HC, Che YF, Sun H, Xu YS, Gao HY, Tang XS. Traditional Chinese bone-setting combined with percutaneous screw fixation for comminuted calcaneal fractures: A case report and review of literature. World J Orthop 2025; 16(11): 111052 [DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i11.111052]
|
|
37
|
-
"The peer-review process was rigorous yet constructive. Both reviewers read our methodology in detail, pointed out the problem of our statistical methods and suggested a larger-scale study. The editorial team required two rounds of revision within a specific time, giving clear check-lists. Such in-depth, prompt feedback significantly improved the efficiency."
-
Jin T, Zhou YW, Sun PS, Huang Y, Gao JG, Jin X. Unraveling the characteristics of early esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma using multi-model endoscopy: A retrospective study of serial cases. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(11): 110715 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i11.110715]
|
|
38
|
-
"The publication process for the Letter to the Editor in the World Journal of Diabetes was a relatively quick and streamlined process, from the time of submission to the publication date. We are very satisfied with the quality of peer review as well as the quality of editing undertaken for this Letter to the Editor by the World Journal of Diabetes. There were no issues encountered throughout the publication process."
-
Jiang H, Henley D, Jiang FX. Potentially novel surrogate biomarker for diagnosing insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(11): 113457 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i11.113457]
|
|
39
|
-
"Re: Kanda T, Sasaki-Tanaka R, Kamimura H, Terai S. Is higher body mass index correlated with worse clinical outcomes in acute liver failure? World J Clin Cases 2025; 13(32): 113514 [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i32.113514]
It is my great pleasure to publish our article in World Journal of Clinical Cases as a Letter to the Editor of an invited article. Our article entitled "Is higher body mass index correlated with worse clinical outcomes in acute liver failure?" is comments on the article "Krishnan A, Khan S, Gips J, Alqahtani SA, Vaidya D, Liu YS, Kim A, Su A, Gurakar A, Hamilton JP, Woreta TA. Body mass index and its association with clinical outcomes in acute liver failure. World J Clin Cases. 2025;13:109212."
We also published "Kanda T, Yokosuka O, Hiraide A, Kojima H, Honda A, Fukai K, Imazeki F, Nagao K, Saisho H. Prevalence of obesity in patients with acute hepatitis; is severe obesity a risk factor for fulminant hepatitis in Japan? Hepatogastroenterology. 2005;52:180-182. " before.
Thank you.
Best,
Tatsuo Kanda, M.D."
-
Kanda T, Sasaki-Tanaka R, Kamimura H, Terai S. Is higher body mass index correlated with worse clinical outcomes in acute liver failure? World J Clin Cases 2025; 13(32): 113514 [PMID: 41256347 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i32.113514]
|
|
40
|
-
"I am thoroughly impressed with the efficiency and fairness of the publication process. The peer review process was not only helpful but also insightful, providing constructive feedback that significantly enhanced the quality of my work. The support from the editorial team was exceptional. They maintained clear and timely communication, keeping me informed of each stage in the publication process, which I greatly appreciated. This level of professionalism and dedication made the entire experience smooth and rewarding. Thank you for the substantial support and guidance throughout"
-
Kassem S, Khalaila B, Stein N, Zaina A. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists switching patterns in type two diabetes: A retrospective real-world study. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(11): 112999 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i11.112999]
|
|
41
|
-
"I think the process was smooth and efficient. I am happy to be a reviewer with your journal in the future. The time spent from acceptance to publishing was acceptable. I was able to communicate with journal and get a response within reasonable time but sometimes take longer. Otherwise, no issues!"
-
Anam E. Shoulder complications in sickle cell disease: Challenges, management strategies, and future directions. World J Orthop 2025; 16(11): 112198 [DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i11.112198]
|
|
42
|
-
"I am satisfied with the process of publishing manuscript. It is my honor to submit my manuscript to your journal， and I am grateful for editors and peer review professors giving me the revising suggestions. Then， if there is any new manuscript，I will also submit it to your journal. I am satisfied with the process of publishing manuscript. It is my honor to submit my manuscript to your journal， and I am grateful for editors and peer review professors giving me the revising suggestions. Then， if there is any new manuscript，I will also submit it to your journal."
-
Yu JH, Yu J, Yu JX, Yang LF, Yan D, Liu Y, Xian JR, Yi PS. Personalized prognosis in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Development and validation of a model for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(11): 111814 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i11.111814]
|
|
43
|
-
"Some of the article’s reviewers are particularly clear, offering targeted comments and providing solutions, while others are vague, writing comments merely to fill sentences. They also mention certain issues in the manuscript which the authors have already pointed out cannot be addressed, yet they still record them. However, there are reviewers who both make pertinent observations and propose solutions to help the authors get their article accepted. I believe it would be advisable to recommend that reviewers provide to-the-point comments and suggest practical solutions for the authors.
Furthermore, while your journal invites certain authors whose work it considers noteworthy to submit a manuscript for review—explicitly assuring them that no fees will be charged—you ultimately impose conditions at the end of the process, even after the article has been accepted, that require authors to pay money. One such example is the requirement for “necessary language improvements,” even when this is objectively unnecessary, especially in cases where the author group includes physicians who are native English citizens and the have CV with 100-400 papers in the PubMed. This should not happen, as it discourages authors from submitting their work to your journal. It makes us feel misled as an author group and suggests that our integrity is being questioned.
When your journal states that no publication fee will be required, this should apply to all aspects of the process. If the journal truly wishes to support selected submissions, it should also assume any associated costs rather than indirectly obliging the authors to pay for services that are ultimately unnecessary.
We kindly ask you to compare the final version of our manuscript—the one we originally submitted—with the version produced after the $850 payment, and examine the level of English language quality, grammar, and syntax, which was already of the highest standard.
Thank you for your understanding."
-
Tzouvala M, Zacharopoulou E, Kalafateli M, Viazis N, Psistakis A, Theodoropoulou A, Drygiannakis I, Karmiris K, Koutroubakis IE, Kevrekidou P, Soufleris K, Katsaros M, Giouleme O, Fousekis F, Katsanos K, Christodoulou D, Gaki A, Papathanasiou E, Bamias G, Zampeli E, Michopoulos S, Kyriakos N, Veretanos C, Argyriou K, Kapsoritakis A, Tribonias G, Mantzaris GJ, Liatsos C. Value of tofacitinib extended induction therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: A real-world 52-week follow-up study. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(42): 111282 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i42.111282]
|
|
44
|
-
"Most aspects of the publication process is generally satisfactory. However, I was disappointed with the online submission system, finding it overly complex and instruction-heavy, which made the process more difficult than necessary. Additionally, the article editorial process seems unnecessarily cumbersome and lengthy, which can be discouraging for authors. I hope these concerns can be addressed to improve the overall experience and make it more user-friendly for authors submitting their work.
Also worthy of note is the unnecessary word limit given to this particular comment column."
-
Sanusi KO, Asiwe JN, Sulaimon FA, Bashar F, Yusuf SK, Abdulkadir HO. Diabetic neuropathy and wound healing: An update on epigenetic crosstalk. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(11): 110428 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i11.110428]
|
|
45
|
-
"The whole process of submitting the article was seamless, and the reviewers provided highly professional feedback. These constructive comments not only helped me refine the current manuscript but also clarified key standards for academic writing rigor. I gained considerable insights throughout this submission, which will equip me with more practical experience for future manuscript submissions. It would be ideal if the publication cycle could be further shortened."
-
Wu YX, Tian R, Li XW, Guo JY, Tang JF, Zhou CF. Emerging non-invasive imaging biomarkers of Ki-67 in pancreatic cancer: Toward predictive precision oncology. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(11): 110468 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i11.110468]
|
|
46
|
-
"Thank you for the opportunity to submit our manuscript, We believe our work aligns well with the scope of your journal and will be of interest to its readership. We have ensured that the manuscript presents a clear, concise, and reproducible account of our research. We have also thoroughly reviewed the journal's formatting guidelines and believe our submission is fully compliant. We look forward to your valuable feedback and are available to make any revisions you may recommend."
-
Yao ZY, Bao G, Li GC, Hao QL, Ma LJ, Rao YX, Xu K, Ma X, Han ZX. Survival prognosis in advanced HER-2 negative gastric cancer treated with immunochemotherapy: A novel model. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2025; 17(11): 112981 [DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v17.i11.112981]
|
|
47
|
-
"I really appreciate the journal for publishing my article. From submission through peer review to publication, the process was efficient and transparent. The reviewers offered professional and constructive feedback, while the editorial team provided prompt and attentive support. I expect that this journal will continue to grow in influence, and I look forward to collaborating in the future."
-
Xiao FG, Yang Z, Yu SY, Li Q, Huang PC, Huang GB, Li XG, Ran JL, Rui SL, Deng WQ. N7-methylguanosine-related gene decapping scavenger enzymes as a novel biomarker regulating epithelial cell function in diabetic foot ulcers. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(11): 109455 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i11.109455]
|
|
48
|
-
"The author is satisfied with the evaluation process, and it has been an honor to carry out all this hard work together with WJCC. The entire process has been highly educational, motivating, and deeply appreciated, providing valuable insights and constructive guidance that will continue to enhance the quality of the manuscript moving forward."
-
Noh BG, Seo HI, Park YM, Oh MH, Song SB. Clinicopathologic differences before and after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy according to obesity. World J Clin Cases 2025; 13(32): 110391 [PMID: 41256348 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i32.110391]
|
|
49
|
-
"The review process was smooth and fast. We are really happy with the quality of external reviewer as theirs suggestions helped in improving the quality of our manuscript. The editing team was equally great . Communication was swift and clear. The proofreading and changes done were very good. We also appreciate the timely reminder emails that were sent to us at various points"
-
Agrawal A, Samanta A. Quality of life in children with chronic pancreatitis: An overlooked challenge. World J Clin Pediatr 2025; 14(4): 109615 [PMID: 41255676 DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.v14.i4.109615]
|
|
50
|
-
"The peer review process of this journal is fast, along with useful and constructive reviewer reports. It would be nice if the APC for the journal could be given further discounts based on the quality assessment of the paper by the handling editors and the reviewers (during the peer review process)."
-
Zhao ST, Zhu YM, Chen YY, Sun ZL, Qiu SH. Association between cardiorespiratory fitness and impaired vascular function in type 2 diabetes. World J Diabetes 2025; 16(11): 111472 [DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i11.111472]
|
