|
1
|
-
"We are honored to collaborate with your esteemed journal and would like to take this opportunity to express our gratitude to your editorial team.
Throughout the submission and review process, we were deeply impressed by the professionalism and efficiency of your editorial team, especially in the areas of manuscript review, communication, and revision, where they provided invaluable support and assistance. The clear feedback and meticulous guidance provided at each stage made the entire process smooth and pleasant.
At the same time, we highly value your journal's rigorous review and high-quality peer review, which not only enhanced our research level but also allowed us to think more deeply and refine the various aspects of our paper.
Overall, we are very satisfied with your service and look forward to more opportunities for collaboration in the future.
Thank you again for your efforts and support, and we wish your journal continued success in the academic field.
Sincerely,Xuanli"
-
Su XL, Xu FR, Yang J, Niu SQ, Shi HJ, He YF, Li ZH, Bagari P, Wu XW, Peng XY, Zhang HW, Wang MY. Calcifying nanoparticles induce apoptosis and calcification in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells via the transforming growth factor-β/Smad pathway. World J Stem Cells 2025; 17(12): 106128 [DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i12.106128]
|
|
2
|
-
"We sincerely appreciate the opportunity to provide feedback on the journal's peer review process.We believe the current process could be further simplified and shortened to enhance efficiency.
Streamlining some redundant procedures would not only reduce the waiting time for authors but also improve the overall
submission experience. The peer review reports have been helpful, but a more
concise and time-efficient process would better support researchers in advancing their work.We hope these suggestions can contribute to the continuous improvement of the journal's services."
-
Zhang XL, Lin AP, Lin TS, Huang YQ. Effects of early activity intervention on intestinal motility recovery in patients after colorectal cancer surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(12): 112780 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.112780]
|
|
3
|
-
"We would like to express our gratitude to the reviewers for their constructive comments on the manuscript. EBV infection is a complex issue that can lead to various clinical outcomes. This review examines the distinctions and connections between EBV-related intestinal diseases and IBD. We hope that this paper can be of assistance to clinicians and researchers."
-
Li SY, Jia J, Xu LZ, Zheng K. Relationship between Epstein-Barr virus and inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(48): 111187 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i48.111187]
|
|
4
|
-
"We are very satisfied with the editors and all the staff of the magazine. The publication speed is also very fast.The editing quality of the article is very high.The PDF layout of the article is also very appropriate.The peer review of manuscripts is very objective.Peer review has been of great help to my article."
-
Xu MJ, Wei X, Lu Y, Sun L, Xie Y, Li MH. Severe hyperlipidemia associated with drug-induced cholestatic liver disease: A case report. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(12): 111414 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i12.111414]
|
|
5
|
-
"The review cycle time is relatively appropriate, and the system is very convenient to use. The references review and reminders set up by the system are very good, avoiding academic misconduct that may occur accidentally and reflecting the high-quality service characteristics and professional level of the journal. The comments and suggestions are highly constructive. The editor is very responsible and enthusiastic in their professionalism. Overall, I am very satisfied with the publishing process."
-
Shi Y, Zhang P, Li L, Yang HM, Li ZM, Zheng J, Yang L. Interpretable model based on multisequence magnetic resonance imaging radiomics for predicting the pathological grades of hepatocellular carcinomas. World J Radiol 2025; 17(12): 112911 [DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i12.112911]
|
|
6
|
-
"World Journal of Cardiology provided a very positive experience for my manuscript submission. The online system was straightforward to use, the author guidelines were clear, and the editorial office was responsive and professional throughout the process. The initial review timeline was reasonable, and I felt the journal treated the work seriously and respectfully. Overall, I found WJC to be a well-organized journal with a smooth submission process and supportive editorial handling."
-
Mercola J. Pentadecanoic acid (C15:0) and cardiovascular disease: A narrative review. World J Cardiol 2025; 17(12): 110861 [DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i12.110861]
|
|
7
|
-
"Overall, the journal demonstrates a professional and transparent editorial process. The online submission system was efficient, peer review was timely and fair, and reviewer comments were constructive. Editing quality, figures, tables, and final PDFs met high academic standards. The publication timeline and adherence to ethical and academic norms were satisfactory."
-
Zohery M, Jahangir S, Jenna HC, Sarfraz S, Ali H, Raza M, Rafiq T, Dahiya DS, Jahagirdar V, Ali H. Thrombotic risk in hepatitis C: Interplay between hepatic dysfunction, viral-driven inflammation, and cardiovascular consequences. World J Virol 2025; 14(4): 113217 [DOI: 10.5501/wjv.v14.i4.113217]
|
|
8
|
-
"The peer review comments were fair, objective, and helpful in improving the manuscript. The submission and publication process was well organized, and communication with the editorial office was clear and timely throughout. We appreciate the professional efforts of the reviewers and editors in facilitating a smooth publication process from submission to publication."
-
Bhullar JS, Busbait SA, Herman K, Chitragari G, Singh JP, Drelichman ER. Timing of diverting loop ileostomy closure after rectal resection: Commentary on recent findings. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(12): 114274 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.114274]
|
|
9
|
-
"We would like to commend the editorial office and reviewers for their exceptional efficiency and the high quality of their responses throughout the peer-review and production stages. The feedback was always constructive and timely. Furthermore, the F6Publishing platform proved to be highly practical and didactic, greatly facilitating the submission and revision process. It was a positive and smooth experience."
-
Lucas IC, Domingues AL, Filgueira NA, Lopes EP, Albuquerque IKP, Pereira CLD. Minimal hepatic encephalopathy in hepatosplenic schistosomiasis: High prevalence and association with portosystemic shunts in a Brazilian cross-sectional study. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(12): 113078 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i12.113078]
|
|
10
|
-
"The peer-review process was conducted objectively and efficiently, with constructive comments that helped improve the quality of the manuscript. Editorial communication was clear and timely, and responses to queries were prompt. The editing and production services were professional, well organized, and completed within a reasonable timeframe, contributing to a smooth publication process."
-
Bouayad A. Harnessing early enzymatic biomarkers and cytokines for risk prediction in post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(48): 114786 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i48.114786]
|
|
11
|
-
"Regarding the review process, the review performed by two reviewers was fair, objective, and very useful. They enhance the scientific quality of the paper. However, the review conducted by one reviewer had vey low scientific quality. He/she did not understand the paper and his/her comments were not valuable. After the review process. the time “in press” was a bit longer than expected."
-
Adeva-Andany MM. Beneficial effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on kidney function can be just a mirage. World J Nephrol 2025; 14(4): 110990 [DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i4.110990]
|
|
12
|
-
"We are highly satisfied with the peer review process, which was conducted in a timely, transparent, and professional manner. The reviewers offered constructive and insightful feedback that enhanced the quality of our work. Overall, the experience reflected fairness, efficiency, and integrity. This evaluation serves as a valuable reference for future submissions and collaborations."
-
Elahi T, Ahmed S, Mubarak M. Prognostic value of the MEST-C score in long-term outcomes of immunoglobulin A nephropathy patients: Insights from a developing country. World J Nephrol 2025; 14(4): 112082 [DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i4.112082]
|
|
13
|
-
"The overall process of evaluation, production, and publication of manuscript was timely and smooth. Each step of Manuscript handling was informed to the authors for ensuring no delay in resubmission of comments. All editors involved with responsibility to expedite the manuscript process.
Thanks and regards.
Dr Adarsh Kumar
Associate Professor
Nephrology, VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital"
-
Rajput M, Bachani S, Suri J, Bharti R, Kumar A, Kumar R, Verma H, Prasad P. Acute kidney injury associated with acute fatty liver of pregnancy: An update on a rare clinical entity. World J Nephrol 2025; 14(4): 110414 [DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i4.110414]
|
|
14
|
-
"I would like to Thank you very much for the effort put in providing a good peer review for Our manuscript.
As the only comment, I firmly believe that English editing made by an external society should not be mandatory, as this practice could discourage many Authors from submitting a manuscript to Your Journals."
-
Posa A, Lippi M, Barbieri P, Andreani EV, Iezzi R. Performance of artificial intelligence in predicting hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after thermal ablation: A systematic review. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(12): 111425 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i12.111425]
|
|
15
|
-
"I am satisfied with the overall publication process, which was smooth, efficient, and well organized. The submission system was user-friendly, the peer-review process was timely and transparent, and communication from the editorial office was clear and professional throughout. I did not encounter any significant issues at any stage of submission, review, revision, or final decision."
-
Singh A, Bhardwaj A, Kaur H, Bawa A, Midha V, Sood A. Drug-induced liver injury in inflammatory bowel disease: Challenges in diagnosis and monitoring. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(12): 114084 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i12.114084]
|
|
16
|
-
"Overall good experience in publishing with the world journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology. Slightly prolonged publishing process but reviewer comments were valuable and made important addition to our manuscript. copyediting was professional with high quality visuals. Importantly open access to allow for the ease of access to knowledge. Maybe in the future to increase the educational value add - for each article - a CME MCQ question with a knowledge point from the article"
-
Abdulrasak M, Wernehov I, Holmgren J. Chronic mesenteric ischemia diagnosed via incidental CT findings with gastroenterologist perspective: Two case reports. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2025; 16(4): 112822 [DOI: 10.4291/wjgp.v16.i4.112822]
|
|
17
|
-
"Review took a long time and at times did not follow a conventional pathway. Even after the paper was accepted we needed to make further changes to the paper. However, the comments provided in our opinion helped to improve the paper. We are also happy with the final PDF version of the paper and glad to see that it is finally in press. Please pass on our thanks to the reviewers and editorial staff"
-
Economos H, MacIsaac RJ. Cardio-kidney-metabolic protective effects of semaglutide across the spectrum of chronic kidney disease. World J Nephrol 2025; 14(4): 109457 [DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i4.109457]
|
|
18
|
-
"Overall procedure from submission to publication was highly satisfactory and user friendly.
Submission platform: highly satisfactory, user friendly
Peer review: constructive, help to improve the quality of manuscript
Proof reading : allow in two stages
Quality of published version: highly satisfactory
Core tip: good inclusion
All details was indicated clearly in the system
Time taken to publish from submission : Satisfactory"
-
Fernando TN, Dayananda D, Muthugala R. Human bocavirus: As an emerging respiratory pathogen. World J Virol 2025; 14(4): 115043 [DOI: 10.5501/wjv.v14.i4.115043]
|
|
19
|
-
"When an author is invited for submitting an editorial, its a privilege for both the author as well as the journal. Hence, as a dictum or standing rule, the invited Editorials should be processed in a way that they only undergo changes or corrections, but cannot be rejected (except in rare instances)."
-
Govindarajan KK. Obesity and pediatric renal transplant: An unholy alliance. World J Nephrol 2025; 14(4): 106428 [DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i4.106428]
|
|
20
|
-
"Overall procedure from submission to publication was highly satisfactory and user friendly.
Submission platform: highly satisfactory, user friendly
Peer review: constructive, help to improve the quality of manuscript
Proof reading : allow in two stages
Quality of published version: highly satisfactory
Core tip: good inclusion
All details was indicated clearly in the system
Time taken to publish from submission : Satisfactory"
-
Perera I, Weerathunga A, Arachchige N, Rajamanthri L, Fernando S, Muthugala R. Detection of dengue virus encephalitis in central part of Sri Lanka. World J Virol 2025; 14(4): 115071 [DOI: 10.5501/wjv.v14.i4.115071]
|
|
21
|
-
"Overall, the experience of publishing our manuscript in the World Journal of Gastroenterology has been highly satisfactory and efficient. Throughout the entire process—from submission, revision, to final acceptance—the editorial team maintained timely and clear communication, promptly addressing queries and providing updates. The F6Publishing online system proved user‑friendly and intuitive, making it straightforward to upload files, track progress, and submit revisions.
What stood out in particular was the excellent work of the scientific editors, whose careful attention to manuscript formatting, stylistic consistency, and presentation details significantly enhanced the clarity and professionalism of the final published version. Their contributions truly added value to the article.
We would certainly consider publishing with this journal again in the future and recommend it to colleagues in the field."
-
Wang Y, Ma GH, Qu MY, Xu QS, Huang HX. Serum uric acid-to-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and cardiovascular risk in Asian patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(48): 112972 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i48.112972]
|
|
22
|
-
"We are honored to have had the opportunity to publish our commentary in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. It is a privilege to contribute to this esteemed forum, which serves the global community of clinicians and researchers dedicated to advancing our field.
The chosen topic addressed a pertinent development in the dynamic landscape of gastrointestinal surgery. In our piece, we aimed to synthesize contemporary evidence and provide a focused perspective, hoping to stimulate further scholarly discussion and critical thought. The ongoing evolution in surgical techniques, perioperative care, and personalized treatment strategies continues to redefine patient care, making such discourse essential.
We extend our sincere gratitude to the Editors for their consideration and to the journal for providing a platform dedicated to disseminating high-quality insights. We believe that shared knowledge and constructive dialogue, as facilitated by journals of this caliber, are fundamental to progress in surgical science and improved patient outcomes worldwide."
-
Li WJ, Mi N, Huang X, Liu CS, Zhang ST, Liao Y, Yu Y. Predicting unplanned extubation risk in patients with endoscopic nasobiliary drainage. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(12): 112175 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.112175]
|
|
23
|
-
"The process of publication is clear. This is a good point. However, e-mails from editorial office were sometime delayed or missing. This is a problem to procced with submitting revised manuscript. Moreover, the time between acceptance and publication is too long. Free of charge for Invited review is helpful for researchers."
-
Komatsu H. Comparison of three pediatric studies investigating acute hepatitis of unknown etiology. World J Virol 2025; 14(4): 110435 [DOI: 10.5501/wjv.v14.i4.110435]
|
|
24
|
-
"The process of publication is clear. This is a good point. However, e-mails from editorial office were sometime delayed or missing. This is a problem to procced with submitting revised manuscript. Moreover, the time between acceptance and publication is too long. Free of charge for Invited review is helpful for researchers."
-
Komatsu H. Hepatitis B virus: Where do we stand and what is the next step for eradication? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(27): 8998-9016 [PMID: 25083074 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i27.8998]
|
|
25
|
-
"We are delighted with the acceptance of our manuscript. Sincere thanks to you and the editorial team for your efforts. We will cooperate fully with subsequent publication requirements.
Your professional guidance and the constructive comments from the reviewers have been invaluable in enhancing the quality and clarity of our work. We have carefully addressed all the suggestions raised during the review stage, which have significantly improved the academic rigor and readability of the manuscript. Without your dedicated efforts, the refinement of this work would not have been possible.
We also appreciate the timely communication and smooth coordination from the editorial office, which has made the submission and revision process streamlined and efficient.
Once again, we express our deepest thanks to you and the entire editorial team for your hard work and support."
-
Zhang X, Liao MJ, Ren LY, Qin WY, Mu SW, She SP, Fei R, Cong X, Zhou YP, Chen DB, Chen HS. AADN score: Predicting response to transarterial chemoembolization, sintilimab and lenvatinib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(48): 113856 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i48.113856]
|
|
26
|
-
"The table in this manuscript contains many indicators that require up and down arrows to indicate changes, but the journal requires that no special characters appear in the table, which is confusing. This leads to the need for more textual descriptions to express the tables in the manuscript, which can affect the reader's reading experience. I think this requirement is unreasonable. In addition, the peer review and publishing process is satisfactory."
-
Sun SP, Mao YQ, Fan YH, Lv B. Exploring exercise modalities and their impact on inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review of rodent colitis models. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(48): 113243 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i48.113243]
|
|
27
|
-
"The overall editorial and publication process of the World Journal of Gastroenterology was professional, transparent, and efficient. The online submission system was user-friendly and well structured. The peer review process was rigorous, objective, and constructive, providing valuable comments that significantly improved the quality and clarity of our manuscript. The editorial and language editing were meticulous, and the final published version accurately reflected the scientific content of our work. We appreciate the professionalism and dedication of the editorial team and reviewers, and we are satisfied with the overall publishing experience."
-
Wang CL, Zeng M, Luo Y. Unmasking the high-risk phenotype in autoimmune gastritis: A pathologist’s roadmap for the clinician. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(48): 115244 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i48.115244]
|
|
28
|
-
"The journal provides excellent, efficient, and author-friendly publication services. The overall editorial workflow is well organized, timely, and reflects a strong commitment to maintaining high academic standards. I particularly appreciate the transparency of the peer-review process, including the practice of sharing reviewer reports directly with authors prior to the final editorial decision. This approach allows authors to better understand the evaluative process, facilitates timely and focused revisions, and promotes constructive scientific dialogue. Such professionalism and openness significantly enhance the quality of submissions and reinforce the journal’s credibility and trust within the research community."
-
Choudhery MS, Niaz A, Arif T, Mahmood R. Adipose tissue as a living drug: Stromal vascular fraction and adipose tissue-derived stem cells in regenerative medicine. World J Stem Cells 2025; 17(12): 114170 [DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i12.114170]
|
|
29
|
-
"The entire editorial process is well organised, fast and author friendly and it provide a smooth exceptional experience to authors. Quality of review is also of very high standards which greatly enhance the quality of manuscript even if not accepted for publication. Various timeline and email really help authors in tracking the progress of accepted manuscript."
-
Singh D, Sangha SS, Yadav RK, Subbiah AK, Yadav S, Kumar A, Khadgawat R, Chaturvedi PK, Agarwal SK, Mahajan S, Pahuja T, Bhowmik D. Relationship between vitamin D and post-transplant diabetes mellitus in kidney transplant recipients. World J Nephrol 2025; 14(4): 113300 [DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i4.113300]
|
|
30
|
-
"I sincerely appreciate the efforts by the entire team of the World Journal of Hepatology journal, including the Editorial office and the reviewers. We got all the help needed during this process of peer review. The first review and the re-reviews have been extremely helpful to improve our manuscript. Thank you."
-
Ghosh D, Kumar A. Ultrasound imaging in orthotopic hepatocellular carcinoma models: Promise, practicality, and points for refinement. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(12): 115551 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i12.115551]
|
|
31
|
-
"This manuscript benefited from a highly professional editorial process with organized, timely, and clear communication, along with an expert peer review providing detailed and insightful constructive remarks that were of great scientific value and have significantly enhanced the clarity of the concept, methodological rigor, and overall impact of the work."
-
Kelleni MT, Abdelzaher WY, Adly M, Attya ME, Fawzy MA, Ibrahim MA. Targeting sirtuin 1/nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2/tumor necrosis factor-α pathway to modulate hepatic ischemia reperfusion-induced injury. World J Hepatol 2025; 17(12): 110733 [DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v17.i12.110733]
|
|
32
|
-
"The journal editors have guided a rigorous and extensive peer review process for this article, with several independent expert reviewers providing careful and in-depth evaluations. The reviewers’ numerous, high-quality comments were highly constructive and helped refine the methodology, sharpen the discussion, and enhance the overall impact of the manuscript. The editorial handling was highly efficient and professional, and the overall process improved the clarity, scientific quality, and clinical relevance of the article."
-
Kelleni MT. First use of nitazoxanide in Kelleni’s protocol for managing severe bronchiolitis in a 9-month-old infant: A case report and review of literature. World J Clin Cases 2025; 13(36): 113655 [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i36.113655]
|
|
33
|
-
"An excellent process from submission to publication of article. The paper received a very fast processing from the submission to the peer review. The final version of the paper is exactly as the authors wished. We believe that the journal should be considered carefully from all researchers, and especially, for radioanatomical study for potential submissions. We are really pleased that our study was published to World Journal of Radiology."
-
Triantafyllou G, Papadopoulos-Manolarakis P, Arkoudis NA, Moschovaki-Zeiger O, Velonakis G, Piagkou M. Magnetic resonance imaging-based classification of trigeminal nerve-superior cerebellar artery relationships. World J Radiol 2025; 17(12): 116453 [DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i12.116453]
|
|
34
|
-
"It is always a pleasure to work together with the BPG, and I am excited for further publications in the future. Relative to other journals, the process from submission to publication is fast most of the time. Peer review reports are usually helpful and constructive. Keep up the excellent work."
-
Arkoudis NA, Siderakis M, Tsetsou I, Efthymiou E, Triantafyllou G, Chalmoukis D, Karachaliou A, Papadopoulos A, Prountzos S, Moschovaki-Zeiger O, Gouliopoulos N, Papakonstantinou O, Filippiadis D, Velonakis G. Developmental venous anomalies and cerebral cavernous malformations: Partners in crime. World J Radiol 2025; 17(12): 114595 [DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v17.i12.114595]
|
|
35
|
-
"The submission process went smoothly. I am grateful to the editor and the reviewers for their assistance. During the submission process, through communication with the editor and the reviewers, I learned a lot of knowledge. I also gained a lot of insights into the writing of the article, the creation of tables and figures, etc. This will be of great help for future research. I hope there will be more cooperation in the future."
-
Cai B, Qiao ML, Miao D, Liu GZ. Cardiac myxoma and its implications for cardioembolic stroke. World J Cardiol 2025; 17(12): 112396 [DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i12.112396]
|
|
36
|
-
"All comments and suggestions provided by the reviewers and the editorial team have been carefully considered. In response to their constructive feedback, we have revised the manuscript and made the necessary corrections and improvements. Particular attention has been given to the methodology, discussion, and overall clarity of presentation. We believe that this revision process has significantly enhanced the scientific contribution and quality of the paper. We sincerely thank the reviewers and editors for their valuable time and insightful comments."
-
Öndeş B, Gökdere OG, Kanat BH. Effect of resected gastric volume on weight loss after sleeve gastrectomy: A retrospective clinical study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(12): 113571 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.113571]
|
|
37
|
-
"We would like to share some constructive feedback regarding our experience with the editorial process.
On this occasion, the process was efficient and relatively fast, which we truly appreciate. However, in previous submissions we have experienced considerably longer response times, which can be challenging for authors, particularly when revisions are time-sensitive.
Another aspect we have noticed, both in this journal and within the same editorial group, is that minor revision requests are sometimes communicated in multiple rounds. It might be helpful to consolidate all minor comments into a single revision round whenever possible, as this would streamline the process and reduce repeated back-and-forth communications.
Finally, we observed that several formal and administrative requirements are requested during the review and revision stages. While we fully understand their importance, some of these requirements might be more efficiently requested after a manuscript has been formally accepted, rather than during the peer-review process.
We share these comments in a constructive spirit, with the aim of contributing to an even more efficient and author-friendly editorial workflow."
-
Ramos-Gregorio CO, Tremillo-Maldonado O, Silveira F, Schuch LF, Pereira-Prado V, Sicco E, Soto-Najera AC, GómezPalacio-Gastélum M, Isiordia-Espinoza M, Muñoz-Ibarra JJ, Toral-Rizo V, Bologna-Molina R. Multifocal epithelial hyperplasia: Clinical features, diagnosis and management challenges. World J Exp Med 2025; 15(4): 114368 [DOI: 10.5493/wjem.v15.i4.114368]
|
|
38
|
-
"We appreciate the opportunity to submit our work to F6 Publishing. The process was overall easy to manage, but the submission page had a few glitches without well-explained error messages. We also waited several months from article acceptance to article publication. However, the peer review comments were valuable for improving our final manuscript."
-
Hutchinson HJ, Gonzalez M, Feier D, Welch CE, Lucke-Wold B. Colorectal cancer metastasis to the brain: A scoping review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2025; 16(4): 110961 [DOI: 10.4291/wjgp.v16.i4.110961]
|
|
39
|
-
"As the corresponding author of this manuscript, I would like to express my high level of satisfaction with the entire submission and publication process. The editorial team demonstrated rigor, efficiency, and professionalism throughout all stages of manuscript handling:
The online submission system was user-friendly and well-structured, with timely updates on manuscript status, greatly facilitating progress tracking.
The peer review process was not only reasonably timed but also provided detailed and constructive feedback. The reviewers offered valuable suggestions regarding study design, data interpretation, and academic expression, which substantially enhanced the scholarly quality and logical coherence of the paper.
The editing and production quality was commendable, with professional language polishing, clear formatting of figures and tables, and final PDF and online versions that fully met academic publishing standards.
The publication workflow was transparent and well-organized, with a reasonable timeframe from acceptance to online publication, aligning with the timeliness required for academic dissemination.
The journal’s academic norms and ethical guidelines were clearly communicated, and the editorial office proactively provided relevant guidelines and conducted plagiarism checks, reflecting the journal’s strong commitment to academic integrity.
Overall, the journal excels in academic services, publication quality, and author support, demonstrating a strong academic reputation and professional standards. I would gladly recommend this journal to my peers and look forward to future collaborations."
-
Ma HY, Chen YW, Liu X, Zhang MM, Tan BB. Modified Pingwei Baohe decoction improves postoperative recovery in gastric cancer patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(12): 113364 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.113364]
|
|
40
|
-
"It has been such a pleasant experience submitting our work to your journal. The reviewers provided insightful suggestions that truly enhanced the quality of the manuscript. Your editorial team's dedication and efficiency are truly commendable. We are already looking forward to the opportunity of contributing to your esteemed journal again in the future."
-
Gong L, Yu J, Lv ZB, Qin XZ, Li M, Guo W, Huang B, Tian YH. Reducing anastomotic complications with endoscopy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(12): 114079 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.114079]
|
|
41
|
-
"We sincerely thank the reviewers for their insightful comments and the editor for effectively facilitating the review process. The constructive feedback significantly enhanced the quality of our manuscript. While we appreciate the academic rigor, we believe the overall publication period could be shorter to ensure more timely dissemination. We are grateful for the editorial team's support and the professional handling of our submission throughout this period."
-
Katsaros I, Papadakos SP, Despotidis M, Koutsoumpas A, Schizas D. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure as a first-line treatment for post-esophagectomy anastomotic leaks: A paradigm shift in management. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(12): 113305 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.113305]
|
|
42
|
-
"I am happy to provide the author’s comments for our submission to World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology.
The process of submission is efficient. The authors feel well supported.
The peer review was very helpful.
Overall, the experience from submission to publication was good.
I am thankful to the journal editing and production team."
-
Dutta AK, Vishruth S, Kovi SL, Dadhich P, Polavarapu J, Abraham D. Gut microbiota as a potential predictor of therapeutic response in adults with Crohn’s disease: A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2025; 16(4): 112961 [DOI: 10.4291/wjgp.v16.i4.112961]
|
|
43
|
-
"I have no extra comments or suggestions regarding the peer-review report, the second decision report of the editorial boards, and the review comments of the track the quality and reader’s comments of your article after publication. I feel good on the whole process of editing and publishing.
Thank you for the invitation for this manuscipt, and for waiveing the publication costs for this Letter to the Editor."
-
Jing C, Liu K. Taming colonic anastomotic leakage: Wisdom from the ancient Chinese legend of Yu the Great. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(12): 113423 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.113423]
|
|
44
|
-
"I would like to express my satisfaction with the overall review and evaluation process of our paper, which was conducted professionally and transparently. My only minor observation is that the publication process took somewhat longer than than I expected (the article was fully accepted on September 15, 2025, but not published until December 27, 2025). However, this is more of a remark than a complaint, as I understand the operational challenges that journals sometimes face. I wish to emphasize that I have no serious concerns regarding the quality or handling of the submission process. Thank you to the journal and the reviewers for their time and effort devoted to our work.
Sincerely,
Enver Zerem,
Corresponding Author"
-
Zerem E, Jovanovic P, Kunosic S, Kurtcehajic A, Zerem D, Zerem O. Optimal timing of pyogenic liver abscess evacuation: The role of early ultrasound-guided intervention. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(12): 110644 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.110644]
|
|
45
|
-
"I am delighted to share that my paper, Very early recurrence after pancreatic cancer resection: Unmasking the "biological R2" enigma and rethinking prognostic paradigms, has been officially published in the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.
First and foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor for their invaluable guidance, rigorous academic insights, and constant encouragement throughout the research and writing process. Their mentorship was pivotal to the completion of this work.
I am also deeply thankful to my co-authors for their dedicated collaboration, as well as to all the research team members who contributed to data collection, experiments, and discussions. This achievement would not have been possible without our joint efforts.
My appreciation also goes to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and thoughtful suggestions, which greatly enhanced the quality and rigor of the paper. I would like to extend my thanks to the editorial team of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery for their professionalism, efficiency, and patience during the peer-review and publication process.
Finally, I am grateful to the funding agencies and institutions that supported this research, as well as to my family and friends for their unwavering support and understanding.
I hope this paper can make a modest contribution to the advancement of pancreatic cancer treatment, and I look forward to further academic exchanges and collaborations with colleagues in the field."
-
Wan P, Zhou SQ, Ke QH. Very early recurrence after pancreatic cancer resection: Unmasking the "biological R2" enigma and rethinking prognostic paradigms. World J Gastrointest Surg 2025; 17(12): 114403 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i12.114403]
|
|
46
|
-
"Author’s Comments*: The figure submission process was unnecessarily cumbersome and time-consuming. We hope the journal could streamline the workflow and adopt a more author-friendly policy that prioritizes scientific clarity over rigid format requirements. Specifically, if figures meet clear, objective standards for readability and resolution, authors should be able to submit them in a wider range of common formats without extensive reformatting or repeated technical checks. This would improve submission efficiency and reduce administrative burden while maintaining the quality of published visuals."
-
Li H, Li ZP, Zhu MT, Lan CH, Wang YX, Liao P, Chen Z, Wang P, Sun JK, Shi Z, Lu PY, Lou C, Xu GH. Optimizing mesenchymal stem cell therapy for tendon-bone healing: Multifaceted approaches and future directions. World J Stem Cells 2025; 17(12): 114076 [DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i12.114076]
|
|
47
|
-
"Word Journal of Cardiovascular is a specialized academic journal focused on the field of cardiovascular medicine. It primarily publishes high-quality original research, review articles, and case reports, aiming to advance scholarly exchange and clinical practice in this discipline. The journal is typically overseen by an editorial board comprising recognized experts, and it maintains a rigorous peer-review process to ensure the academic validity and reliability of its published content."
-
Wang LF, Zhu HJ, Wang C, Yan F, Qu CZ. Logistic regression-based risk prediction of aortic adverse remodeling following thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with aortic dissection. World J Cardiol 2025; 17(12): 112978 [DOI: 10.4330/wjc.v17.i12.112978]
|
|
48
|
-
"We sincerely thank the editorial team for their efficient and constructive handling of our manuscript. The reviewers' comments were insightful, and the editorial team's clear communication was invaluable in strengthening the final paper. We are grateful for the professionalism and support throughout the entire publication process. We are mitivated to publish more in this journal."
-
Mulate ST, Gesese BD, Nur AM, Mengistu HB, Annose RT, Berga AE, Ulfata AL. Hepatic fascioliasis of emphasizing diagnostic difficulty and the need for high index of suspicion: Four case reports. World J Clin Cases 2025; 13(36): 113778 [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i36.113778]
|
|
49
|
-
"Thank you very much to the editorial team for the smooth workflow throughout the publication process. The peer reviewers’ comments were valuable and helped improve the manuscript. One possible area for improvement would be avoiding repeated requests for an English Language Certificate after clarification that all authors are native English speakers."
-
Kim Y, See KC. Constipation in critically ill adults. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2025; 16(4): 112019 [DOI: 10.4291/wjgp.v16.i4.112019]
|
|
50
|
-
"The authors of this manuscript were highly satisfied with their publication experience at the World Journal of Nephrology. Throughout the submission, peer-review, and editorial processes, communication was professional, timely, and constructive, contributing meaningfully to the quality of the final manuscript. We sincerely appreciate the rigour and transparency of the editorial handling and the valuable feedback provided by the reviewers. We look forward to future opportunities for collaboration with the journal and would be pleased to consider the World Journal of Nephrology for our forthcoming work."
-
Haddiya I, Simanjuntak GDFI, Ramdani S. Updates in the management of intradialytic hypotension: Emerging strategies and innovations. World J Nephrol 2025; 14(4): 109168 [DOI: 10.5527/wjn.v14.i4.109168]
|
