BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Featured Articles
8/5/2025 9:52:55 AM | Browse: 219 | Download: 795
 |
Received |
|
2025-05-28 03:59 |
 |
Peer-Review Started |
|
2025-05-28 03:59 |
 |
First Decision by Editorial Office Director |
|
2025-06-05 10:19 |
 |
Return for Revision |
|
2025-06-05 10:19 |
 |
Revised |
|
2025-06-13 15:39 |
 |
Publication Fee Transferred |
|
2025-06-20 11:23 |
 |
Second Decision by Editor |
|
2025-07-08 02:41 |
 |
Second Decision by Editor-in-Chief |
|
|
 |
Final Decision by Editorial Office Director |
|
2025-07-08 03:11 |
 |
Articles in Press |
|
2025-07-08 03:11 |
 |
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor |
|
|
 |
Typeset the Manuscript |
|
2025-07-27 14:54 |
 |
Publish the Manuscript Online |
|
2025-08-05 08:25 |
| ISSN |
1007-9327 (print) and 2219-2840 (online) |
| Open Access |
This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
| Copyright |
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. |
| Article Reprints |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
|
| Permissions |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
|
| Publisher |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA |
| Website |
http://www.wjgnet.com |
| Category |
Gastroenterology & Hepatology |
| Manuscript Type |
Retrospective Study |
| Article Title |
Long-term efficacy and short-term outcomes of intersphincteric resection vs abdominoperineal resection in patients with ultra-low rectal cancer
|
| Manuscript Source |
Unsolicited Manuscript |
| All Author List |
Guan-Cong Wang, Jun-Xing Chen, Hong-Feng Pan, Kai Ye, Yin-Cong Guo and Ying Huang |
| Funding Agency and Grant Number |
| Funding Agency |
Grant Number |
| Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province |
2023J011819 |
|
| Corresponding Author |
Yin-Cong Guo, Chief Physician, Professor, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, 59
Shengli West Road, Zhangzhou 363000, Fujian Province, China. fjzzgyc@126.com |
| Key Words |
Intersphincteric resection; Abdominoperineal resection; Ultra-low rectal cancer; Propensity score matching; Surgical outcomes |
| Core Tip |
Methodological rigor: As the largest propensity score-matched study comparing intersphincteric resection (ISR) and abdominoperineal resection (APR), we minimized selection bias by balancing 13 covariates across 803 patients (289 matched pairs). Survival advantage: ISR demonstrated a 6.7% absolute improvement in 5-year overall survival (80.8% vs 74.1%, HR = 0.554, P = 0.004) and reduced local recurrence (9.5% vs 12.9%, P = 0.019), establishing its oncologic superiority. Clinical implications: Despite higher anastomotic leakage rates (11.4% vs 1.0%), ISR significantly reduced total complications (29.4% vs 42.2%, P = 0.001) and hospitalization duration (9.8 days vs 12.9 days, P < 0.001), supporting its role as the preferred sphincter-preserving alternative to APR. |
| Publish Date |
2025-08-05 08:25 |
| Citation |
Wang GC, Chen JX, Pan HF, Ye K, Guo YC, Huang Y. Long-term efficacy and short-term outcomes of intersphincteric resection vs abdominoperineal resection in patients with ultra-low rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(29): 110004 |
| URL |
https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i29/110004.htm |
| DOI |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i29.110004 |
All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.