Publication Name	World Journal of Gastroenterology
Manuscript ID	78694
Country	China

Received	2022-07-30 08:54
Peer-Review Started	2022-07-30 08:57
First Decision by Editorial Office Director	2022-09-02 20:58
Return for Revision	2022-09-02 20:58
Revised	2022-09-14 20:25
Publication Fee Transferred
Second Decision by Editor	2022-10-19 03:50
Second Decision by Editor-in-Chief
Final Decision by Editorial Office Director	2022-10-19 16:29
Articles in Press	2022-10-19 16:29
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor	2022-11-10 13:02
Typeset the Manuscript	2022-11-29 06:59
Publish the Manuscript Online	2022-12-02 09:49

ISSN	1007-9327 (print) and 2219-2840 (online)
Open Access	This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright	©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Article Reprints	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com

Category	Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Manuscript Type	Randomized Clinical Trial
Article Title	Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10–20 mm
Manuscript Source	Unsolicited Manuscript
All Author List	Xue-Qun Zhang, Jian-Zhong Sang, Lei Xu, Xin-Li Mao, Bo Li, Wan-Lin Zhu, Xiao-Yun Yang and Chao-Hui Yu
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author	Chao-Hui Yu, MD, PhD, Chief Doctor, Professor, Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, No. 79 Qingchun Road , Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China. zyyyych@zju.edu.cn
Key Words	Colorectal polyps; Medium size; Polypectomy; Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential precutting; Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection
Core Tip	The optimal method for removal of sessile colorectal lesions sized 10-20 mm remains uncertain. Piecemeal and incomplete resection are major limitations of conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) in removing sessile colorectal polyps. In this study, we found that endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential precutting achieved better en bloc resection (94.3% vs 86.0%; P = 0.041) and with no increase in adverse events. It can serve as an alternative technique to CEMR in removal of sessile colorectal lesions sized 10 mm-20 mm.
Publish Date	2022-12-02 09:49
Citation	Zhang XQ, Sang JZ, Xu L, Mao XL, Li B, Zhu WL, Yang XY, Yu CH. Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10–20 mm. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(45): 6397-6409
URL	https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i45/6397.htm
DOI	https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6397

Full Article (PDF)	WJG-28-6397.pdf
Full Article (Word)	WJG-28-6397.docx