Publication Name	World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Manuscript ID	94889
Country	China

Received	2024-03-28 09:35
Peer-Review Started	2024-03-28 09:35
To Make the First Decision
Return for Revision	2024-08-28 04:25
Revised	2024-09-05 02:28
Second Decision	2024-09-14 02:40
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief	2024-09-14 07:21
Articles in Press	2024-09-14 07:21
Publication Fee Transferred	2024-09-14 10:09
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor	2024-09-18 08:59
Typeset the Manuscript	2024-09-29 07:18
Publish the Manuscript Online	2024-11-27 09:42

ISSN	1948-9366 (online)
Open Access	This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright	We aimed to compare the outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER) and laparoscopic resection (LR) for 2-5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors, with the ultimate goal of informing the development of standardized treatment strategies. Propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias. Notably, ER was associated with reduced postoperative pain and accelerated recovery, positioning it as a favorable option in cases where cosmetic outcomes or organ function preservation are paramount. Conversely, LR demonstrated a superior rate of complete resection, making it the preferred approach for larger tumors.
Article Reprints	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com

Category	Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Manuscript Type	Retrospective Study
Article Title	Comparison of endoscopic and laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A propensity score-matched study
Manuscript Source	Unsolicited Manuscript
All Author List	Bin-Bin Gu, Yan-Di Lu, Jin-Shun Zhang, Zhen-Zhen Wang, Xin-Li Mao and Ling-Ling Yan
Funding Agency and Grant Number	Funding Agency Grant Number The Medical Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province, China No. 2024KY1792 The Program of Taizhou Science and Technology Grant, China No. 22ywb08 The Health Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province, China No. 22PY101 The Program of Taizhou Science and Technology Grant, China No. 22ywb09 The Scientific Research Fund Program of Enze Medical Center, China No. 22EZB12 The Scientific Research Fund Program of Enze Medical Center No. 22EZC17 The Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Key Laboratory of Minimally Invasive Techniques and Rapid Rehabilitation of Digestive System Tumor of Zhejiang Province, China No. 21SZDSYS15
Corresponding Author	Ling-Ling Yan, MM, Department of Gastroenterology, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, No. 150 Xinmen Street, Linhai 317000, Zhejiang Province, China. yanlingling1992@126.com
Key Words	Gastrointestinal stromal tumor; Endoscopic resection; Laparoscopic resection; Propensity score matching; Prognosis; Complete resection
Core Tip	We aimed to compare the outcomes of endoscopic resection (ER) and laparoscopic resection (LR) for 2-5 cm gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors, with the ultimate goal of informing the development of standardized treatment strategies. Propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias. Notably, ER was associated with reduced postoperative pain and accelerated recovery, positioning it as a favorable option in cases where cosmetic outcomes or organ function preservation are paramount. Conversely, LR demonstrated a superior rate of complete resection, making it the preferred approach for larger tumors.
Publish Date	2024-11-27 09:42
Citation	<p>Gu BB, Lu YD, Zhang JS, Wang ZZ, Mao XL, Yan LL. Comparison of endoscopic and laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A propensity score-matched study. <i>World J Gastrointest Surg</i> 2024; 16(12): 3694-3702</p>
URL	https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v16/i12/3694.htm
DOI	https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i12.3694

Full Article (PDF)	WJGS-16-3694-with-cover.pdf
Manuscript File	94889_Auto_Edited_032239.docx
Answering Reviewers	94889-answering-reviewers.pdf
Audio Core Tip	94889-audio.mp3
Biostatistics Review Certificate	94889-biostatistics-statement.pdf
Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure Form	94889-conflict-of-interest-statement.pdf
Copyright License Agreement	94889-copyright-assignment.pdf
Approved Grant Application Form(s) or Funding Agency Copy of any Approval Document(s)	94889-foundation-statement.pdf
Signed Informed Consent Form(s) or Document(s)	94889-informed-consent-statement.pdf
Institutional Review Board Approval Form or Document	94889-institutional-review-board-statement.pdf
Non-Native Speakers of English Editing Certificate	94889-non-native-speakers.pdf
Peer-review Report	94889-peer-reviews.pdf
Scientific Misconduct Check	94889-scientific-misconduct-check.png
Scientific Editor Work List	94889-scientific-editor-work-list.pdf
CrossCheck Report	94889-crosscheck-report.pdf