| ISSN |
1948-9366 (online) |
| Open Access |
This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
| Copyright |
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. |
| Article Reprints |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
|
| Permissions |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
|
| Publisher |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA |
| Website |
http://www.wjgnet.com |
| Category |
Medicine, General & Internal |
| Manuscript Type |
Retrospective Cohort Study |
| Article Title |
Endoscopic full-thickness resection vs surgical resection for gastric stromal tumors: Efficacy and safety using propensity score matching
|
| Manuscript Source |
Unsolicited Manuscript |
| All Author List |
Si-Qiao Zhao, Si-Yao Wang, Nan Ge, Jin-Tao Guo, Xiang Liu, Guo-Xin Wang, Lei Su, Si-Yu Sun and Sheng Wang |
| ORCID |
|
| Funding Agency and Grant Number |
|
| Corresponding Author |
Sheng Wang, Chief Physician, MD, Professor, Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No. 36 Sanhao Street, Heping District, Shenyang 110004, Liaoning Province, China. wangs@sj-hospital.org |
| Key Words |
Endoscopic full-thickness resection; Gastrointestinal stromal tumors; Surgical resection; Propensity score matching; Efficacy; Progression-free survival |
| Core Tip |
This study evaluates endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) vs surgical resection (SR) for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. EFTR shows significant advantages in operative time, hospital stay, and adverse events compared to SR, with improved economic efficiency and tolerability. Although EFTR has a lower en bloc resection rate, both treatments yield similar tumor recurrence rates and progression-free survival. This research highlights EFTR's potential benefits in clinical practice while emphasizing that both methods offer comparable long-term outcomes. |
| Publish Date |
2025-02-24 09:26 |
| Citation |
<p>Zhao SQ, Wang SY, Ge N, Guo JT, Liu X, Wang GX, Su L, Sun SY, Wang S. Endoscopic full-thickness resection vs surgical resection for gastric stromal tumors: Efficacy and safety using propensity score matching. <i>World J Gastrointest Surg</i> 2025; 17(3): 101002</p> |
| URL |
https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i3/101002.htm |
| DOI |
https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.101002 |
