Publication Name	World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Manuscript ID	101896
Country	China

Received	2024-11-07 07:45
Peer-Review Started	2024-11-07 07:46
To Make the First Decision
Return for Revision	2024-11-28 09:07
Revised	2024-12-04 12:57
Second Decision	2024-12-17 02:41
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief	2024-12-17 07:18
Articles in Press	2024-12-17 07:18
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript	2024-12-29 05:48
Publish the Manuscript Online	2025-01-22 09:25

ISSN	1948-9366 (online)
Open Access	This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright	© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Article Reprints	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com

Category	Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Manuscript Type	Retrospective Study
Article Title	Retrospective comparative study of different surgical methods for gastric ulcer perforation: Efficacy and postoperative complications
Manuscript Source	Unsolicited Manuscript
All Author List	Yu-Fan Pang, Liang Shu and Cheng-Wei Xia
ORCID	Author(s) ORCID Number Yu-Fan Pang http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9129-5838 Liang Shu http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9799-2039
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author	Yu-Fan Pang, Department of Thyroid Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, No. 25 Taiping Street, Luzhou 646000, Sichuan Province, China. 1917515053@qq.com
Key Words	Gastric ulcer perforation; Surgical methods; Simple closure; Omental patch repair; Partial gastrectomy; Postoperative complications
Core Tip	This study evaluated three surgical techniques for gastric ulcer perforation: Simple closure, omental patch repair, and partial gastrectomy. While all methods are effective, omental patch repair offers the best balance of efficacy, lower complication rates, and quicker recovery. These findings emphasize the importance of tailoring surgical choices according to individual patient needs and surgeon experience.
Publish Date	2025-01-22 09:25
Citation	<p>Pang YF, Shu L, Xia CW. Retrospective comparative study of different surgical methods for gastric ulcer perforation: Efficacy and postoperative complications. <i>World J Gastrointest Surg</i> 2025; 17(2): 101896</p>
URL	https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v17/i2/101896.htm
DOI	https://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.101896

Full Article (PDF)	WJGS-17-101896-with-cover.pdf
Manuscript File	101896_Auto_Edited_082537.docx
Answering Reviewers	101896-answering-reviewers.pdf
Audio Core Tip	101896-audio.mp3
Biostatistics Review Certificate	101896-biostatistics-statement.pdf
Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure Form	101896-conflict-of-interest-statement.pdf
Copyright License Agreement	101896-copyright-assignment.pdf
Signed Informed Consent Form(s) or Document(s)	101896-informed-consent-statement.pdf
Institutional Review Board Approval Form or Document	101896-institutional-review-board-statement.pdf
Non-Native Speakers of English Editing Certificate	101896-non-native-speakers.pdf
Peer-review Report	101896-peer-reviews.pdf
Scientific Misconduct Check	101896-scientific-misconduct-check.png
Scientific Editor Work List	101896-scientific-editor-work-list.pdf
CrossCheck Report	101896-crosscheck-report.png
CrossCheck Report	101896-crosscheck-report.pdf