Publication Name	World Journal of Radiology
Manuscript ID	10432
Country	Türkiye

Received	2014-04-01 11:17
Peer-Review Started	2014-04-02 21:56
To Make the First Decision	2014-04-28 14:31
Return for Revision	2014-04-30 17:26
Revised	2014-05-09 04:52
Second Decision	2014-06-18 15:03
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief	2014-06-18 15:21
Articles in Press	2014-06-18 15:46
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor	2014-06-22 13:16
Typeset the Manuscript	2014-07-11 15:44
Publish the Manuscript Online	2014-07-31 11:53

ISSN	1949-8470 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com

Category	Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Manuscript Type	Case Report
Article Title	Differentiation of true anophthalmia from clinical anophthalmia using neuroradiological imaging
Manuscript Source	Unsolicited Manuscript
All Author List	Ali Riza Cenk Celebi and Hadi Sasani
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author	Ali Riza Cenk Celebi, MD, Ophthalmology Clinic, Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health, Nigde State Hospital, Feridun Zeren Street, Nigde 51000, Turkey. arcenkcelebi@gmail.com
Key Words	Bilateral clinical anophthalmia; Neuroradiology; Magnetic resonance imaging; Siblings; Isolated
Core Tip	Anophthalmia is a condition of the absence of an eye and the presence of a small eye within the orbit. Imaging modalities and genetic analysis are crucial for correct diagnosis and differential diagnosis. In this article, two clinical anophthalmic siblings cases are reported, emphasizing the importance of neuroradiological and orbital imaging findings in distinguishing true congenital anophthalmia from clinical anophthalmia. Anophthalmia is associated with many known syndromes. Clinical findings, as well as imaging modalities and genetic analysis, are important in making the diagnosis. Imaging modalities are crucial scanning methods. Cryptophthalmos, cyclopia, synophthalmia and congenital cystic eye should be considered in differential diagnoses. We report two clinical anophthalmic siblings, emphasizing the importance of neuroradiological and orbital imaging findings in distinguishing true congenital anophthalmia from clinical anophthalmia.
Publish Date	2014-07-31 11:53
Citation	Celebi ARC, Sasani H. Differentiation of true anophthalmia from clinical anophthalmia using neuroradiological imaging. World J Radiol 2014; 6(7): 515-518
URL	http://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v6/i7/515.htm
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v6.i7.515

Full Article (PDF)	WJR-6-515.pdf
Full Article (Word)	WJR-6-515.doc
Manuscript File	10432-Review.doc
Answering Reviewers	10432-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement	10432-Copyright assignment.pdf
Non-Native Speakers of English Editing Certificate	edited_manuscript.doc
Peer-review Report	10432-Peer review(s).pdf
Scientific Misconduct Check	10432-CrossCheck.jpg
Scientific Editor Work List	10432-Scientific editor work list.pdf