BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
7/17/2025 8:43:48 AM | Browse: 6 | Download: 26
 |
Received |
|
2025-03-28 05:45 |
 |
Peer-Review Started |
|
2025-03-28 05:45 |
 |
To Make the First Decision |
|
|
 |
Return for Revision |
|
2025-04-15 07:09 |
 |
Revised |
|
2025-04-27 08:41 |
 |
Second Decision |
|
2025-06-06 02:45 |
 |
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief |
|
|
 |
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief |
|
2025-06-07 03:03 |
 |
Articles in Press |
|
2025-06-07 03:03 |
 |
Publication Fee Transferred |
|
|
 |
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor |
|
|
 |
Typeset the Manuscript |
|
2025-07-08 07:23 |
 |
Publish the Manuscript Online |
|
2025-07-17 08:43 |
ISSN |
2218-5836 (online) |
Open Access |
This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
Copyright |
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. |
Article Reprints |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
|
Permissions |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
|
Publisher |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA |
Website |
http://www.wjgnet.com |
Category |
Orthopedics |
Manuscript Type |
Minireviews |
Article Title |
Effectiveness of the induced membrane technique in aseptic and infected long-bone defect management: Are there any differences?
|
Manuscript Source |
Invited Manuscript |
All Author List |
Alexander L Shastov, Sergey N Kolchin and Tatiana A Malkova |
ORCID |
|
Funding Agency and Grant Number |
|
Corresponding Author |
Tatiana A Malkova, Department of Medical Information and Analysis, Ilizarov National Medical Research Center for Traumatology and Orthopaedics, 6, M. Ulianova street, Kurgan 640014, Russia. tmalkova@mail.ru |
Key Words |
Long bone; Nonunion; Defect; Induced membrane technique; Infection; Spacer; Intramedullary nail; External fixator; Osteomyelitis |
Core Tip |
The induced membrane (IM) technique (IMT) has been mostly used for severe long bone defects due to open fractures and infected nonunion. The clinical studies available show its performance and outcomes on relatively small samples of patients and they are mostly infected cases. The surgeon should adequately resect non-vital tissues to prevent bone auto- or allograft lysis due to possible reinfection. The IMT gives a chance for the infection to heal after thorough debridement within the waiting period during stage 1. Its implementation frequently needs soft-tissue procedures and several grafting materials to add into the IM in critical size defects. Internal fixation is a preferred method of bone fixation to avoid the risks of external fixation complications. The interval between the stages and duration of antibiotics administration are longer in infected cases. |
Publish Date |
2025-07-17 08:43 |
Citation |
<p>Shastov AL, Kolchin SN, Malkova TA. Effectiveness of the induced membrane technique in aseptic and infected long-bone defect management: Are there any differences? <i>World J Orthop</i> 2025; 16(7): 107337</p> |
URL |
https://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v16/i7/107337.htm |
DOI |
https://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i7.107337 |
© 2004-2025 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
California Corporate Number: 3537345