BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
3/6/2026 8:56:30 AM | Browse: 4 | Download: 21
Publication Name World Journal of Clinical Pediatrics
Manuscript ID 109864
Country India
Received
2025-05-26 13:47
Peer-Review Started
2025-05-26 13:47
First Decision by Editorial Office Director
2025-06-07 03:25
Return for Revision
2025-06-07 03:25
Revised
2025-06-21 12:19
Publication Fee Transferred
Second Decision by Editor
2025-10-22 02:39
Second Decision by Editor-in-Chief
Final Decision by Editorial Office Director
2025-10-23 03:43
Articles in Press
2025-10-23 03:43
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
2025-11-02 19:56
Typeset the Manuscript
2026-02-01 17:28
Publish the Manuscript Online
2026-03-06 08:56
ISSN 2219-2808 (online)
Open Access This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Article Reprints For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website http://www.wjgnet.com
Category Emergency Medicine
Manuscript Type Randomized Controlled Trial
Article Title Early Inotropic Support Without Fluid Bolus Versus Standard Resuscitation in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial 
Manuscript Source Invited Manuscript
All Author List Swasti Keshri, Anil K Goel, Ankit Kumar Garg, Varun Anand, Sanosh Kumar Rathia and Samreen Yusuf
ORCID
Author(s) ORCID Number
Anil K Goel http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8519-5684
Samreen Yusuf http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4347-5615
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author Anil K Goel, Professor, Division of Pediatrics Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, GE Road Raipur, Raipur 492099, Chhattīsgarh, India. akgoel@aiimsraipur.edu.in
Key Words Septic shock; Fluid restriction; Inotropes; Pediatrics; No flush
Core Tip The current surviving sepsis guidelines 2020 recommend fluid boluses of 10-20 ml/kg/bolus, up to 40-60 ml/kg, but recent studies show better outcomes when fluid boluses are restricted. The FEAST trial compared a fluid bolus in children septic shock and reported a 35% higher mortality. Studies have also compared restricted fluid boluses with liberal fluid boluses, with better outcomes observed in the restricted bolus group. This study is an open-level study in children aged 1 month to 14 years, hospitalised for septic shock. Randomization was done to,  Intervention Group I (early Inotropes without giving fluid bolus) or comparator, Fluid resususitation Group F, with an allocation ratio of 1:1.  There was no statistically significant difference in the initial inotropic support (VIS score), the total duration of ventilation, total length of hospital stay, mortality at 48 hours, or overall mortality between the two groups. In patients with hypotensive shock, mortality at 48 hours was significantly higher in patients receiving fluid boluses. A striking 65% of the patients receiving fluid boluses developed some signs of fluid overload.
Publish Date 2026-03-06 08:56
Citation

Keshri S, Goel AK, Garg AK, Anand V, Rathia SK, Yusuf S. Early Inotropic Support Without Fluid Bolus Versus Standard Resuscitation in Pediatric Septic Shock: A Randomized Controlled Trial. World J Clin Pediatr 2026; 15(1): 109864

URL https://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2808/full/v15/i1/109864.htm
DOI https://dx.doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v15.i1.109864
Full Article (PDF) WJCP-15-109864-with-cover.pdf
CONSORT 2010 Statement 109864-CONSORT-2010-statement.pdf
Manuscript File 109864.docx
Answering Reviewers 109864-answering-reviewers.pdf
Audio Core Tip 109864-audio.m4a
Biostatistics Review Certificate 109864-biostatistics-statement.pdf
Clinical Trial Registration Statement 109864-clinical-trial-registration-statement.pdf
Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure Form 109864-conflict-of-interest-statement.pdf
Copyright License Agreement 109864-copyright-assignment.pdf
Signed Informed Consent Form(s) or Document(s) 109864-informed-consent-statement.pdf
Institutional Review Board Approval Form or Document 109864-institutional-review-board-statement.pdf
Non-Native Speakers of English Editing Certificate 109864-non-native-speakers.pdf
Supplementary Material 109864-supplementary-material.pdf
Peer-review Report 109864-peer-reviews.pdf
Scientific Misconduct Check 109864-scientific-misconduct-check.png
Scientific Editor Work List 109864-scientific-editor-work-list.pdf
CrossCheck Report 109864-crosscheck-report.pdf