Publication Name	World Journal of Clinical Urology
Manuscript ID	11575
Country	Iran

Received	2014-05-28 10:37
Peer-Review Started	2014-05-29 08:27
To Make the First Decision	2014-07-29 12:01
Return for Revision	2014-07-30 09:58
Revised	2014-08-29 00:56
Second Decision	2014-10-10 18:03
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief	2014-10-10 18:17
Articles in Press	2014-10-10 18:17
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript	2014-11-17 08:40
Publish the Manuscript Online	2014-11-19 17:43

ISSN	2219-2816 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com

Category	Urology & Nephrology
Manuscript Type	Minireviews
Article Title	Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stone: A review article
Manuscript Source	Invited Manuscript
All Author List	Pejman Shadpour, Seyed Saeed Modaresi, Robab Maghsoudi and Roozbeh Roohinezhad
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author	Seyed Saeed Modaresi, MD, Fellowship of Endourology, Hasheminejad Clinical Research Development Center, Hasheminejad Kidney Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 19697, Iran. modaresis@razi.tums.ac.ir
Key Words	Upper ureteral stones; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy; Laparoscopy; Ureteral calculi
Core Tip	It’s an honor to write a prestigious editing board; there is a review article study to compare between percutaneous nephrolithotomy and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for treatment of large upper ureteral stones. These two procedures are different in many aspects and it’s not clearly defined that which one is preferred option.
Publish Date	2014-11-19 17:43
Citation	Shadpour P, Modaresi SS, Maghsoudi R, Roohinezhad R. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for large upper ureteral stone: A review article. World J Clin Urol 2014; 3(3): 336-339
URL	http://www.wjgnet.com/2219-2816/full/v3/i3/336.htm
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.5410/wjcu.v3.i3.336

Full Article (PDF)	WJCU-3-336.pdf
Full Article (Word)	WJCU-3-336.doc
Manuscript File	11575-Review.docx
Answering Reviewers	11575-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement	11575-Copyright assignment.pdf
Peer-review Report	11575-Peer review(s).pdf
Scientific Misconduct Check	11575-CrossCheck.jpg
Scientific Editor Work List	11575-Scientific editor work list.pdf