Publication Name	World Journal of Meta-Analysis
Manuscript ID	11733
Country	United States

Received	2014-06-02 11:27
Peer-Review Started	2014-06-03 22:23
To Make the First Decision	2014-07-18 12:35
Return for Revision	2014-07-18 16:24
Revised	2014-09-12 04:12
Second Decision	2014-10-16 15:16
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief	2014-10-16 15:59
Articles in Press	2014-10-16 15:59
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript	2014-11-20 09:08
Publish the Manuscript Online	2014-12-02 12:25

ISSN	2308-3840 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com

Category	Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Manuscript Type	Meta-Analysis
Article Title	Diagnostic yield of third eye retroscope on adenoma detection during colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Manuscript Source	Invited Manuscript
All Author List	Nirav Thosani, Bhavana Rao, Sachin Batra, Babatunde Adeyefa, Gottumukkala S Raju, Robert S Bresalier, Subhas Banerjee and Sushovan Guha
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author	Nirav Thosani, MD, MHA, Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas Medical School, MSB 4.234, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, United States. ncthosani@gmail.com
Key Words	Third Eye Retroscope; Screening colonoscopy; Adenoma detection rate; Polyp detection rate; Additional adenoma detection rate; Additional polyp detection rate
Core Tip	Missed lesions remain one of the main causes for development of interval colorectal cancer after screening colonoscopy. The third eye retroscope (TER) provides an additional retrograde view to visualize lesions on the proximal aspects of folds. In this meta-analysis of four studies including 920 patients undergoing screening colonoscopy, we observed that the additional adenoma detection rate, defined as the number of additional adenomas identified due to TER device in comparison to standard colonoscopy alone, was 19.9% (95%CI: 7.3-43.9). We found that TER device was safe and identified significant more numbers of adenoma which would have been missed by standard colonoscopy alone.
Publish Date	2014-12-02 12:25
Citation	Thosani N, Rao B, Batra S, Adeyefa B, Raju GS, Bresalier RS, Banerjee S, Guha S. Diagnostic yield of third eye retroscope on adenoma detection during colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2014; 2(4): 162-170
URL	http://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v2/i4/162.htm
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v2.i4.162

Full Article (PDF)	WJMA-2-162.pdf
Full Article (Word)	WJMA-2-162.doc
Manuscript File	11733-Review.doc
Answering Reviewers	11733-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement	11733-Copyright assignment.pdf
Peer-review Report	11733-Peer review(s).pdf
Scientific Misconduct Check	11733-CrossCheck.jpg
Scientific Editor Work List	11733-Scientific editor work list.pdf