BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
9/28/2026 3:38:56 AM | Browse: 0 | Download: 0
 |
Received |
|
2026-05-27 06:27 |
|
Peer-Review Started |
|
2026-05-27 06:31 |
 |
First Decision by Editorial Office Director |
|
|
|
Return for Revision |
|
2026-07-14 08:36 |
|
Revised |
|
2026-07-24 15:19 |
|
Publication Fee Transferred |
|
|
|
Second Decision by Editor |
|
2026-08-25 02:33 |
|
Second Decision by Editor-in-Chief |
|
|
|
Final Decision by Editorial Office Director |
|
2026-08-25 09:30 |
|
Articles in Press |
|
2026-08-25 09:30 |
|
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor |
|
|
|
Typeset the Manuscript |
|
2026-09-21 10:13 |
|
Publish the Manuscript Online |
|
2026-09-28 03:38 |
| ISSN |
1949-8470 (online) |
| Open Access |
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See Permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. |
| Copyright |
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. No commercial re-use. See Permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. |
| Article Reprints |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
|
| Permissions |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
|
| Publisher |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA |
| Website |
http://www.wjgnet.com |
| Category |
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging |
| Manuscript Type |
Retrospective Study |
| Article Title |
Comparing the reliability of three software programmes for manual and (semi-)automatic volumetry in healthy livers
|
| Manuscript Source |
Unsolicited Manuscript |
| All Author List |
Ariadne L van der Velden, Robrecht R M M Knapen, Sinéad James, Hossein Rahmani, Ralph Brecheisen, Sander M J van Kuijk, Joachim E Wildberger, Ronald M van Dam and Christiaan van der Leij |
| ORCID |
|
| Funding Agency and Grant Number |
|
| Corresponding Author |
Christiaan van der Leij, Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, P. Debyelaan 25, Maastricht 6229 HX, Limburg, Netherlands. christiaan.vander.leij@mumc.nl |
| Key Words |
Liver malignancy; Liver volumetry software; (Semi)automated segmentation; Manual segmentation; Imaging-based volumetry |
| Core Tip |
This study compared three software programs (semi-automatic and manual) for computed tomography-based liver volumetry in 200 patients. Total liver volume and segment II/III volume – used as a surrogate for the future liver remnant – showed excellent interobserver agreement and strong agreement between all three software programs. Although Synapse 3D, Syngo.via, and OsiriX® produced small systematic differences in absolute volume estimates, the standardized future liver remnant remained comparable. These findings indicate that all three programs can provide reliable liver volumetry, while highlighting that absolute measurements should be interpreted in relation to the software used. |
| Publish Date |
2026-09-28 03:38 |
| Citation |
van der Velden AL, Knapen RRMM, James S, Rahmani H, Brecheisen R, van Kuijk SMJ, Wildberger JE, van Dam RM, van der Leij C. Comparing the reliability of three software programmes for manual and (semi-)automatic volumetry in healthy livers. World J Radiol 2026; 18(9): 123720
|
| URL |
https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8470/full/v18/i9/123720.htm |
| DOI |
https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.123720 |
Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA. All rights reserved, including rights relating to text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open-access content, the applicable copyright and licensing terms govern.
