BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
11/12/2026 3:43:56 AM | Browse: 0 | Download: 0
 |
Received |
|
2026-06-04 08:25 |
|
Peer-Review Started |
|
2026-06-04 08:25 |
 |
First Decision by Editorial Office Director |
|
|
|
Return for Revision |
|
2026-07-07 06:27 |
|
Revised |
|
2026-08-03 09:41 |
|
Publication Fee Transferred |
|
2026-08-18 09:35 |
|
Second Decision by Editor |
|
2026-09-10 02:43 |
|
Second Decision by Editor-in-Chief |
|
|
|
Final Decision by Editorial Office Director |
|
2026-09-10 09:20 |
|
Articles in Press |
|
2026-09-10 09:20 |
|
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor |
|
|
|
Typeset the Manuscript |
|
2026-09-15 09:57 |
|
Publish the Manuscript Online |
|
2026-11-12 03:43 |
| ISSN |
1948-9366 (online) |
| Open Access |
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See Permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. |
| Copyright |
©Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. No commercial re-use. See Permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. |
| Article Reprints |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
|
| Permissions |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
|
| Publisher |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA |
| Website |
http://www.wjgnet.com |
| Category |
Surgery |
| Manuscript Type |
Retrospective Study |
| Article Title |
Incision and drainage vs minimally invasive catheter drainage on pain and anal function in high perianal abscess patients
|
| Manuscript Source |
Unsolicited Manuscript |
| All Author List |
Ke-Ke Ma, Hui-Chao Chen and Yi-Qin Lu |
| ORCID |
|
| Funding Agency and Grant Number |
|
| Corresponding Author |
Yi-Qin Lu, MD, Department of AnoRectal Surgery, Wuxi Ninth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, No. 999 Liangxi Road, Binhu District, Wuxi 214000, Jiangsu Province, China. lyqwxjy@163.com |
| Key Words |
Perianal abscess; Incision and drainage; Minimally invasive catheter drainage; Pain; Anal function |
| Core Tip |
This retrospective study compared incision and drainage with selective seton placement vs minimally invasive catheter drainage (MICD) for high perianal abscesses. MICD demonstrates significant advantages in reducing postoperative pain and preserving anal sphincter function. Notably, the observed lower fistula rate with MICD is confounded by differing intraoperative management of the internal opening between techniques. These findings support MICD as a promising, patient-centered alternative, though further validation with standardized protocols is required. |
| Publish Date |
2026-11-12 03:43 |
| Citation |
Ma KK, Chen HC, Lu YQ. Incision and drainage vs minimally invasive catheter drainage on pain and anal function in high perianal abscess patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(11): 124019
|
| URL |
https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v18/i11/124019.htm |
| DOI |
https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.124019 |
Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA. All rights reserved, including rights relating to text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open-access content, the applicable copyright and licensing terms govern.
