BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
12/25/2014 6:22:00 PM | Browse: 974 | Download: 923
Publication Name World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Manuscript ID 13149
Country United Kingdom
Received
2014-08-12 09:49
Peer-Review Started
2014-08-24 12:57
To Make the First Decision
2014-09-16 10:47
Return for Revision
2014-09-18 14:38
Revised
2014-09-22 00:00
Second Decision
2014-11-03 17:05
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief
2014-11-03 17:19
Articles in Press
2014-11-03 17:19
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript
2014-12-22 10:54
Publish the Manuscript Online
2014-12-25 18:22
ISSN 1948-9366 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website http://www.wjgnet.com
Category Surgery
Manuscript Type Systematic Reviews
Article Title Systematic review of absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures used for the closure of surgical incisions
Manuscript Source Unsolicited Manuscript
All Author List Muhammad S Sajid, Malcolm R McFall, Pauline A Whitehouse and Parv S Sains
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author Mr. Muhammad S Sajid, Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust, Washington Suite, North Wing, Worthing Hospital, BN11 2DH West Sussex, United Kingdom. surgeon1wrh@hotmail.com
Key Words Skin closure; Surgical site infection; Wound dehiscence; Absorbable sutures; Non-absorbable suture
Core Tip Based upon the meta-analysis of 10 controlled trials, the absorbable sutures (AS) are similar to non-AS (NAS) for skin closure in cases of wound infection and other complications. AS do not increase the risk of skin wound dehiscence, rather leads to a reduced risk of wound break-down compared to NAS.
Publish Date 2014-12-25 18:22
Citation Sajid MS, McFall MR, Whitehouse PA, Sains PS. Systematic review of absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures used for the closure of surgical incisions. World J Gastrointest Surg 2014; 6(12): 241-247
URL http://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9366/full/v6/i12/241.htm
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v6.i12.241
Full Article (PDF) WJGS-6-241.pdf
Full Article (Word) WJGS-6-241.doc
Manuscript File 13149-Review.doc
Answering Reviewers 13149-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement 13149-Copyright assignment.pdf
Peer-review Report 13149-Peer review(s).pdf
Scientific Misconduct Check 13149-CrossCheck.jpg
Scientific Editor Work List 13149-Scientific editor work list.pdf