Publication Name	World Journal of Meta-Analysis
Manuscript ID	16504
Country	Belgium

Received	2015-01-20 18:04
Peer-Review Started	2015-01-24 19:37
To Make the First Decision	2015-02-07 14:59
Return for Revision	2015-02-11 10:12
Revised	2015-02-21 03:50
Second Decision	2015-03-20 11:52
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief	2015-03-21 14:49
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief	2015-04-07 15:46
Articles in Press	2015-04-07 15:46
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript	2015-04-10 08:50
Publish the Manuscript Online	2015-04-28 10:11

ISSN	2308-3840 (online)
Open Access	This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright	© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Article Reprints	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com

Category	Rheumatology
Manuscript Type	Editorial
Article Title	Low back pain-related meta-analysis: Caution is needed when interpreting published research results
Manuscript Source	Invited Manuscript
All Author List	Christophe Demoulin, Olivier Bruyère, Pierre-René Somville and Marc Vanderthommen
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author	Christophe Demoulin, PT, PhD, Department of Sport and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Liege, ISEPK, Bat B21, Allée des Sports, 4000 Liege, Belgium. christophe.demoulin@ulg.ac.be
Key Words	Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Spine; Back pain; Limitations; Recommendations; Evidence-based practice
Core Tip	Although meta-analysis are at the top of the evidence pyramid and have several strengths, the conclusions drawn from systematic reviews combined to a meta-analysis should always be interpreted with caution because they can also have weaknesses. This is true, whether it be for low back pain-related systematic reviews including a meta-analysis, or any other. Therefore, a critical analysis of a systematic review is always needed before integrating the results in its own clinical practice. Furthermore, clinical reasoning remains crucial, especially to consider the potential differences between one’s patient and the patients included in the meta-analysis.
Publish Date	2015-04-28 10:11
Citation	Demoulin C, Bruyère O, Somville PR, Vanderthommen M. Low back pain-related meta-analysis: Caution is needed when interpreting published research results. World J Meta-Anal 2015; 3(2): 93-96
URL	http://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v3/i2/93.htm
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v3.i2.93

Full Article (PDF)	WJMA-3-93.pdf
Full Article (Word)	WJMA-3-93.doc
Manuscript File	16504-Review.docx
Answering Reviewers	16504-Answering reviewers.pdf
Audio Core Tip	16504-Audio core tip.mp3
Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure Form	16504-Conflict-of-interest statement.pdf
Copyright License Agreement	16504-Copyright assignment.pdf
Peer-review Report	16504-Peer-review(s).pdf
Journal Editor-in-Chief Review Report	16504-Journal editor-in-chief review report.pdf
Scientific Misconduct Check	16504-Scientific misconduct check.pdf
Scientific Editor Work List	16504-Scientific editor work list.pdf