Publication Name	World Journal of Meta-Analysis
Manuscript ID	19746
Country	United Kingdom

Received	2015-05-20 09:54
Peer-Review Started	2015-05-20 19:31
To Make the First Decision	2015-06-19 17:42
Return for Revision	2015-06-24 15:29
Revised	2015-07-18 20:25
Second Decision	2015-10-23 16:28
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief	2015-11-09 17:12
Articles in Press	2015-11-09 17:13
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript	2016-04-01 10:28
Publish the Manuscript Online	2016-04-13 13:54

ISSN	2308-3840 (online)
Open Access	This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright	© The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Article Reprints	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com

Category	Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Manuscript Type	Meta-Analysis
Article Title	Meta-analysis comparing differing methods of endoscopic therapy for colorectal lesions
Manuscript Source	Unsolicited Manuscript
All Author List	Nisha Patel, James Alexander, Hutan Ashrafian, Thanos Athanasiou, Ara Darzi and Julian Teare
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author	Nisha Patel, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, Clinical Research Fellow, Department of Gastroenterology, St Mary’s Hospital, Imperial College London, Praed Street, London W2 1NY, United Kingdom. nishakpatel1@gmail.com
Key Words	Colorectal; Colonic polyp; Endoscopic mucosal resection; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Colorectal cancer
Core Tip	Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the conventional resection method of colorectal polyps. However certain lesions such as large sessile polyps can be challenging. Piecemeal resection has been shown to result in a high recurrence rate requiring further endoscopic sessions or surgery. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is still at a relatively early stage, there are very few studies directly comparing the two modalities, few randomised controlled trials and fewer still reporting longer-term outcomes. This meta-analysis reports mid-term follow-up outcomes of colorectal ESD and EMR. ESD demonstrates higher en-bloc resection rates and lower mid-term recurrence rates compared to colorectal EMR albeit with higher complication rates.
Publish Date	2016-04-13 13:54
Citation	Patel N, Alexander J, Ashrafian H, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Teare J. Meta-analysis comparing differing methods of endoscopic therapy for colorectal lesions. World J Meta-Anal 2016; 4(2): 44-54
URL	http://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v4/i2/44.htm
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v4.i2.44

Full Article (PDF)	WJMA-4-44.pdf
Full Article (Word)	WJMA-4-44.doc
Manuscript File	19746-Review.doc
Answering Reviewers	19746-Answering reviewers.pdf
Audio Core Tip	19746-Audio core tip.mp3
Biostatistics Review Certificate	19746-Biostatistics statement.pdf
Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure Form	19746-Conflict-of-interest statement.pdf
Copyright License Agreement	19746-Copyright assignment.pdf
Supplementary Material	19746-Supplementary material.pdf
Peer-review Report	19746-Peer-review(s).pdf
Scientific Misconduct Check	19746-Scientific misconduct check.pdf
Scientific Editor Work List	19746-Scientific editor work list.pdf