Publication Name	World Journal of Meta-Analysis
Manuscript ID	30116
Country	United States

Received	2016-09-12 11:23
Peer-Review Started
To Make the First Decision	2016-09-13 14:07
Return for Revision	2016-09-13 20:00
Revised	2016-09-28 04:48
Second Decision	2016-12-07 16:36
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief	2016-12-14 16:50
Articles in Press	2016-12-14 16:50
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript	2017-04-18 11:18
Publish the Manuscript Online	2017-04-26 11:29

ISSN	2308-3840 (online)
Open Access	This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Copyright	© The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Article Reprints	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com

Category	Medicine, Research & Experimental
Manuscript Type	Meta-Analysis
Article Title	Is there a difference between 19G core biopsy needle and 22G core biopsy needle in diagnosing the correct etiology? - A meta-analysis and systematic review
Manuscript Source	Unsolicited Manuscript
All Author List	Manasa Kandula, Matthew L Bechtold, Kaninika Verma, Bhagat S Aulakh, Deepak Taneja and Srinivas R Puli
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author	Manasa Kandula, MD, Division of Internal Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL 61614, United States. manasakandula14@gmail.com
Key Words	Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration; solid mass lesions; Endoscopic ultrasound; pancreatic mass; pancreatic cytology; core biopsies; 19G procore needle; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; 22G procore needle
Core Tip	Management of pancreatic solid mass lesions relies greatly on accuracy of diagnosis of these lesions. Procore fine needle biopsy needles have been found to have a diagnostic accuracy comparable to, if not better than the standard needles in diagnosing the intestinal and extra-intestinal mass lesions. Amongst the Procore needles, the 19G and 22G Procore needles have both been shown to obtain good quality core tissue samples but both have unique characteristics of their own. This meta-analysis compares the feasibility and accuracy of 19G and 22G Procore needles in determining the diagnosis of solid mass lesions.
Publish Date	2017-04-26 11:29
Citation	Kandula M, Bechtold ML, Verma K, Aulakh BS, Taneja D, Puli SR. Is there a difference between 19G core biopsy needle and 22G core biopsy needle in diagnosing the correct etiology? - A meta-analysis and systematic review. World J Meta-Anal 2017; 5(2): 54-62
URL	http://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v5/i2/54.htm
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v5.i2.54

Full Article (PDF)	WJMA-5-54.pdf
Full Article (Word)	WJMA-5-54.doc
Manuscript File	30116-Review.docx
Answering Reviewers	30116-Answering reviewers.pdf
Audio Core Tip	30116-Audio core tip.mp3
Biostatistics Review Certificate	30116-Biostatistics statement.pdf
Conflict-of-Interest Disclosure Form	30116-Conflict-of-interest statement.pdf
Copyright License Agreement	30116-Copyright assignment.pdf
Peer-review Report	30116-Peer-review(s).pdf
Scientific Misconduct Check	30116-Scientific misconduct check.pdf
Scientific Editor Work List	30116-Scientific editor work list.pdf