BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
11/27/2017 2:36:58 AM | Browse: 1076 | Download: 1824
 |
Received |
|
2017-07-11 06:39 |
 |
Peer-Review Started |
|
2017-07-12 01:06 |
 |
To Make the First Decision |
|
2017-08-30 02:56 |
 |
Return for Revision |
|
2017-08-31 06:49 |
 |
Revised |
|
2017-09-09 11:34 |
 |
Second Decision |
|
2017-09-15 01:59 |
 |
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief |
|
|
 |
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief |
|
2017-09-19 20:58 |
 |
Articles in Press |
|
2017-09-19 20:58 |
 |
Publication Fee Transferred |
|
2017-10-12 03:49 |
 |
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor |
|
|
 |
Typeset the Manuscript |
|
2017-11-17 02:15 |
 |
Publish the Manuscript Online |
|
2017-11-27 02:36 |
ISSN |
1007-9327 (print) and 2219-2840 (online) |
Open Access |
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
Copyright |
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. |
Article Reprints |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
|
Permissions |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
|
Publisher |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA |
Website |
http://www.wjgnet.com |
Category |
Surgery |
Manuscript Type |
Meta-Analysis |
Article Title |
Short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic vs open rectal excision for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
|
Manuscript Source |
Unsolicited Manuscript |
All Author List |
Aleix Martínez-Pérez, Maria Clotilde Carra, Francesco Brunetti and Nicola de'Angelis |
ORCID |
|
Funding Agency and Grant Number |
|
Corresponding Author |
Nicola de'Angelis, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Digestive, Hepato-biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, Université Paris Est - UPEC, 51 avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, Créteil 94010, France. nicola.deangelis@aphp.fr |
Key Words |
Laparoscopic rectal resection; Open rectal resection; Laparoscopy; Rectal cancer; Postoperative morbidity; Short-term outcomes; Systematic review; Meta-analysis |
Core Tip |
There is no consensus on which technique, between laparoscopic rectal resection (LRR) and open rectal resection (ORR), is more beneficial for the patient. A systematic review and meta-analysis exclusively based on randomized clinical trials comparing LRR vs ORR has been performed. The pooled analyses focused on the evaluation and comparison of short-term clinical outcomes and showed that postoperative morbidity and mortality are similar between the two surgical approaches. However, LRR is associated with lesser blood loss and smaller incision length, which may represent clinical advantages for the patient. |
Publish Date |
2017-11-27 02:36 |
Citation |
Martínez-Pérez A, Carra MC, Brunetti F, de’Angelis N. Short-term clinical outcomes of laparoscopic vs open rectal excision for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23(44): 7906-7916 |
URL |
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v23/i44/7906.htm |
DOI |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i44.7906 |
© 2004-2025 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
California Corporate Number: 3537345