BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
9/12/2014 8:41:00 PM | Browse: 959 | Download: 850
Publication Name World Journal of Gastroenterology
Manuscript ID 3755
Country China
Received
2013-05-21 08:53
Peer-Review Started
2013-05-21 19:16
To Make the First Decision
2013-07-19 08:55
Return for Revision
2013-07-20 22:52
Revised
2013-08-17 20:55
Second Decision
2013-09-03 14:31
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief
2013-09-04 07:42
Articles in Press
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript
2013-11-06 19:04
Publish the Manuscript Online
2013-11-16 18:29
ISSN 1007-9327 (print) and 2219-2840 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website http://www.wjgnet.com
Category Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Manuscript Type Meta-Analysis
Article Title Magnetic endoscopic imaging vs standard colonoscopy: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Manuscript Source Invited Manuscript
All Author List Yi Chen, Yu-Ting Duan, Qin Xie, Xian-Peng Qin, Bo Chen, Lin Xia, Yong Zhou, Ning-Ning Li and Xiao-Ting Wu
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Funding Agency Grant Number
National Natural Science Foundation of China 81172374
Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Department Application Infrastructure Plan 2013JY0154
Corresponding Author Xiao-Ting Wu, MD, PhD, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Guoxuexiang No. 37, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China. wuxiaoting1975@gmail.com
Key Words Colonoscope; Magnetic endoscope imaging; Magnetic; Standard colonoscope; Meta-analysis
Core Tip This study aimed to assess the theoretical advantages of magnetic endoscopic imaging (MEI) over standard colonoscopy (SC) and to compare the efficacies of MEI and SC. The meta-analyses compared the cecal intubation rate and time, sedation dose used, abdominal pain scores and the use of ancillary maneuvers between MEI and SC. The real-time magnetic imaging system is of benefit in training and educating inexperienced endoscopists, and it improved the cecal intubation rate for both experienced and inexperienced endoscopists.
Publish Date 2013-11-16 18:29
Citation Chen Y, Duan YT, Xie Q, Qin XP, Chen B, Xia L, Zhou Y, Li NN, Wu XT. Magnetic endoscopic imaging vs standard colonoscopy: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(41): 7197-7204
URL http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i41/7197.htm
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i41.7197
Full Article (PDF) WJG-19-7197.pdf
Manuscript File 3755-Review.doc
Answering Reviewers 3755-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement 3755-Copyright assignment.doc
Non-Native Speakers of English Editing Certificate 3755-Language certificate.pdf
Peer-review Report 3755-Peer review(s).pdf
Scientific Editor Work List 3755-Scientific editor work list.doc