Publication Name	World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Manuscript ID	4386
Country	South Korea

Received	2013-07-01 08:35
Peer-Review Started	2013-07-01 14:11
First Decision by Editorial Office Director
Return for Revision	2013-07-19 21:50
Revised	2013-08-07 20:29
Publication Fee Transferred
Second Decision by Editor	2013-08-29 08:28
Second Decision by Editor-in-Chief
Final Decision by Editorial Office Director	2013-08-29 10:25
Articles in Press
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript	2013-09-23 10:04
Publish the Manuscript Online	2013-10-15 17:13

ISSN	1948-5190 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com

Category	Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Manuscript Type	Review
Article Title	Which endoscopic treatment is the best for small rectal carcinoid tumors?
Manuscript Source	Invited Manuscript
All Author List	Hyun Ho Choi, Jin Su Kim, Dae Young Cheung and Young-Seok Cho
Funding Agency and Grant Number	Funding Agency Grant Number Catholic Cancer Center made in the program of 2010 National Research Foundation of Korea 2010-0023295
Corresponding Author	Young-Seok Cho, MD, PhD, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, 271 Cheonbo-ro, Uijeongbu 480-717, South Korea. yscho@catholic.ac.kr
Key Words	Carcinoid tumor; Rectum; Polypectomy; Endoscopic mucosal resection; Endoscopic submucosal dissection
Core Tip	Rectal carcinoids less than 10 mm in diameter can be resected by various endoscopic techniques, such as conventional polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), cap-assisted EMR (EMR-C), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). There are currently limited comparative data to recommend a specific endoscopic treatment. Therefore, the choice of treatment modalities for small rectal carcinoids depends on the degree of endoscopic or surgical expertise at a given facility. Furthermore, any one of the above treatment methods could have a favorable clinical outcome if performed by gastroenterologists or surgeons with special techniques. EMR-C and TEM can be used as a salvage treatment after incomplete resection by endoscopic polypectomy. The efficacy of endoscopic submucosal resection with ligating device and ESD for salvage treatment requires further investigation.
Publish Date	2013-10-15 17:13
Citation	Choi HH, Kim JS, Cheung DY, Cho YS. Which endoscopic treatment is the best for small rectal carcinoid tumors? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5(10): 487-494
URL	http://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v5/i10/487.htm
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v5.i10.487

Full Article (PDF)	WJGE-5-487.pdf
Manuscript File	4386-Review.doc
Answering Reviewers	4386-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement	4386-Copyright assignment.pdf
Non-Native Speakers of English Editing Certificate	4386-Language certificate.pdf
Peer-review Report	4386-Peer review(s).pdf
Scientific Editor Work List	4386-Scientific editor work list.doc