BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
9/11/2014 8:39:00 PM | Browse: 1202 | Download: 975
 |
Received |
|
2013-07-30 10:07 |
 |
Peer-Review Started |
|
2013-07-30 21:34 |
 |
To Make the First Decision |
|
2013-09-09 16:41 |
 |
Return for Revision |
|
2013-09-12 20:28 |
 |
Revised |
|
2013-09-17 23:40 |
 |
Second Decision |
|
2013-11-04 18:04 |
 |
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief |
|
|
 |
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief |
|
2013-11-05 10:31 |
 |
Articles in Press |
|
|
 |
Publication Fee Transferred |
|
|
 |
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor |
|
|
 |
Typeset the Manuscript |
|
2013-12-18 16:41 |
 |
Publish the Manuscript Online |
|
2014-01-14 20:11 |
Category |
Gastroenterology & Hepatology |
Manuscript Type |
Topic Highlights |
Article Title |
Current management of fecal incontinence: Choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes
|
Manuscript Source |
Invited Manuscript |
All Author List |
Julie Ann M Van Koughnett and Steven D Wexner |
Funding Agency and Grant Number |
Funding Agency |
Grant Number |
Incontinence Devices, Inc |
|
Mediri Therapeutics, Inc. |
|
Medtronic Inc. |
|
Renew Medical |
|
Salix Pharmaceuticals |
|
|
Corresponding Author |
Steven D Wexner, MD, PhD(Hon), FACS, FRCS, FRCS(Ed), Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Boulevard, Weston, FL 33331, United States. wexners@ccf.org |
Key Words |
Fecal incontinence; Treatment; Sacral nerve stimulation; Sphincteroplasty; Artificial bowel Sphincter; Biofeedback |
Core Tip |
An increasing number of treatment options for the management of fecal incontinence have been developed. In addition to traditional options such as sphincteroplasty and colostomy, non-surgical options such as biofeedback and dietary modification may be considered for mild incontinence. Injectable materials and radiofrequency energy delivery are two newer treatments for mild incontinence. Surgical options for moderate to severe incontinence include sacral nerve stimulation, artificial bowel sphincter implantation, muscle transposition, antegrade continence enemas, sphincteroplasty, and colostomy formation. Treatment for fecal incontinence (repair, stimulation, replacement, augmentation, or diversion) must be individualized to the patient, considering the underlying cause and impact on quality of life of the fecal incontinence.
|
Publish Date |
2014-01-14 20:11 |
Citation |
Van Koughnett JAM, Wexner SD. Current management of fecal incontinence: Choosing amongst treatment options to optimize outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(48): 9216-9230 |
URL |
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i48/9216.htm |
DOI |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i48.9216 |
© 2004-2025 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
California Corporate Number: 3537345