Publication Name	World Journal of Gastroenterology
Manuscript ID	5278
Country	China

Received	2013-08-27 11:12
Peer-Review Started	2013-08-27 15:31
To Make the First Decision	2013-10-14 21:03
Return for Revision	2013-10-15 11:42
Revised	2013-10-29 20:01
Second Decision	2014-01-20 16:42
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief	2014-01-20 18:01
Articles in Press
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor	2014-03-09 09:05
Typeset the Manuscript	2014-04-25 14:32
Publish the Manuscript Online	2014-05-14 10:58

ISSN	1007-9327 (print) and 2219-2840 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com

Category	Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Manuscript Type	Meta-Analysis
Article Title	Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal cancer
Manuscript Source	Invited Manuscript
All Author List	Hui-Min Guo, Xiao-Qi Zhang, Min Chen, Shu-Ling Huang and Xiao-Ping Zou
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author	Xiao-Ping Zou, PhD, Department of Gastroenterology, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, 321 Zhongshan Road, Nanjing 210008, Jiangsu Province, China. zouxiaoping795@hotmail.com
Key Words	Superficial esophageal cancer; Endoscopic mucosal resection; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Meta-analysis
Core Tip	This meta-analysis was performed on the basis of previously published reports aiming to compare endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in treating superficial esophageal cancer. Eight studies involving 1081 patients were analyzed. Of those, 448 lesions were treated by ESD and 744 were treated by EMR. Compared with EMR, ESD had significantly higher overall en bloc and curative resection rates, and lower local recurrence rate. There was no significant difference in the complication rate between the two methods.
Publish Date	2014-05-14 10:58
Citation	Guo HM, Zhang XQ, Chen M, Huang SL, Zou XP. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(18): 5540-5547
URL	http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i18/5540.htm
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i18.5540

Full Article (PDF)	WJG-20-5540.pdf
Full Article (Word)	WJG-20-5540.doc
Manuscript File	5278-Review.doc
Answering Reviewers	5278-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement	5278-Copyright assignment.pdf
Non-Native Speakers of English Editing Certificate	5278-Language certificate.pdf
Peer-review Report	5278-Peer review(s).pdf
Scientific Editor Work List	5278-Scientific editor work list.doc