BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
12/27/2021 5:24:00 AM | Browse: 450 | Download: 801
 |
Received |
|
2021-02-25 22:57 |
 |
Peer-Review Started |
|
2021-02-25 23:05 |
 |
To Make the First Decision |
|
|
 |
Return for Revision |
|
2021-05-13 21:59 |
 |
Revised |
|
2021-05-26 23:36 |
 |
Second Decision |
|
2021-11-26 03:32 |
 |
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief |
|
|
 |
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief |
|
2021-11-28 07:55 |
 |
Articles in Press |
|
2021-11-28 07:55 |
 |
Publication Fee Transferred |
|
|
 |
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor |
|
2021-11-01 02:37 |
 |
Typeset the Manuscript |
|
2021-12-21 04:06 |
 |
Publish the Manuscript Online |
|
2021-12-27 05:24 |
ISSN |
1948-5182 (online) |
Open Access |
This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
Copyright |
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. |
Article Reprints |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
|
Permissions |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
|
Publisher |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA |
Website |
http://www.wjgnet.com |
Category |
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging |
Manuscript Type |
Minireviews |
Article Title |
Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques
|
Manuscript Source |
Invited Manuscript |
All Author List |
Patrícia S Freitas, Catarina Janicas, José Veiga, António P Matos, Vasco Herédia and Miguel Ramalho |
ORCID |
|
Funding Agency and Grant Number |
|
Corresponding Author |
Miguel Ramalho, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Radiology, Hospital Garcia de Orta, EPE, Av. Torrado da Silva, Almada 2805-267, Portugal. miguel-ramalho@netcabo.pt |
Key Words |
Liver metastases; Magnetic resonance imaging; Computed tomography; Oncology; Ultrasound; Follow-up |
Core Tip |
Several imaging methods are clinically available to evaluate and characterize liver metastases. Both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are currently the techniques that show the highest diagnostic performance and are also the most suitable for assessing therapy response and follow-up. Several studies have shown that MRI has a higher sensitivity for detecting and characterizing liver metastases; therefore, it may be the ideal imaging method for treatment planning before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The traditional paradigm for ordering imaging studies emphasizes diagnostic accuracy, which is why we believe that MRI should be favored when available, the first-line imaging for detecting liver metastases, and pre- and post-treatment follow-up. |
Publish Date |
2021-12-27 05:24 |
Citation |
Freitas PS, Janicas C, Veiga J, Matos AP, Herédia V, Ramalho M. Imaging evaluation of the liver in oncology patients: A comparison of techniques. World J Hepatol 2021; 13(12): 1936-1955 |
URL |
https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v13/i12/1936.htm |
DOI |
https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v13.i12.1936 |
© 2004-2025 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
California Corporate Number: 3537345