BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
8/28/2014 3:52:00 PM | Browse: 913 | Download: 394
Publication Name World Journal of Gastroenterology
Manuscript ID 7424
Country/Territory Saudi Arabia
Received
2013-11-17 08:14
Peer-Review Started
2013-11-18 13:56
To Make the First Decision
2013-12-03 19:01
Return for Revision
2013-12-13 14:53
Revised
2014-01-01 19:49
Second Decision
2014-02-20 15:41
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief
2014-02-20 15:49
Articles in Press
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript
2014-04-22 09:12
Publish the Manuscript Online
2014-05-07 10:10
ISSN 1007-9327 (print) and 2219-2840 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website http://www.wjgnet.com
Category Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Manuscript Type Prospective Study
Article Title Sedated vs unsedated colonoscopy: A prospective study
Manuscript Source Invited Manuscript
All Author List Abdulrahman M Aljebreen, Majid A Almadi and Felix W Leung
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Funding Agency Grant Number
College of Medicine Research Center, Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University (in part)
Corresponding Author Abdulrahman M Aljebreen, MD, FRCPC, Gastroenterology Division, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, PO Box 2925, Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia. amaljebreen@gmail.com
Key Words Sedation; Colonoscopy; Unsedated; Screening; Endoscopy
Core Tip Published information indicates that unsedated colonoscopies are acceptable in many countries; however, sedation is still a usual practice in many countries. Its burden includes escort requirement, time for recovery and activity restrictions. This study showed that unsedated colonoscopy is feasible in willing patients and it saves the endoscopy units up to one hour per patient. Contrary to some endoscopist’s fears, patients were still willing to return to the same physician for colonoscopy if a repeat procedure was needed.
Publish Date 2014-05-07 10:10
Citation Aljebreen AM, Almadi MA, Leung FW. Sedated vs unsedated colonoscopy: A prospective study. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(17): 5113-5118
URL http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i17/5113.htm
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i17.5113
Full Article (PDF) WJG-20-5113.pdf
Full Article (Word) WJG-20-5113.doc
Manuscript File 7424-Review.doc
Answering Reviewers 7424-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement 7424-Copyright assignment.pdf
Non-Native Speakers of English Editing Certificate 7424-Language certificate.pdf
Peer-review Report 7424-Peer reviews.pdf
Scientific Editor Work List 7424-Scientific editor work list.doc