BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
8/25/2014 2:47:00 PM | Browse: 558 | Download: 407
Publication Name World Journal of Gastroenterology
Manuscript ID 7474
Country China
Received
2013-11-20 15:48
Peer-Review Started
2013-11-21 09:47
To Make the First Decision
2014-01-15 17:36
Return for Revision
2014-01-21 09:58
Revised
2014-02-13 23:42
Second Decision
2014-03-05 14:32
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief
2014-03-05 14:53
Articles in Press
2014-05-23 11:21
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
2014-04-08 23:04
Typeset the Manuscript
2014-07-23 18:27
Publish the Manuscript Online
2014-08-07 10:34
ISSN 1007-9327 (print) and 2219-2840 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website http://www.wjgnet.com
Category Surgery
Manuscript Type Meta-Analysis
Article Title Transthoracic vs transhiatal surgery for cancer of the esophagogastric junction: A meta-analysis
Manuscript Source Invited Manuscript
All Author List Ming-Tian Wei, Yuan-Chuan Zhang, Xiang-Bing Deng, Ting-Han Yang, Ya-Zhou He and Zi-Qiang Wang
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Funding Agency Grant Number
National Natural Science Foundation of China 81172373
Corresponding Author Zi-Qiang Wang, Professor, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Alley, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China. wangzqzyh@163.com
Key Words Transthoracic surgery; Transhiatal surgery; Cancer of the esophagogastric junction; Meta-analysis
Core Tip Surgical resection is the optimum therapy for cancer of the esophagogastric junction, and the transthoracic and transhiatal approaches are the two major surgical approaches used worldwide. However, considerable debate exists on the superior benefits of the two approaches regarding their efficacy and safety. We conducted this meta-analysis to address the issue. The results indicated a shorter hospital stay, lower 30-d hospital mortality and decreased pulmonary complications with the transhiatal approach compared with the transthoracic approach. Moreover, a potential survival benefit was achieved for type Ⅲ tumors using the transhiatal approach.
Publish Date 2014-08-07 10:34
Citation Wei MT, Zhang YC, Deng XB, Yang TH, He YZ, Wang ZQ. Transthoracic vs transhiatal surgery for cancer of the esophagogastric junction: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(29): 10183-10192
URL http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i29/10183.htm
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.10183
Full Article (PDF) WJG-20-10183.pdf
Full Article (Word) WJG-20-10183.doc
Manuscript File 7474-review.docx
Answering Reviewers 7474-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement 7474-Copyright assignment.pdf
Non-Native Speakers of English Editing Certificate 7474-Language certificate.pdf
Peer-review Report 7474-Peer review(s).pdf
Scientific Editor Work List 7474-Scientific editor work list.doc