BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
9/3/2014 5:03:00 PM | Browse: 905 | Download: 749
Publication Name World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology
Manuscript ID 7602
Country United States
Received
2013-11-26 13:43
Peer-Review Started
2013-11-26 22:38
To Make the First Decision
2014-01-16 08:24
Return for Revision
2014-01-20 18:06
Revised
Second Decision
2014-04-16 17:11
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief
2014-04-16 17:23
Articles in Press
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript
2014-05-13 20:26
Publish the Manuscript Online
2014-05-14 20:01
ISSN 1948-5204 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website http://www.wjgnet.com
Category Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Manuscript Type Review
Article Title Do the benefits outweigh the side effects of colorectal cancer surveillance? A systematic review
Manuscript Source Invited Manuscript
All Author List Knut Magne Augestad, Johnie Rose, Benjamin Crawshaw, Gregory Cooper and Conor Delaney
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Funding Agency Grant Number
Norwegian Health Authorities Research Grant
Corresponding Author Knut Magne Augestad, MD, PhD Department of Colorectal Surgery University Hospital Case Medical Center 1100 Euclid Avenue Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Key Words Colorectal cancer; Follow-up; Surveillance; False positive; Cancer survivorship
Core Tip Most western countries have a national follow-up program for colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. The reported reduction in absolute mortality from intensive follow-up is 5%-10%, though recent data from the follow-up after colorectal surgery randomized trial call this effect into question. There exists limited evidence of improved quality of life (QoL) due to participation in a follow-up program, and the impact of false positive tests on QoL might be considerable. Several national experts advocate for low-cost, low-intensity CRC follow-up programs.
Publish Date 2014-05-14 20:01
Citation Augestad KM, Rose J, Crawshaw B, Cooper G, Delaney C. Do the benefits outweigh the side effects of colorectal cancer surveillance? A systematic review. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2014; 6(5): 104-111
URL http://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v6/i5/104.htm
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v6.i5.104
Full Article (PDF) WJGO-6-104.pdf
Full Article (Word) WJGO-6-104.doc
Manuscript File 7602-Review.docx
Answering Reviewers 7602-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement 7602-Copyright assignment.pdf
Peer-review Report 7602-Peer reviews.pdf
Scientific Editor Work List 7602-Scientific editor work list.doc