BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
12/2/2022 9:49:51 AM | Browse: 313 | Download: 898
 |
Received |
|
2022-07-30 08:54 |
 |
Peer-Review Started |
|
2022-07-30 08:57 |
 |
To Make the First Decision |
|
|
 |
Return for Revision |
|
2022-09-02 20:58 |
 |
Revised |
|
2022-09-14 20:25 |
 |
Second Decision |
|
2022-10-19 03:50 |
 |
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief |
|
|
 |
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief |
|
2022-10-19 16:29 |
 |
Articles in Press |
|
2022-10-19 16:29 |
 |
Publication Fee Transferred |
|
|
 |
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor |
|
2022-11-10 13:02 |
 |
Typeset the Manuscript |
|
2022-11-29 06:59 |
 |
Publish the Manuscript Online |
|
2022-12-02 09:49 |
ISSN |
1007-9327 (print) and 2219-2840 (online) |
Open Access |
This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
Copyright |
©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. |
Article Reprints |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
|
Permissions |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
|
Publisher |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA |
Website |
http://www.wjgnet.com |
Category |
Gastroenterology & Hepatology |
Manuscript Type |
Randomized Clinical Trial |
Article Title |
Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10–20 mm
|
Manuscript Source |
Unsolicited Manuscript |
All Author List |
Xue-Qun Zhang, Jian-Zhong Sang, Lei Xu, Xin-Li Mao, Bo Li, Wan-Lin Zhu, Xiao-Yun Yang and Chao-Hui Yu |
ORCID |
|
Funding Agency and Grant Number |
|
Corresponding Author |
Chao-Hui Yu, MD, PhD, Chief Doctor, Professor, Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, No. 79 Qingchun Road , Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China. zyyyych@zju.edu.cn |
Key Words |
Colorectal polyps; Medium size; Polypectomy; Endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential precutting; Conventional endoscopic mucosal resection |
Core Tip |
The optimal method for removal of sessile colorectal lesions sized 10-20 mm remains uncertain. Piecemeal and incomplete resection are major limitations of conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR) in removing sessile colorectal polyps. In this study, we found that endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential precutting achieved better en bloc resection (94.3% vs 86.0%; P = 0.041) and with no increase in adverse events. It can serve as an alternative technique to CEMR in removal of sessile colorectal lesions sized 10 mm-20 mm. |
Publish Date |
2022-12-02 09:49 |
Citation |
Zhang XQ, Sang JZ, Xu L, Mao XL, Li B, Zhu WL, Yang XY, Yu CH. Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10–20 mm. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(45): 6397-6409 |
URL |
https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i45/6397.htm |
DOI |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i45.6397 |
© 2004-2025 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
California Corporate Number: 3537345