Publication Name	World Journal of Gastroenterology
Manuscript ID	8384
Country	China

Received	2013-12-28 11:01
Peer-Review Started	2013-12-28 14:31
To Make the First Decision	2014-01-09 14:49
Return for Revision	2014-01-17 15:14
Revised	2014-02-27 22:31
Second Decision	2014-04-23 09:16
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief	2014-04-23 10:16
Articles in Press	2014-05-23 10:48
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor	2014-05-23 07:32
Typeset the Manuscript	2014-06-22 12:55
Publish the Manuscript Online	2014-07-03 15:30

ISSN	1007-9327 (print) and 2219-2840 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com

Category	Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Manuscript Type	Meta-Analysis
Article Title	Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: A meta-analysis
Manuscript Source	Unsolicited Manuscript
All Author List	Jing Wang, Xiao-Hua Zhang, Jian Ge, Chong-Mei Yang, Ji-Yong Liu and Shu-Lei Zhao
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author	Shu-Lei Zhao, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, 324 Jingwu Weiqi Rd, Jinan 250021, Shandong Province, China. wenzhu24@126.com
Key Words	Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Endoscopic mucosal resection; Colorectal tumors; En bloc resection; Local recurrence; Histological resection; Complication
Core Tip	Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was originally developed for en bloc resection of lager, flat gastrointestinal tumors. Compared with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), ESD was considered to be more time consuming and have more complications for the treatment of colorectal tumors. This meta-analysis of six trials shows that compared with EMR, ESD gives higher en bloc resection rate and lower local recurrence rate for the treatment of colorectal tumors, without increasing the procedure-related complications. ESD should be considered in the endoscopic treatment of colorectal tumors.
Publish Date	2014-07-03 15:30
Citation	Wang J, Zhang XH, Ge J, Yang CM, Liu JY, Zhao SL. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(25): 8282-8287
URL	http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i25/8282.htm
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8282

Full Article (PDF)	WJG-20-8282.pdf
Full Article (Word)	WJG-20-8282.doc
Manuscript File	8384-Review.doc
Answering Reviewers	8384-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement	8384-Copyright assignment.pdf
Non-Native Speakers of English Editing Certificate	8384-Language certificate.pdf
Peer-review Report	8384-Peer reviews.pdf
Scientific Editor Work List	8384-Scientific editor work list.doc