BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
9/25/2014 11:49:00 AM | Browse: 915 | Download: 1246
Publication Name World Journal of Meta-Analysis
Manuscript ID 8846
Country China
Received
2014-01-09 10:30
Peer-Review Started
2014-01-10 22:04
To Make the First Decision
2014-01-23 17:12
Return for Revision
2014-02-09 21:16
Revised
2014-03-03 11:20
Second Decision
2014-06-11 14:04
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief
2014-06-11 14:25
Articles in Press
2014-06-11 14:50
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript
2014-09-02 16:43
Publish the Manuscript Online
2014-09-25 11:49
ISSN 2308-3840 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website http://www.wjgnet.com
Category Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Manuscript Type Meta-Analysis
Article Title Robot-assisted vs laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis based on 3518 subjects
Manuscript Source Unsolicited Manuscript
All Author List Zhi-Dong Lin, Mao Liu, Dan Tang, Huan Li and Bai-Meng Zhang
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author Zhidong Lin Department of General Surgery, the Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University Address: No.52 Meihua East Rd. Zhuhai 519000, P.R.China E-mail: linzhidongtd@21cn.com
Key Words Gastric cancer; Robot; Laparoscopy; Gastrectomy; Meta-analysis
Core Tip A total of 13 studies with 3518 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The results indicated that robot-assisted gastrectomy was associated with longer operative time (WMD = 46.26 min, 95%CI: 31.89, 60.63, P < 0.00001), less blood loss [WMD = -37.19 mL, 95%CI: -60.16-(-14.23), P = 0.002] and shorter postoperative hospital stay [WMD = -0.65 d, 95%CI: -1.24-(-0.05), P = 0.03] than laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy. Robot-assisted gastrectomy is effective and safe in the treatment of gastric cancer and will be a promising alternative to laparoscopic surgery. Long-term randomized controlled studies with large scale and improved designs are needed to further evaluate the long-term outcomes.
Publish Date 2014-09-25 11:49
Citation Lin ZD, Liu M, Tang D, Li H, Zhang BM. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A meta-analysis based on 3518 subjects. World J Meta-Anal 2014; 2(3): 98-106
URL http://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v2/i3/98.htm
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v2.i3.98
Full Article (PDF) WJMA-2-98.pdf
Full Article (Word) WJMA-2-98.doc
Manuscript File 8846-Review.doc
Answering Reviewers 8846-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement 8846-Copyright assignment.pdf
Non-Native Speakers of English Editing Certificate 8846-Language certificate.pdf
Peer-review Report 8846-Peer review(s).pdf
Scientific Misconduct Check 8846-CrossCheck.jpg
Scientific Editor Work List 8846-Scientific editor work list.pdf