BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
8/20/2014 8:56:00 PM | Browse: 948 | Download: 761
Publication Name World Journal of Orthopedics
Manuscript ID 10647
Country New Zealand
Received
2014-04-12 18:23
Peer-Review Started
2014-04-13 11:43
To Make the First Decision
2014-05-14 13:49
Return for Revision
2014-05-15 20:53
Revised
2014-05-28 15:01
Second Decision
2014-06-18 15:06
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief
2014-06-18 15:24
Articles in Press
2014-06-18 15:48
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript
2014-08-11 08:34
Publish the Manuscript Online
2014-08-20 20:55
ISSN 2218-5836 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website http://www.wjgnet.com
Category Orthopedics
Manuscript Type Topic Highlights
Article Title Survival outcomes of cemented compared to uncemented stems in primary total hip replacement
Manuscript Source Invited Manuscript
All Author List Michael Wyatt, Gary Hooper, Christopher Frampton and Alastair Rothwell
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author Michael Wyatt, BSc(Hons), MBChB, MRCS(Ed), Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Otago, 2 Riccarton Avenue, Christchurch 4710, Canterbury 8011, New Zealand. mcwyatt@xtra.co.nz
Key Words Primary total hip replacement; Femoral fixation; Cemented; Uncemented; Joint replacement registry; Implamt survival
Core Tip There has been a worldwide trend towards uncemented fixation in total hip replacement yet paradoxically cemented fixation has the highest survival rate when failure has been defined as a revision of the primary implant for aseptic loosening. However closer analysis of registry data shows that revision for aseptic loosening is low with uncemented total hip replacement, and in particular revision of uncemented stems is the lowest in young patients under 65 years, who would be expected to have higher physical demands with higher failure rates secondary to loosening.
Publish Date 2014-08-20 20:55
Citation Wyatt M, Hooper G, Frampton C, Rothwell A. Survival outcomes of cemented compared to uncemented stems in primary total hip replacement. World J Orthop 2014; 5(5): 591-596
URL http://www.wjgnet.com/2218-5836/full/v5/i5/591.htm
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.591
Full Article (PDF) WJO-5-591.pdf
Full Article (Word) WJO-5-591.doc
Manuscript File 10647-Review.docx
Answering Reviewers 10647-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement 10647-Copyright assignment.pdf
Peer-review Report 10647-Peer review(s).pdf
Scientific Misconduct Check 10647-CrossCheck.jpg
Scientific Editor Work List 10647-Scientific editor work list.pdf