Publication Name	World Journal of Gastroenterology
Manuscript ID	1750
Country	China

Received	2013-01-03 18:19
Peer-Review Started	2013-01-03 21:59
To Make the First Decision	2013-02-01 21:32
Return for Revision	2013-02-06 19:01
Revised
Second Decision	2013-03-28 17:24
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief	2013-03-29 11:52
Articles in Press
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript	2013-06-27 16:42
Publish the Manuscript Online	2013-06-28 23:55

ISSN	1007-9327 (print) and 2219-2840 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com

Category	Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Manuscript Type	Meta-Analysis
Article Title	Meta-analysis comparison of endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy
Manuscript Source	Invited Manuscript
All Author List	Hong-Chuan Zhao, Liang He, Da-Chen Zhou, Xiao-Ping Geng and Fa-Ming Pan
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author	Hong-Chuan Zhao, Associated Professor, Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Anhui Medical University, 218 Jixi Road, Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China. Zhc0117@sina.com
Key Words	Common bile duct stone; Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation; Endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy; Meta-analysis
Core Tip	A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the outcomes of endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy (EST) and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation (EPBD) from previously published reports. Fourteen randomized trials involving 1975 patients were analyzed. Of those, 980 were treated with EPBD and 995 were treated with EST. Differences were observed between the treatments in total stone clearance, short-term complications, and long-term complications. Compared to EST, the overall stone clearance rate was lower, and the incidence of pancreatitis was higher with EPBD. Thus, EPBD may decrease the incidence of long-term complications and be more suitable for patients who have a high risk of bleeding.
Publish Date	2013-06-28 23:55
Citation	Zhao HC, He L, Zhou DC, Geng XP, Pan FM. Meta-analysis comparison of endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation and endoscopic sphincteropapillotomy. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(24): 3883-3891
URL	http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i24/3883.htm
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i24.3883

Full Article (PDF)	WJG-19-3883.pdf
Manuscript File	1750-Review.doc
Answering Reviewers	1750-Answering reviewers.doc
Copyright License Agreement	1750-Copyright assignment.docx
Non-Native Speakers of English Editing Certificate	1750-Language cetificate.pdf
Peer-review Report	1750-Peer review(s).pdf
Scientific Editor Work List	1750-Scientific editor work list.doc