Publication Name	World Journal of Gastroenterology
Manuscript ID	2446
Country	China

Received	2013-02-21 11:27
Peer-Review Started	2013-02-22 10:25
To Make the First Decision	2013-05-14 18:50
Return for Revision	2013-05-18 14:02
Revised	2013-06-16 19:21
Second Decision	2013-07-11 08:19
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief	2013-07-11 13:00
Articles in Press
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript	2013-08-05 17:12
Publish the Manuscript Online	2013-08-19 18:22

ISSN	1007-9327 (print) and 2219-2840 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com

Category	Surgery
Manuscript Type	Meta-Analysis
Article Title	Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy vs conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Manuscript Source	Invited Manuscript
All Author List	Yu-Long Cai, Xian-Ze Xiong, Si-Jia Wu, Yao Cheng, Jiong Lu, Jie Zhang, Yi-Xin Lin and Nan-Sheng Cheng
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author	Nan-Sheng Cheng, MD, Professor, Department of Bile Duct Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 GuoXue Xiang, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China. nanshengcheng2012@163.com
Key Words	Single incision; Laparoscopic; Appendectomy; Meta-analysis; Systematic review
Core Tip	The clinical benefit of single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA), compared to the conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy, has been a controversial issue in recent years. We performed the first systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails (RCTs) that have assessed the clinical benefits and disadvantages between SILA and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA). Six RCTs conducted between 2011 and 2013 were identified and pooled to determine outcomes using meta-analytic methods. From this analysis, we conclude that SILA is as safe as CLA. Although patients receiving SILA had longer operative times and a higher conversion rate, one benefit of SILA is cosmetic satisfaction.
Publish Date	2013-08-19 18:22
Citation	Cai YL, Xiong XZ, Wu SJ, Cheng Y, Lu J, Zhang J, Lin YX, Cheng NS. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy vs conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19(31): 5165-5173
URL	http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v19/i31/5165.htm
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i31.5165

Full Article (PDF)	WJG-19-5165.pdf
Manuscript File	2446-Review.docx
Answering Reviewers	2446-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement	2446-Copyright assignment.doc
Non-Native Speakers of English Editing Certificate	2446-Language certificate.pdf
Peer-review Report	2446-Peer review(s).pdf
Scientific Editor Work List	2446-Scientific editor work list.doc