BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
9/2/2014 3:36:00 PM | Browse: 468 | Download: 368
Publication Name World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Manuscript ID 4386
Country/Territory South Korea
2013-07-01 08:35
Peer-Review Started
2013-07-01 14:11
To Make the First Decision
2013-07-19 08:37
Return for Revision
2013-07-19 21:50
2013-08-07 20:29
Second Decision
2013-08-29 08:28
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief
2013-08-29 10:25
Articles in Press
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript
2013-09-23 10:04
Publish the Manuscript Online
2013-10-15 17:13
ISSN 1948-5190 (online)
Open Access
Article Reprints For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website http://www.wjgnet.com
Category Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Manuscript Type Review
Article Title Which endoscopic treatment is the best for small rectal carcinoid tumors?
Manuscript Source Invited Manuscript
All Author List Hyun Ho Choi, Jin Su Kim, Dae Young Cheung and Young-Seok Cho
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Funding Agency Grant Number
Catholic Cancer Center made in the program of 2010
National Research Foundation of Korea 2010-0023295
Corresponding author Young-Seok Cho, MD, PhD, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, 271 Cheonbo-ro, Uijeongbu 480-717, South Korea. yscho@catholic.ac.kr
Keywords Carcinoid tumor; Rectum; Polypectomy; Endoscopic mucosal resection; Endoscopic submucosal dissection
Core Tip Rectal carcinoids less than 10 mm in diameter can be resected by various endoscopic techniques, such as conventional polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), cap-assisted EMR (EMR-C), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM). There are currently limited comparative data to recommend a specific endoscopic treatment. Therefore, the choice of treatment modalities for small rectal carcinoids depends on the degree of endoscopic or surgical expertise at a given facility. Furthermore, any one of the above treatment methods could have a favorable clinical outcome if performed by gastroenterologists or surgeons with special techniques. EMR-C and TEM can be used as a salvage treatment after incomplete resection by endoscopic polypectomy. The efficacy of endoscopic submucosal resection with ligating device and ESD for salvage treatment requires further investigation.
Publish Date 2013-10-15 17:13
Citation Choi HH, Kim JS, Cheung DY, Cho YS. Which endoscopic treatment is the best for small rectal carcinoid tumors? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 5(10): 487-494
Url http://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v5/i10/487.htm
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v5.i10.487
Full Article (PDF) WJGE-5-487.pdf
Manuscript File 4386-Review.doc
Answering Reviewers 4386-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement 4386-Copyright assignment.pdf
Non-Native Speakers of English Editing Certificate 4386-Language certificate.pdf
Peer-review Report 4386-Peer review(s).pdf
Scientific Editor Work List 4386-Scientific editor work list.doc