BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
9/2/2014 2:03:00 PM | Browse: 903 | Download: 470
Publication Name World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Manuscript ID 7793
Country United Kingdom
Received
2013-11-30 15:01
Peer-Review Started
2013-11-30 21:37
To Make the First Decision
2013-12-25 18:18
Return for Revision
2013-12-27 08:32
Revised
2014-01-13 04:50
Second Decision
2014-03-12 18:34
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief
2014-03-12 18:41
Articles in Press
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript
2014-05-11 17:24
Publish the Manuscript Online
2014-05-20 12:16
ISSN 1948-5190 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website http://www.wjgnet.com
Category Surgery
Manuscript Type Meta-Analysis
Article Title Systematic review of oncological outcomes following laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision
Manuscript Source Invited Manuscript
All Author List Muhammad Shafique Sajid, Adil Ahamd, William FA Miles and Mirza Khurrum Baig
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author Muhammad Shafique Sajid, Surgical Specialist Registrar, Department of General, Endoscopic and Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery, Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust, Worthing Hospital, Washington Suite, North Wing, West Sussex, BN11 2DH, United Kingdom. surgeon1wrh@hotmail.com
Key Words Total mesorectal excision; Anterior resection; Abdominoperineal resection; Rectal cancer; Oncological outcomes
Core Tip Based upon the findings of this systematic review of eleven randomized trial on 2143 patients of rectal cancer, there is a higher risk of surgical site infection, higher risk of incomplete total mesorectal resection and prolonged length of hospital stay following open total mesorectal excision (OTME) compared to laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME). The number of harvested lymph nodes, tumour recurrence and risk of positive resection margins were statistically similar in both groups. In addition, the operative complications, anastomotic leak and mortality were comparable between LTME and OTME. LTME appears to have clinically and oncologically measurable advantages over OTME in patients with primary resectable rectal cancer.
Publish Date 2014-05-20 12:16
Citation Sajid MS, Ahmad A, Miles WFA, Baig MK. Systematic review of oncological outcomes following laparoscopic vs open total mesorectal excision. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6(5): 209-219
URL http://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v6/i5/209.htm
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v6.i5.209
Full Article (PDF) WJGE-6-209.pdf
Manuscript File 7793-Review.doc
Answering Reviewers 7793-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement 7793-Copyright assignment.pdf
Peer-review Report 7793-Peer review(s).pdf
Scientific Editor Work List 7793-Scientific editor work list.doc