BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
3/30/2015 5:46:00 PM | Browse: 1098 | Download: 1815
 |
Received |
|
2014-09-13 14:18 |
|
Peer-Review Started |
|
2014-09-13 20:13 |
|
To Make the First Decision |
|
2014-10-14 16:55 |
|
Return for Revision |
|
2014-10-17 08:15 |
|
Revised |
|
2014-11-16 00:50 |
|
Second Decision |
|
2014-12-26 13:44 |
 |
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief |
|
|
|
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief |
|
2015-01-08 17:22 |
|
Articles in Press |
|
2015-01-08 17:34 |
|
Publication Fee Transferred |
|
|
|
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor |
|
|
|
Typeset the Manuscript |
|
2015-03-14 15:13 |
|
Publish the Manuscript Online |
|
2015-03-30 14:23 |
| ISSN |
1007-9327 (print) and 2219-2840 (online) |
| Open Access |
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
| Copyright |
© The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
|
| Article Reprints |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
|
| Permissions |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
|
| Publisher |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA |
| Website |
http://www.wjgnet.com |
| Category |
Anesthesiology |
| Manuscript Type |
Randomized Controlled Trial |
| Article Title |
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedation between dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil during endoscopic submucosal dissection
|
| Manuscript Source |
Unsolicited Manuscript |
| All Author List |
Namo Kim, Young-Chul Yoo, Sang Kil Lee, Hyunzu Kim, Hyang Mi Ju and Kyeong Tae Min |
| Funding Agency and Grant Number |
|
| Corresponding Author |
Kyeong Tae Min, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, South Korea. ktmin501@yuhs.ac |
| Key Words |
Dexmedetomidine; Efficacy; Peristalsis; Safety; Endoscopic submucosal dissection |
| Core Tip |
Propofol and remifentanil are effectively used for endoscopic procedures. However, deep sedation especially with propofol is frequently associated with cardiorespiratory complications; therefore, it is of interest to identify shallower yet equally effective sedation protocols. Dexmedetomidine allows sedation without respiratory depression, and has also been utilized for sedation for endoscopic procedures. This study compared the efficacy and safety between propofol-remifentanil and dexmedetomidine-remi?fentanil during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) from the perspective of the endoscopist and the patient. We found that efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine-remifentanil were comparable to propofol-remifentanil during ESD, but the endoscopists favored the dexmedetomidine-remifentanil regimen perhaps due to lower gastric motility. |
| Publish Date |
2015-03-30 14:23 |
| Citation |
Kim N, Yoo YC, Lee SK, Kim H, Ju HM, Min KT. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedation between dexmedetomidine-remifentanil and propofol-remifentanil during endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(12): 3671-3678 |
| URL |
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v21/i12/3671.htm |
| DOI |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i12.3671 |
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
California Corporate Number: 3537345
