BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
1/31/2016 7:20:00 PM | Browse: 1063 | Download: 1240
 |
Received |
|
2015-08-01 08:40 |
 |
Peer-Review Started |
|
2015-08-06 08:30 |
 |
To Make the First Decision |
|
2015-09-16 08:58 |
 |
Return for Revision |
|
2015-09-23 12:23 |
 |
Revised |
|
2015-10-27 07:52 |
 |
Second Decision |
|
2015-11-27 11:55 |
 |
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief |
|
2015-11-27 12:38 |
 |
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief |
|
2015-12-15 09:12 |
 |
Articles in Press |
|
2015-12-15 09:12 |
 |
Publication Fee Transferred |
|
|
 |
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor |
|
|
 |
Typeset the Manuscript |
|
2016-01-23 20:32 |
 |
Publish the Manuscript Online |
|
2016-01-31 19:20 |
ISSN |
2218-6220 (online) |
Open Access |
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
Copyright |
© The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. |
Article Reprints |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
|
Permissions |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
|
Publisher |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA |
Website |
http://www.wjgnet.com |
Category |
Obstetrics & Gynecology |
Manuscript Type |
Minireviews |
Article Title |
Amniocentesis: A contemporary review
|
Manuscript Source |
Invited Manuscript |
All Author List |
Katherine Ann Connolly and Keith Arnold Eddleman |
Funding Agency and Grant Number |
|
Corresponding Author |
Katherine Ann Connolly, MD, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Mount Sinai Hospital, 5 East 98th Street, Room 256, New York, NY 10029,
United States. katherine.connolly@mssm.edu
|
Key Words |
Amniocentesis; Prenatal diagnosis; Invasive genetic testing; Procedure related loss rates; Cell free fetal DNA testing; Fetal lung maturity; Intraamniotic infection |
Core Tip |
Invasive testing remains the only way to provide comprehensive testing for chromosomal abnor-malities. Despite availability of cell free fetal DNA testing, amniocentesis should still be offered to all women who desire complete genetic testing. Amniocentesis is also useful if intraamniotic infection is suspected, but the clinical picture is unclear. Addi-tionally, when late preterm delivery is indicated, amnio-centesis need not be used. There are, however, some instances when delivery timing is unclear and amniocentesis for fetal lung maturity may provide information to guide delivery timing. Amniocentesis is a relatively safe procedure. We counsel patients that technique has changed since the original studies in the 1970s and feel comfortable quoting a loss rate of 1/500-1/1000 based on contemporary data.
|
Publish Date |
2016-01-31 19:20 |
Citation |
Connolly KA, Eddleman KA. Amniocentesis: A contemporary review. World J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 5(1): 58-65 |
URL |
http://www.wjgnet.com/2218-6220/full/v5/i1/58.htm |
DOI |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5317/wjog.v5.i1.58 |
© 2004-2025 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
California Corporate Number: 3537345