| ISSN |
1948-5204 (online) |
| Open Access |
This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
| Copyright |
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. |
| Article Reprints |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
|
| Permissions |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
|
| Publisher |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA |
| Website |
http://www.wjgnet.com |
| Category |
Surgery |
| Manuscript Type |
Retrospective Cohort Study |
| Article Title |
Robotic- vs laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for locally advanced rectal cancer based on propensity score matching: Short-term outcomes at a colorectal center in China
|
| Manuscript Source |
Invited Manuscript |
| All Author List |
Shan-Ping Ye, Wei-Quan Zhu, Dong-Ning Liu, Xiong Lei, Qun-Guang Jiang, Hui-Min Hu, Bo Tang, Peng-Hui He, Geng-Mei Gao, He-Chun Tang, Jun Shi and Tai-Yuan Li |
| ORCID |
|
| Funding Agency and Grant Number |
| Funding Agency |
Grant Number |
| Infrastructure Supporting Project of Jiangxi Scientific Research Institute |
20142BBA13039 |
|
| Corresponding Author |
Tai-Yuan Li, MD, PhD, Chief Doctor, Director, Director, Professor, Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, No. 17 Yongwaizheng Street, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China. litaiyuanyfy@sina.com |
| Key Words |
Rectal neoplasms; Robotics; Laparoscopy; Proctectomy; Treatment outcome; |
| Core Tip |
For patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, there is no consensus regarding whether robotic-assisted proctectomy and laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy is more beneficial. We conducted this retrospective cohort study to compare the short-term outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic for the rectal surgery. Compared with the laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy group, the robotic-assisted proctectomy group had less intraoperative blood loss, lower volume of pelvic cavity drainage, less time to remove the pelvic drainage tube and urinary catheter, longer distal resection margin and lower rates of conversion. Furthermore, the time to recover bowel function, the harvested lymph nodes, the postoperative length of hospital stay, the rate of unplanned readmission within 30 d postoperatively, and the rates of total complications showed no difference between the two groups. |
| Publish Date |
2020-04-15 12:00 |
| Citation |
Ye SP, Zhu WQ, Liu DN, Lei X, Jiang QG, Hu HM, Tang B, He PH, Gao GM, Tang HC, Shi J, Li TY. Robotic- vs laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for locally advanced rectal cancer based on propensity score matching: Short-term outcomes at a colorectal center in China. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12(4): 424-434 |
| URL |
https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5204/full/v12/i4/424.htm |
| DOI |
https://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i4.424 |
