Publication Name	World Journal of Gastroenterology
Manuscript ID	5360
Country	South Korea

Received	2013-09-02 08:29
Peer-Review Started	2013-09-02 18:05
To Make the First Decision	2013-10-14 21:17
Return for Revision	2013-10-16 10:45
Revised	2013-11-03 18:30
Second Decision	2013-11-18 21:01
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief	2013-11-19 12:16
Articles in Press
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript	2014-01-16 09:20
Publish the Manuscript Online	2014-03-12 11:24

ISSN	1007-9327 (print) and 2219-2840 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com

Category	Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Manuscript Type	Autobiography
Article Title	Is the AIMS65 score useful in predicting outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding?
Manuscript Source	Invited Manuscript
All Author List	Sung Hoon Jung, Jung Hwan Oh, Hye Yeon Lee, Joon Won Jeong, Se Eun Go, Chan Ran You, Eun Jung Jeon and Sang Wook Choi
Funding Agency and Grant Number	Funding Agency Grant Number Catholic Research Coordinating Center of the Korea health 21 R and D Project A070001 Ministry of Health and Welfare South Korea
Corresponding Author	Jung Hwan Oh, MD, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, St. Paul’s Hospital, 180 Wangsan-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-709, South Korea. ojh@catholic.ac.kr
Key Words	Gastrointestinal haemorrhage; Peptic ulcer; Mortality; Morbidity; Prognosis
Core Tip	AIMS65 score is a novel simple score for predicting outcomes for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB). However, this scoring system is based on analyses of data from a mixed patient population with both variceal and non-variceal UGIB. The present study focused on the effectiveness of the AIMS65 score in predicting outcomes of peptic ulcer bleeding. This retrospective single-centre study, which included 149 patients, revealed that the AIMS65 score may not be suitable for predicting outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding. Further, low albumin levels may be a risk factor associated with high mortality in peptic ulcer bleeding.
Publish Date	2014-03-12 11:24
Citation	Jung SH, Oh JH, Lee HY, Jeong JW, Go SE, You CR, Jeon EJ, Choi SW. Is the AIMS65 score useful in predicting outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding? World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20(7): 1846-1851
URL	http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v20/i7/1846.htm
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i7.1846

Full Article (PDF)	WJG-20-1846.pdf
Full Article (Word)	WJG-20-1846.doc
Manuscript File	5360-Review.docx
Answering Reviewers	5360-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement	5360-Copyright assignment.pdf
Non-Native Speakers of English Editing Certificate	5360-Language certificate.pdf
Peer-review Report	5360-Peer review(s).pdf
Scientific Editor Work List	5360-Scientific editor work list.doc