BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
5/8/2021 5:15:31 AM | Browse: 602 | Download: 1106
 |
Received |
|
2020-12-11 23:45 |
 |
Peer-Review Started |
|
2020-12-11 23:46 |
 |
To Make the First Decision |
|
|
 |
Return for Revision |
|
2021-01-29 03:11 |
 |
Revised |
|
2021-02-09 00:31 |
 |
Second Decision |
|
2021-03-22 08:51 |
 |
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief |
|
|
 |
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief |
|
2021-04-12 03:46 |
 |
Articles in Press |
|
2021-04-12 03:46 |
 |
Publication Fee Transferred |
|
|
 |
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor |
|
|
 |
Typeset the Manuscript |
|
2021-05-07 00:25 |
 |
Publish the Manuscript Online |
|
2021-05-08 05:15 |
ISSN |
1948-5190 (online) |
Open Access |
This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
Copyright |
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. |
Article Reprints |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
|
Permissions |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
|
Publisher |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA |
Website |
http://www.wjgnet.com |
Category |
Surgery |
Manuscript Type |
Meta-Analysis |
Article Title |
Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized evidence comparing general anesthesia vs regional anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy
|
Manuscript Source |
Invited Manuscript |
All Author List |
Peter Asaad, Adam O’Connor, Shahab Hajibandeh and Shahin Hajibandeh |
ORCID |
|
Funding Agency and Grant Number |
|
Corresponding Author |
Shahin Hajibandeh, MD, Senior Researcher, Surgeon, Department of General Surgery, Wye Valley NHS Trust, Hereford, Hereford HR1 2ER, United Kingdom. shahin_hajibandeh@yahoo.com |
Key Words |
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Regional anesthesia; General anesthesia; Laparoscopy; Level 1 evidence; Meta-analysis |
Core Tip |
Despite the existence of solid level 1 evidence from multiple randomized controlled trials on comparative outcomes of general anesthesia and regional anesthesia (RA) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and demonstration of feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy under RA, lack of knowledge on the impact of RA on specific procedure related outcomes may discourage surgeons from selecting RA as the first choice of anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Considering our findings, we encourage use of RA in patients who are not fit for general anesthesia but do not hesitate to highlight that available evidence does not justify using RA as the first line anesthetic choice for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. |
Publish Date |
2021-05-08 05:15 |
Citation |
Asaad P, O’Connor A, Hajibandeh S, Hajibandeh S. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized evidence comparing general anesthesia vs regional anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 13(5): 137-154 |
URL |
https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v13/i5/137.htm |
DOI |
https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v13.i5.137 |
© 2004-2025 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
California Corporate Number: 3537345