BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
5/18/2022 8:53:39 AM | Browse: 444 | Download: 1101
 |
Received |
|
2021-04-13 02:06 |
 |
Peer-Review Started |
|
2021-04-13 02:08 |
 |
To Make the First Decision |
|
|
 |
Return for Revision |
|
2021-10-17 06:56 |
 |
Revised |
|
2021-11-21 19:02 |
 |
Second Decision |
|
2022-04-21 02:25 |
 |
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief |
|
|
 |
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief |
|
2022-04-26 17:19 |
 |
Articles in Press |
|
2022-04-26 17:19 |
 |
Publication Fee Transferred |
|
|
 |
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor |
|
|
 |
Typeset the Manuscript |
|
2022-05-13 10:34 |
 |
Publish the Manuscript Online |
|
2022-05-18 08:53 |
ISSN |
1949-8462 (online) |
Open Access |
This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
Copyright |
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. |
Article Reprints |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
|
Permissions |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
|
Publisher |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA |
Website |
http://www.wjgnet.com |
Category |
Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems |
Manuscript Type |
Meta-Analysis |
Article Title |
Comparative efficacy and safety of adenosine and regadenoson for assessment of fractional flow reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis
|
Manuscript Source |
Invited Manuscript |
All Author List |
Gauravpal Singh Gill, Akshaya Gadre and Arun Kanmanthareddy |
ORCID |
|
Funding Agency and Grant Number |
|
Corresponding Author |
Arun Kanmanthareddy, MD, MS, Assistant Professor, Cardiovascular Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine, 7710 Mercy Road, Suite 401, Omaha, NE 68124, United States. akanmantha@gmail.com |
Key Words |
Adenosine; Regadenoson; Fractional flow reserve; Meta-analysis |
Core Tip |
Regadenoson has comparable efficacy in inducing maximal coronary hyperemia in patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography with lower risk of side effects compared to adenosine. To compare fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment using adenosine with an alternate hyperemic agent, regadenoson. PubMed, Google Scholar, CINAHL and Cochrane databases were queried for studies comparing adenosine and regadenoson for assessment of FFR. There was excellent correlation between the FFR measurements by both the agents. The use of adenosine, was however associated with higher risk of adverse events and longer time to FFR compared to regadenoson. |
Publish Date |
2022-05-18 08:53 |
Citation |
Gill GS, Gadre A, Kanmanthareddy A. Comparative efficacy and safety of adenosine and regadenoson for assessment of fractional flow reserve: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Cardiol 2022; 14(5): 319-328 |
URL |
https://www.wjgnet.com/1949-8462/full/v14/i5/319.htm |
DOI |
https://dx.doi.org/10.4330/wjc.v14.i5.319 |
© 2004-2025 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
California Corporate Number: 3537345