BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Articles Published Processes
1/2/2024 9:08:47 AM | Browse: 162 | Download: 595
 |
Received |
|
2023-10-13 07:16 |
 |
Peer-Review Started |
|
2023-10-13 07:18 |
 |
To Make the First Decision |
|
|
 |
Return for Revision |
|
2023-11-28 01:08 |
 |
Revised |
|
2023-12-12 02:33 |
 |
Second Decision |
|
2023-12-18 02:38 |
 |
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief |
|
|
 |
Accepted by Executive Editor-in-Chief |
|
2023-12-18 06:43 |
 |
Articles in Press |
|
2023-12-18 06:43 |
 |
Publication Fee Transferred |
|
|
 |
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor |
|
|
 |
Typeset the Manuscript |
|
2023-12-23 02:30 |
 |
Publish the Manuscript Online |
|
2024-01-02 09:08 |
ISSN |
2307-8960 (online) |
Open Access |
This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
Copyright |
©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. |
Article Reprints |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
|
Permissions |
For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
|
Publisher |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA |
Website |
http://www.wjgnet.com |
Category |
Gastroenterology & Hepatology |
Manuscript Type |
Systematic Reviews |
Article Title |
Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs transanal endoscopic surgery for rectal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis
|
Manuscript Source |
Unsolicited Manuscript |
All Author List |
Long-Wu Huang and Ying Zhong |
ORCID |
|
Funding Agency and Grant Number |
|
Corresponding Author |
Ying Zhong, MD, Doctor, Doctor, Department of Gastroenterology, Huzhou Third Municipal Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University, 2088 Tiaoxi East Road, Wuxing District, Huzhou 313000, Zhejiang Province, China. chenjinshijin2@163.com |
Key Words |
Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Transanal endoscopic submucosal dissection; Meta-analysis; Surgical outcomes; Rectal tumours |
Core Tip |
This meta-analysis compares Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD) and Transanal Endoscopic Surgery (TES) for rectal tumours, focusing on recurrence rates, resection efficacies, and procedural outcomes. Our findings reveal no significant differences in recurrence or resection rates between ESD and TES, highlighting their comparable efficacies. However, the methods differ in anaesthesia requirements, impacting patient experience and recovery. With substantial heterogeneity in study designs and patient populations, our analysis underscores the need for standardized multicentric studies. This comprehensive comparison provides crucial insights for clinicians in selecting the most appropriate surgical technique based on tumour characteristics, patient profiles, and institutional resources. |
Publish Date |
2024-01-02 09:08 |
Citation |
Huang LW, Zhong Y. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs transanal endoscopic surgery for rectal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(1): 95-106 |
URL |
https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i1/95.htm |
DOI |
https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i1.95 |
© 2004-2025 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
California Corporate Number: 3537345