Publication Name	World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Manuscript ID	11069
Country	Italy

Received	2014-05-03 19:30
Peer-Review Started	2014-05-04 08:31
To Make the First Decision	2014-06-27 11:55
Return for Revision	2014-06-30 14:41
Revised	2014-06-30 23:14
Second Decision	2014-10-10 18:00
Accepted by Journal Editor-in-Chief
Accepted by Company Editor-in-Chief	2014-10-10 18:11
Articles in Press	2014-10-10 18:11
Publication Fee Transferred
Edit the Manuscript by Language Editor
Typeset the Manuscript	2014-11-05 20:02
Publish the Manuscript Online	2014-11-19 14:48

ISSN	1948-5190 (online)
Open Access
Copyright
Article Reprints	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/247
Permissions	For details, please visit: http://www.wjgnet.com/bpg/gerinfo/207
Publisher	Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Website	http://www.wjgnet.com

Category	Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Manuscript Type	Meta-Analysis
Article Title	Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: A meta-analysis
Manuscript Source	Invited Manuscript
All Author List	Antonio Facciorusso, Matteo Antonino, Marianna Di Maso and Nicola Muscatiello
Funding Agency and Grant Number
Corresponding Author	Dr. Antonio Facciorusso, Gastroenterology Section, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Viale Pinto, 1, 71100 Foggia, Italy. antonio.facciorusso@virgilio.it
Key Words	Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Endoscopic mucosal resection; Early gastric cancer; Meta-analysis
Core Tip	Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) represents a promising approach to the therapy of Early Gastric Cancer. Preliminar studies showed better outcomes in terms of complete en bloc and histologic resection rate with respect to classical Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR). Some concerns raise due to higher complication rate (particularly perforation) and longer operation times related to the complexity of the procedure. The current meta-analysis outline the superiority of ESD in obtaining higher radical resection rate and lower recurrence rates compared to EMR but confirms the aforementioned concerns on higher incidences of perforation and bleeding (in this case non significantly) after ESD.
Publish Date	2014-11-19 14:48
Citation	Facciorusso A, Antonino M, Di Maso M, Muscatiello N. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer: A meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 6(11): 555-563
URL	http://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v6/i11/555.htm
DOI	http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v6.i11.555

Full Article (PDF)	WJGE-6-555.pdf
Manuscript File	11069-Review.docx
Answering Reviewers	11069-Answering reviewers.pdf
Copyright License Agreement	11069-Copyright assignment.pdf
Peer-review Report	11069-Peer review(s).pdf
Scientific Misconduct Check	11069-CrossCheck.jpg
Scientific Editor Work List	11069-Scientific editor work list.pdf